Perceived versus actual computer-email-web fluency

The purpose of this study was to compare people's perception of their computer-email-web (CEW) fluency to their actual abilities performing related tasks. A total of 61 subjects (51% female, mean age 19) participated in the research sessions. Participants completed the CEW fluency scale [Bunz, U. (2004). The computer-email-web (CEW) fluency scale - Development and validation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 17(4), 477-504.], the computer anxiety ratings scale [Heinssen, R. K., Glass, C. R., & Knight L. A. (1987). Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the computer anxiety rating scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 3, 49-59.], and an applied protocol developed for this study. Results show that the less computer anxiety subjects reported, the higher they perceived their CEW fluency to be (p=.001), but there was no significant relationship between computer anxiety and actual fluency (p=.12). There was no gender difference as to actual CEW fluency (p=.11), but women perceived their fluency lower than did men (p=.012). Overall results validate the robustness of the CEW fluency scale, help identify CEW fluency as a digital divide component, and underscore the importance of initiatives to raise women's technological self-confidence.

[1]  Jayne E. Geissler,et al.  University Students' Computer Knowledge and Commitment to Learning. , 1993 .

[2]  Alan Durndell,et al.  Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  The Multilevel and Multifaceted Character of Computer Self-Efficacy: Toward Clarification of the Construct and an Integrative Framework for Research , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Neil Charness,et al.  Issues in training older adults to use computers , 1995, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[5]  A. Colley,et al.  Effects of Gender Role Identity and Experience on Computer Attitude Components , 1994 .

[6]  Phyllis Schumacher,et al.  Gender, Internet and computer attitudes and experiences , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: An Empirical Examination of Individual Differences and System Characteristics , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  J. Snel,et al.  Work and aging A European Prospective , 1995 .

[9]  John Carlo Bertot,et al.  The multiple dimensions of the digital divide: more than the technology 'haves' and 'have nots' , 2003, Government Information Quarterly.

[10]  David Dunning,et al.  How chronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) estimates of performance. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Alan Durndell,et al.  Gender and computing: West and east Europe , 1997 .

[12]  B. Whitley.  Gender Differences in Computer-Related Attitudes and Behavior: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[13]  Michael Moffatt,et al.  Coming of Age in New Jersey: College and American Culture , 1990 .

[14]  Laura Dianne Stanley,et al.  Beyond Access: Psychosocial Barriers to Computer Literacy Special Issue: ICTs and Community Networking , 2003, Inf. Soc..

[15]  T. Levine,et al.  Computer use, confidence, attitudes, and knowledge : A causal analysis , 1998 .

[16]  D. Grosshandler,et al.  Constructing fun: self-determination and learning at an afterschool design lab , 2000 .

[17]  Mark Girod,et al.  The opposite of control: a Deweyan perspective on intrinsic motivation in “After 3” technology programs , 2000 .

[18]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[19]  Rowena Cullen,et al.  Addressing the digital divide , 2001, Online Inf. Rev..

[20]  R. Heinssen,et al.  Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale , 1987 .

[21]  Angela F. L. Wong,et al.  Computer anxiety and its correlates : a meta-analysis , 1999 .

[22]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[23]  Eileen M. Trauth,et al.  Odd girl out: an individual differences perspective on women in the IT profession , 2002, Inf. Technol. People.

[24]  Ulla K. Bunz,et al.  The Computer-Email-Web (CEW) Fluency Scale--Development and Validation , 2001 .

[25]  Chelley Vician,et al.  Investigating Computer Anxiety and Communication Apprehension as Performance Antecedents in a Computing-Intensive Learning Environment , 2003, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Alfred V. Aho,et al.  Being Fluent with Information Technology , 1999 .

[27]  G. Torkzadeh,et al.  Factorial Validity of a Computer Self-Efficacy Scale and the Impact of Computer Training , 1994 .

[28]  Lily Shashaani,et al.  Socioeconomic Status, Parents' Sex-Role Stereotypes, and the Gender Gap in Computing , 1994 .

[29]  Denise Potosky,et al.  A field study of computer efficacy beliefs as an outcome of training: the role of computer playfulness, computer knowledge, and performance during training , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  Nikos Bozionelos,et al.  Computer anxiety: relationship with computer experience and prevalence , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  M MarakasGeorge,et al.  The Multilevel and Multifaceted Character of Computer Self-Efficacy , 1998 .

