Source models and yield-scaling relations for underground nuclear explosions at Amchitka Island

Source models are determined for the three underground nuclear explosions at the Amchitka test site using seismic observations in the period range 0.5 to 20.0 sec. Empirical yield-scaling relations are inferred from the source models and compared with the predictions of the Haskell, Mueller-Murphy, and finite difference numerical models. Several recent studies of high-frequency, near-field signals and teleseismic short-period P waves for LONGSHOT, MILROW, and CANNIKIN constrain the source functions at periods of 0.5 to 2.0 sec. Teleseismic pS and Rayleigh wave observations are used to constrain the source functions at longer periods. Using a modified Haskell source time function representation given by ψ(t) = ψ_∞ {1-e^(-kt)[1 + Kt + (Kt)^2/2-B(Kt)^3]}, the data are best-fit if the corner frequency parameter, K, scales as predicted by the Mueller-Murphy model, and if the amount of overshoot in the reduced displacement potential, which is proportional to B, decreases with increasing yield (depth of burial). The latter behavior is opposite to that predicted by the Mueller-Murphy model and follows from the observation that the long-period level of the explosion potential, ψ_∝, increases with yield, W, by ψ_∝ ∝ W^(0.90), or with yield and depth by ψ_∝ ∝ W/h^(1/3). This long-period and overshoot scaling is consistent with that found for some numerical models, and allowing for the depth dependence of the Rayleigh wave excitation, results in the observed M_S versus log(W) slope of ∼1. The decrease in overshoot with increasing depth of burial may be the result of the increase in shear strength with increasing overburden pressure. If yield or depth dependence of the source potential overshoot proves to be a general phenomenon, a possibility supported by a preliminary investigation of Pahute Mesa observations, accurate yield estimation will require broadband seismic data. The source function representation adopted is shown to provide an excellent fit to the rise time of very near-in velocity recordings to the rise time with frequencies of 10 Hz and higher.

[1]  Peter Molnar,et al.  Excitation of seismic surface waves with periods of 15 to 70 seconds for earthquakes and underground explosions , 1971 .

[2]  W. J. Hannon,et al.  Amplitude-yield scaling for underground nuclear explosions , 1973, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[3]  Gerhard Müller,et al.  Seismic moment and long-period radiation of underground nuclear explosions , 1973, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[4]  T. Lay,et al.  Estimating the yields of the Amchitka tests by waveform intercorrelation , 1984 .

[5]  John R. Murphy,et al.  Seismic characteristics of underground nuclear detonations Part I. Seismic spectrum scaling , 1971 .

[6]  Donald V. Helmberger,et al.  Seismic Source Descriptions of Underground Explosions and a Depth Discriminate , 1972 .

[7]  John R. Murphy,et al.  SEISMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF UNDERGROUND NUCLEAR DETONATIONS. PART II. ELASTIC ENERGY AND MAGNITUDE DETERMINATIONS. , 1971 .

[8]  Hadley,et al.  Seismic source functions and attenuation from local and teleseismic observations of the NTS Events Jorum and Handley. Quarterly technical report, 22 November 1978-31 January 1979 , 1981 .

[9]  David G. Harkrider Coupling Near Source Phenomena into Surface Wave Generation , 1981 .

[10]  David von Seggern,et al.  Source Time Functions and Spectra for Underground Nuclear Explosions , 1972 .

[11]  John R. Murphy Discussion of “Seismic source function for an underground nuclear explosion” by Keiiti Aki, Michel Bouchon, and Paul Reasenberg , 1974 .

[12]  Keiiti Aki,et al.  Seismic source function for an underground nuclear explosion : 10F, 3T, 48R Seismol. Soc. Amer. Bull. V64, N1, Feb. 1974, P131–148 , 1974 .

[13]  E. Engdahl Seismic effects of the MILROW and CANNIKIN nuclear explosions , 1972, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[14]  P. W. Basham,et al.  Seismic magnitudes of underground nuclear explosions , 1973, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[15]  Thomas C. Bache,et al.  Estimating the yield of underground nuclear explosions , 1982 .

[16]  Gill Blay A Deterministic Approach to Systems Design , 1981 .

[17]  C. King,et al.  Teleseismic source parameters of the Longshot, Milrow, and Cannikin nuclear explosions , 1974 .

[18]  H. H. Kehrer,et al.  Tectonic strain-release characteristics of CANNIKIN , 1972, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[19]  H. C. Rodean,et al.  Magnitude corrections for attenuation in the upper mantle , 1979 .

[20]  J. Theodore Cherry,et al.  Surface waves from underground explosions with spall: analysis of elastic and nonlinear source models , 1983 .

[21]  Dan W. Patterson NUCLEAR DECOUPLING, FULL AND PARTIAL , 1966 .

[22]  John R. Murphy,et al.  Seismic source functions and magnitude determinations for underground nuclear detonations , 1977, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[23]  T. Lay,et al.  The effects of tectonic release on short-period P waves from NTS explosions , 1984 .

[24]  H. C. Rodean,et al.  Inelastic Processes in Seismic Wave Generation by Underground Explosions , 1981 .

[25]  L. J. Burdick,et al.  Time functions appropriate for nuclear explosions , 1979, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[26]  J. Brune,et al.  Excitation of surface waves by the underground nuclear explosion long shot , 1966 .

[27]  Yi-Ben Tsai,et al.  Amplitude spectra of surface waves from small earthquakes and underground nuclear explosions , 1971 .

[28]  W. Perret Close-in ground motion from the MILROW and CANNIKIN events , 1972, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[29]  Ari Ben-Menahem,et al.  Determination of source parameters of explosions and earthquakes by amplitude equalization of seismic surface waves: 1. Underground nuclear explosions , 1964 .

[30]  Thorne Lay,et al.  Modeling Near-Field and Teleseismic Observations From the Amchitka Test Site , 1984 .

[31]  H. Hasegawa Surface- and body-wave spectra of CANNIKIN and shallow Aleutian earthquakes , 1973, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[32]  T. Wallace,et al.  EVIDENCE OF TECTONIC RELEASE FROM UNDERGROUND NUCLEAR EXPLOSIONS IN LONG-PERIOD S WAVES , 1985 .

[33]  W. O. Wray,et al.  Seismic coupling from a nuclear explosion: the dependence of the reduced displacement potential on the nonlinear behavior of the near source rock environment. Topical report, Sep 1975 , 1975 .

[34]  H. C. Rodean,et al.  Nuclear-explosion seismology , 1971 .

[35]  D. E. Willis,et al.  Seismological aspects of the CANNIKIN nuclear explosion , 1972, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[36]  G. C. Werth,et al.  Comparison of amplitudes of seismic waves from nuclear explosions in four mediums , 1963 .

[37]  P. Molnar,et al.  Small Earthquakes and Explosions in Western North America recorded by New High Gain, Long Period Seismographs , 1969, Nature.

[38]  Excitation of surface waves by the Aleutian underground explosion Milrow (October 2, 1969) , 1971 .

[39]  Georg Goubau,et al.  On the Excitation of Surface Waves , 1952, Proceedings of the IRE.

[40]  David von Seggern,et al.  Theoretical and observed Rayleigh‐wave spectra for explosions and earthquakes , 1970 .

[41]  N. A. Haskell Analytic Approximation for the Elastic Radiation from a Contained Underground Explosion , 1967 .