Decomposing trends in attitudes toward gay marriage, 1988–2006.

Objective. The objective of this article is to examine the trend in attitudes toward gay marriage through the analysis of data from the General Social Survey. Methods. Using linear decomposition techniques, I explain the change in attitudes toward gay marriage from 1988 to 2006. Results. Attitudes significantly liberalized over time; 71 percent opposed gay marriage in 1988, but by 2006, this figure dropped to 52 percent. Approximately two-thirds of this change was due to an intracohort change effect, or individuals' modifying their views over time, and one-third was due to a cohort succession effect, or later cohorts replacing earlier ones. This pattern was replicated across many subgroups of the U.S. public, including age, sex, residential, educational, and religious groups. Conclusion. The results suggest that the use of the “equality/tolerance” framing of gay marriage by its supporters and other societal events or “moments” may have convinced some people who used to disapprove of gay marriage in 1988 to approve of it by 2006.

[1]  D. Mckie,et al.  Talking Politics , 1975, The Lancet.

[2]  Glenn Firebaugh,et al.  Trends in Antiblack Prejudice, 1972-1984: Region and Cohort Effects , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  G. Firebaugh,et al.  Methods for estimating cohort replacement effects. , 1989, Sociological methodology.

[4]  A. Yang.  Trends: Attitudes Toward Homosexuality , 1997 .

[5]  G. V. Donnenwerth,et al.  Religion and declining support for traditional beliefs about gender roles and homosexual rights , 1998 .

[6]  Gregory M. Herek,et al.  The Psychology of Sexual Prejudice , 2000 .

[7]  Mark Regnerus,et al.  The Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the Art , 2000 .

[8]  J. Loftus.  America's Liberalization in Attitudes toward Homosexuality, 1973 TO 1998 , 2001, American Sociological Review.

[9]  K. Hull.  The Political Limits of the Rights Frame: The Case of Same-Sex Marriage in Hawaii , 2001 .

[10]  Tina Fetner.  Working Anita Bryant: The Impact of Christian Anti-Gay Activism on Lesbian and Gay Movement Claims , 2001 .

[11]  J. Treas.  How Cohorts, Education, and Ideology Shaped a New Sexual Revolution on American Attitudes toward Nonmarital Sex, 1972–1998 , 2002 .

[12]  B. Adam.  The Defense of Marriage Act and American Exceptionalism: The "Gay Marriage" Panic in the United States , 2003 .

[13]  Joseph N. Cappella,et al.  Framing Public Discussion of Gay Civil Unions , 2005 .

[14]  P. Brewer,et al.  Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions , 2005 .

[15]  Miriam O. Smith.  The Politics of Same-Sex Marriage in Canada and the United States , 2005, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[16]  Michael D. Martinez,et al.  Core Values, Value Conflict, and Citizens’ Ambivalence about Gay Rights , 2005 .

[17]  Gregory B. Lewis.  Same-Sex Marriage and the 2004 Presidential Election , 2005, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[18]  Benjamin J. Lovett,et al.  Moral Values, Moralism, and the 2004 Presidential Election , 2005 .

[19]  Erin Ruel,et al.  Homophobia and HIV/AIDS: Attitude Change in the Face of an Epidemic , 2006 .

[20]  Tien-Tsung Lee,et al.  Public Attitudes Toward Gays and Lesbians , 2006, Journal of homosexuality.

[21]  Wendy Cadge,et al.  Religion and Public Opinion about Same-Sex Marriage , 2006 .

[22]  K. Luker.  When Sex Goes to School: Warring Views on Sex--and Sex Education--Since the Sixties , 2007 .

[23]  R. Andersen,et al.  Cohort Differences in Tolerance of Homosexuality: Attitudinal Change in Canada and the United States, 1981-2000 , 2008 .