[32]  Kittipong Laosethakul,et al.  Are Gender Perceptions of Computing Changing over Time? , 2003, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Owen Adams.  Falling through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide: A Report on the Telecommunications and Information Technology Gap in America , 2000 .

[34]  Stephen J. Farenga,et al.  Intentions of Young Students to Enroll in Science Courses in the Future: An Examination of Gender Differences. , 1999 .

[35]  Elizabeth M. Weiss,et al.  Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample: testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[36]  Barbara L. Grabowski,et al.  The effects of computer self-efficacy on direction-following behavior in computer assisted instruction , 1992 .

[37]  Rationale and development of a scale to measure computer-mediated communication apprehension , 1991 .

[38]  Angela Lewis.  Hoax E-mails and Bonsai Kittens: Are You E-literate in the Docuverse? , 2002, First Monday.

[39]  Jake Harwood,et al.  Relational, role, and social identity as expressed in grandparents’ personal web sites , 2004 .

[40]  H.-W. Chou,et al.  Effects of training method and computer anxiety on learning performance and self-efficacy , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[41]  Peter Caputi,et al.  Differentiating Computer Experience and Attitudes toward Computers: An Empirical Investigation , 2000 .

[42]  Mark Brosnan,et al.  Technophobia: The Psychological Impact of Information Technology , 1998 .

[43]  Joo-Young Jung,et al.  Exploring the Digital Divide , 2001, Commun. Res..

[44]  I. Miura,et al.  The relationship of computer self-efficacy expectations to computer interest and course enrollment in college , 1987 .

[45]  James W. Marcum.  Rethinking Information Literacy , 2002, The Library Quarterly.

[46]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Developing an Internet Attitude Scale for high school students , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[47]  Kevin Tierney,et al.  The factor structure of the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale and the Computer Thoughts Survey , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[48]  Johannes Naumann,et al.  Attitudes toward the computer: construct validation of an instrument with scales differentiated by content , 2000 .

[49]  Jeffrey Cinnamond,et al.  Coming of age in New Jersey : college and American culture , 1990 .

[50]  C. Steele.  A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[51]  Kerri L. Johnson,et al.  Why People Fail to Recognize Their Own Incompetence , 2003 .

[52]  Dudley W. Reynolds,et al.  Linguistic correlates of second language literacy development: Evidence from middle-grade learner essays , 2005 .

[53]  Jean Claude Marquié,et al.  Do older adults underestimate their actual computer knowledge? , 2002, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[54]  R. Jayasuriya,et al.  A review of the construct of computer experience , 1999 .

[55]  Henk G. Schmidt,et al.  The structure of computer anxiety: a six-factor model , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[56]  Huey-Wen Chou,et al.  The influence of learning style and training method on self-efficacy and learning performance in WWW homepage design training , 2000, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[57]  Herbert Lin,et al.  Fluency with information technology∗ , 2000, Gov. Inf. Q..

[58]  Kevin Tierney,et al.  The relation of gender and background experience to self-reported computing anxieties and cognitions , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[59]  Joseph B. Sidowski,et al.  Measurements of computer satisfaction, literacy, and aptitudes: A review , 1990, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[60]  Laura Hall,et al.  Computer self-efficacy, training effectiveness and user attitudes: An empirical study , 1999, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[61]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[62]  Trends in cognitive psychology , 2002 .

[63]  J. Eccles.  Gender Roles and Women's Achievement-Related Decisions , 1987 .

[64]  Linda J. Sax,et al.  Technological Preparedness among Entering Freshmen: The Role of Race, Class, and Gender , 2001 .

[65]  Thomas P. Van Dyke,et al.  Effects of training on Internet self-efficacy and computer user attitudes , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[66]  Lewis A. Rhodes,et al.  On Computers, Personal Styles, and Being Human: A Conversation with Sherry Turkle. , 1986 .

[67]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Digital Divide , 2002, First Monday.

[68]  M. Brosnan,et al.  A cross-cultural comparison of gender differences in computer attitudes and anxieties : the united kingdom and Hong Kong , 1998 .