The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds.
暂无分享,去创建一个
S. Bacon | J. Opie | D. Montoya | S. P. Bacon
[1] G. A. Miller. The masking of speech. , 1947, Psychological bulletin.
[2] G. A. Miller,et al. The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech , 1948 .
[3] Mark B. Gardner,et al. Loudness Patterns—A New Approach , 1949 .
[4] S. S. Stevens,et al. The Masking of Pure Tones and of Speech by White Noise , 1950 .
[5] R. Plomp. Rate of Decay of Auditory Sensation , 1964 .
[6] T W Tillman,et al. Perceptual masking in multiple sound backgrounds. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[7] R. H. Wilson,et al. Influence of pulsed masking on the threshold for spondees. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] H. Levitt. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[9] N. Viemeister. Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] W. Jesteadt,et al. Forward masking as a function of frequency, masker level, and signal delay. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] N. Viemeister,et al. Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[12] D D Dirks,et al. Articulation index predictions of contextually dependent words. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] R L Freyman,et al. Temporal resolution in sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] B. Moore,et al. Gap detection and masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] J M Festen,et al. Difficulties with speech intelligibility in noise in spite of a normal pure-tone audiogram. , 1990, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[16] R. Plomp,et al. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] R Plomp,et al. Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] S P Bacon,et al. Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[19] S. Arlinger,et al. Normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects' ability to just follow conversation in competing speech, reversed speech, and noise backgrounds. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[20] Stuart Rosen,et al. THE PERCEPTION OF SPEECH IN FLUCTUATING NOISE , 1993 .
[21] J M Festen. Contributions of comodulation masking release and temporal resolution to the speech-reception threshold masked by an interfering voice. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] Phillips Dp,et al. Impaired Word Recognition in Noise by Patients with Noise-Induced Cochlear Hearing-Loss - Contribution of Temporal Resolution Defect , 1994 .
[23] D P Phillips,et al. Auditory temporal resolution in multiple sclerosis. , 1994, The Journal of otolaryngology.
[24] P E Souza,et al. Masking of speech in young and elderly listeners with hearing loss. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[25] H. Gustafsson,et al. Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] Speech recognition thresholds in temporally complex backgrounds: Effects of hearing loss and noise masking , 1994 .
[27] S. Soli,et al. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[28] D D Dirks,et al. Speech recognition in amplitude-modulated noise of listeners with normal and listeners with impaired hearing. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[29] D P Phillips,et al. Word recognition performance in continuous and interrupted broad-band noise by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners. , 1995, The American journal of otology.
[30] Andrew Stuart,et al. Word Recognition in Continuous and Interrupted Broadband Noise by Young Normal‐Hearing, Older Normal‐Hearing, and Presbyacusic Listeners , 1996, Ear and hearing.
[31] The modulated-unmodulated difference: effects of signal frequency and masker modulation depth. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] S P Bacon,et al. Masking by modulated and unmodulated noise: effects of bandwidth, modulation rate, signal frequency, and masker level. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.