A Randomized Clinical Trial to Reduce Patient Prehospital Delay to Treatment in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Background—Delay from onset of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) symptoms to hospital admission continues to be prolonged. To date, community education campaigns on the topic have had disappointing results. Therefore, we conducted a clinical randomized trial to test whether an intervention tailored specifically for patients with ACS and delivered one-on-one would reduce prehospital delay time. Methods and Results—Participants (n=3522) with documented coronary heart disease were randomized to experimental (n=1777) or control (n=1745) groups. Experimental patients received education and counseling about ACS symptoms and actions required. Patients had a mean age of 67±11 years, and 68% were male. Over the 2 years of follow-up, 565 patients (16.0%) were admitted to an emergency department with ACS symptoms a total of 842 times. Neither median prehospital delay time (experimental, 2.20 versus control, 2.25 hours) nor emergency medical system use (experimental, 63.6% versus control, 66.9%) was different between groups, although experimental patients were more likely than control to call the emergency medical system if the symptoms occurred within the first 6 months following the intervention (P=0.036). Experimental patients were significantly more likely to take aspirin after symptom onset than control patients (experimental, 22.3% versus control, 10.1%, P=0.02). The intervention did not result in an increase in emergency department use (experimental, 14.6% versus control, 17.5%). Conclusions—The education and counseling intervention did not lead to reduced prehospital delay or increased ambulance use. Reducing the time from onset of ACS symptoms to arrival at the hospital continues to be a significant public health challenge. Clinical Trial Registration—clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier NCT00734760.

[1]  R. Schiele,et al.  Impact of prehospital delay on mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolysis. , 2001, American heart journal.

[2]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[3]  H A Feldman,et al.  Effect of a community intervention on patient delay and emergency medical service use in acute coronary heart disease: The Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) Trial. , 2000, JAMA.

[4]  M. Eisenberg,et al.  Delay between onset of chest pain and seeking medical care: the effect of public education. , 1989, Annals of emergency medicine.

[5]  Kathleen Dracup,et al.  Australian patients' delay in response to heart attack symptoms , 1997, The Medical journal of Australia.

[6]  A. Sowden,et al.  Systematic review of interventions to reduce delay in patients with suspected heart attack , 2004, Emergency Medicine Journal.

[7]  L. Chambless,et al.  Trends in prehospital delay time and use of emergency medical services for acute myocardial infarction: experience in 4 US communities from 1987-2000. , 2005, American heart journal.

[8]  J. Rawles,et al.  Quantification of the benefit of earlier thrombolytic therapy: five-year results of the Grampian Region Early Anistreplase Trial (GREAT). , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  J. Gurwitz,et al.  Delayed Hospital Presentation in Patients Who Have Had Acute Myocardial Infarction , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[10]  J. Gurwitz,et al.  Duration of, and temporal trends (1994-1997) in, prehospital delay in patients with acute myocardial infarction: the second National Registry of Myocardial Infarction. , 1999, Archives of internal medicine.

[11]  David Brieger,et al.  Extent of, and factors associated with, delay to hospital presentation in patients with acute coronary disease (the GRACE registry). , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  V. Fuster,et al.  Aspirin as a therapeutic agent in cardiovascular disease: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. , 1997, Circulation.

[13]  D. Moser,et al.  An international perspective on the time to treatment for acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[14]  B. Riegel,et al.  A Nursing Intervention to Reduce Prehospital Delay in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2006, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[15]  William J. Rogers,et al.  Use of Emergency Medical Services in Acute Myocardial Infarction and Subsequent Quality of Care: Observations From the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 , 2002, Circulation.

[16]  J. Manson,et al.  Comparison of delay times to hospital presentation for physicians and nonphysicians with acute myocardial infarction. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  J. Kragstrup,et al.  Patient delay from onset of chest pain suggesting acute coronary syndrome to hospital admission. , 2003, Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ.

[18]  B. Riegel,et al.  Psychometric evaluation of the Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Response Index. , 2007, Research in nursing & health.

[19]  K. Furie,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. , 2008, Circulation.

[20]  J. Ornato,et al.  The Physician's Role in Minimizing Prehospital Delay in Patients at High Risk for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Recommendations from the National Heart Attack Alert Program , 1997, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[21]  C. Glueck,et al.  Gemfibrozil-lovastatin therapy for primary hyperlipoproteinemias. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[22]  D. Cone,et al.  Use of emergency medical services in acute myocardial infarction and subsequent quality of care: Observations from the national registry of myocardial infarction 2 , 2004 .

[23]  B. Riegel,et al.  Acute coronary syndrome: what do patients know? , 2008, Archives of internal medicine.

[24]  A. Go,et al.  Reducing Delay in Seeking Treatment by Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Stroke: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Nursing and Stroke Council* , 2006, Circulation.

[25]  M. Drazner,et al.  Assessing prognosis in heart failure: is hepatocyte growth factor the next B-type natriuretic peptide? , 2005, American heart journal.

[26]  George D. Kitas,et al.  The common-sense model of self-regulation of health and illness: how can we use it to understand and respond to our patients' needs? , 2007, Rheumatology.