Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to the Middle Frontal Gyrus During Attention Modes Induced Dynamic Module Reconfiguration in Brain Networks

The interaction between dorsal and ventral attention networks (VANs) is mediated by the middle frontal gyrus (MFG), which is functionally connected to both networks. However, the direct role of the MFG in selective and sustained attention remains controversial. In the current study, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG) to probe the connectivity dynamic changes of MFG-associated regions during different attention modes. The participants underwent visual, selective, and sustained attention tasks to observe TMS-induced network changes. Twenty healthy participants received single-pulse TMS over the left or right MFG during tasks, while synchronous EEG data was acquired. Behavioral results were recorded and time-varying brain network analyses were performed. We found that the MFG is involved in attention processing and that sustained attention was preferentially controlled by the right MFG. Moreover, compared with the right hemisphere, the left hemisphere was associated with selective attention tasks. Visual and selective attention tasks induced MFG-related changes in network nodes were within the left hemisphere; however, sustained attention induced changes in network nodes were in the bilateral posterior MFG. Our findings indicated that the MFG plays a crucial role in regulating attention networks. In particular, TMS-induced MFG alterations influenced key nodes of the time-varying brain network, leading to the reorganization of brain network modules.

[1]  Elia Formisano,et al.  Hemispheric Differences in the Voluntary Control of Spatial Attention: Direct Evidence for a Right-Hemispheric Dominance within Frontal Cortex , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  C D Frith,et al.  Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  Kewei Chen,et al.  Rich club disturbances of the human connectome from subjective cognitive decline to Alzheimer's disease , 2018, Theranostics.

[4]  Ralph-Axel Müller,et al.  Atypical attentional networks and the emergence of autism , 2013, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[5]  Elizabeth W. Pang,et al.  From Structure to Circuits: The Contribution of MEG Connectivity Studies to Functional Neurosurgery , 2016, Front. Neuroanat..

[6]  Luyao Wang,et al.  Beta-Band Functional Connectivity Influences Audiovisual Integration in Older Age: An EEG Study , 2017, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[7]  Bin He,et al.  An Adaptive Directed Transfer Function Approach for Detecting Dynamic Causal Interactions , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Prefrontal Parvalbumin Neurons in Control of Attention , 2016, Cell.

[9]  C. Caltagirone,et al.  Asymmetry of Parietal Interhemispheric Connections in Humans , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  G. Tononi,et al.  Breakdown of Cortical Effective Connectivity During Sleep , 2005, Science.

[11]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying the brain-behaviour relationship by induction of 'virtual lesions'. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[12]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2014, Neuromethods.

[13]  Girijesh Prasad,et al.  Propofol-induced sedation diminishes the strength of frontal-parietal-occipital EEG network , 2017, 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[14]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive neuroscience , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Martin Lotze,et al.  Effects of inhibitory theta burst TMS to different brain sites involved in visuospatial attention - a combined neuronavigated cTBS and behavioural study. , 2016, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[16]  Fei Wang,et al.  The Dynamic Brain Networks of Motor Imagery: Time-Varying Causality Analysis of Scalp EEG , 2019, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[17]  Nathan Caruana,et al.  A frontotemporoparietal network common to initiating and responding to joint attention bids , 2014, NeuroImage.

[18]  Daihong Liu,et al.  Disrupted local neural activity and functional connectivity in subjective tinnitus patients: evidence from resting-state fMRI study , 2018, Neuroradiology.

[19]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Activation of frontal premotor areas during suprathreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left primary sensorimotor cortex: A glucose metabolic PET study , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[20]  L. Kooistra,et al.  Differentiating attention deficits in children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder or attention‐deficit–hyperactivity disorder , 2010, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[21]  Fang Fang,et al.  Sequential sampling of visual objects during sustained attention , 2017, PLoS biology.

[22]  Maria Theodorou,et al.  Your Brain on the Movies: A Computational Approach for Predicting Box-office Performance from Viewer’s Brain Responses to Movie Trailers , 2017, Front. Neuroinform..

[23]  Tao Zhang,et al.  The Time-Varying Networks in P300: A Task-Evoked EEG Study , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[24]  Yi Liang,et al.  Time-Varying Networks of Inter-Ictal Discharging Reveal Epileptogenic Zone , 2017, Front. Comput. Neurosci..

[25]  Chikashi Michimata,et al.  Spatial distribution of attention and inter-hemispheric competition , 2015, Cognitive Processing.

[26]  S. Carlson,et al.  Neural Substrate for Metacognitive Accuracy of Tactile Working Memory , 2017, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  BrainMap , 2007, Neuroinformatics.

[28]  Katarzyna J. Blinowska,et al.  A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures , 1991, Biological Cybernetics.

[29]  Tianzi Jiang,et al.  The Neuroanatomical Basis for Posterior Superior Parietal Lobule Control Lateralization of Visuospatial Attention , 2016, Front. Neuroanat..

[30]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience – virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[31]  S. Holland,et al.  Differential patterns of brain activation over time in adolescents with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) during performance of a sustained attention task. , 2009, Neuropediatrics.

[32]  Deepak Joshi,et al.  Study of target and non-target interplay in spatial attention task , 2018, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[33]  Cedric E. Ginestet,et al.  Cognitive relevance of the community structure of the human brain functional coactivation network , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Spatial neglect and attention networks. , 2011, Annual review of neuroscience.

[35]  A. Scholey,et al.  Functional Activation during the Rapid Visual Information Processing Task in a Middle Aged Cohort: An fMRI Study , 2015, PloS one.

[36]  Haruka Dan,et al.  Acute neuropharmacological effects of atomoxetine on inhibitory control in ADHD children: A fNIRS study , 2014, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[37]  J. O'reardon,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) in the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Pilot Study , 2012, The journal of ECT.

[38]  M. Catani,et al.  A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  C. Miniussi,et al.  New insights into rhythmic brain activity from TMS–EEG studies , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[41]  Nigel C Rogasch,et al.  Assessing cortical network properties using TMS–EEG , 2013, Human brain mapping.