Exploring the Concept of Fairness in Everyday, Imaginary and Robot Scenarios: A Cross-Cultural Study With Children in Japan and Uganda

This paper describes a cross-cultural pilot study on children’s perceptions of fairness in robot-related scenarios with children in Japan (N = 20) and Uganda (N = 24). We used storytelling to facilitate children’s narratives on fairness and to identify areas of alignment and disconnect. Initial results indicate that while both groups referred to similar aspects of fairness, namely psychological, physical and systemic, children in Tokyo focused more on psychological and mental aspects while children in Uganda emphasised on physical and material aspects. Both groups increased their emphasis on mental aspects in robot-related scenarios. All children expressed their interest to further explore fairness and unfairness as experienced by children with different cultural backgrounds and the need for inter-group contact. The results of this study will contribute to the first phase of a study with robots and children in relation to child’s fundamental rights and to the dialogue about the requirements for fairness in robot development by highlighting the importance of considering children’s perspectives especially those of typically under-represented cultural groups.

[1]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Fair Is Not Fair Everywhere , 2015, Psychological science.

[2]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Designing and Developing Better Robots for Children: A Fundamental Human Rights Perspective , 2021, HRI.

[3]  J. Stevenson The cultural origins of human cognition , 2001 .

[4]  Keisuke Nakamura,et al.  Haru: Hardware Design of an Experimental Tabletop Robot Assistant , 2018, HRI.

[5]  James Zou,et al.  AI can be sexist and racist — it’s time to make it fair , 2018, Nature.

[6]  Suresh Venkatasubramanian,et al.  On the (im)possibility of fairness , 2016, ArXiv.

[7]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  A Model-Free Affective Reinforcement Learning Approach to Personalization of an Autonomous Social Robot Companion for Early Literacy Education , 2019, AAAI.

[8]  Anna Jobin,et al.  The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines , 2019, Nature Machine Intelligence.

[9]  F. Warneken,et al.  The ontogeny of fairness in seven societies , 2015, Nature.

[10]  F. Baum,et al.  Participatory action research , 2006, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[11]  Maria Paz Cadena,et al.  Beyond the 'east-west' dichotomy: Global variation in cultural models of selfhood. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  Vicky Charisi,et al.  Child-Robot Collaborative Problem-Solving and the Importance of Child's Voluntary Interaction: A Developmental Perspective , 2020, Frontiers in Robotics and AI.

[13]  M. Tomasello The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition , 2000 .

[14]  F. Caballero,et al.  The Effects of Robot Cognitive Reliability and Social Positioning on Child-Robot Team Dynamics , 2021, 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[15]  M. Killen,et al.  Children's understanding of equity in the context of inequality. , 2016, The British journal of developmental psychology.

[16]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Social robots for education: A review , 2018, Science Robotics.

[17]  Wafa Johal,et al.  Research Trends in Social Robots for Learning , 2020, Current Robotics Reports.

[18]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  It Does Not Matter Who You Are: Fairness in Pre-schoolers Interacting with Human and Robotic Partners , 2019, International Journal of Social Robotics.