Levelling up – Is it the right cure?

In medicine, treatment normally starts with an examination of symptoms followed by a diagnosis of their likely cause and then a ‘cure’ to counter that cause. In the case of ‘Levelling Up’, the symptoms presented appear to be significant disparities in economic vitality between different areas – but a diagnosis of the cause is not clearly indicated. However, if the recommendation amounts essentially to encouraging private sector growth in under-performing places by pump-priming infrastructure schemes, (for instance, investment funds, education, skills, health care, local leadership and community pride), that might suggest a diagnosis that the under-performance occurs because entrepreneurial endeavour is constrained by infrastructural deficiencies. That diagnosis fits the conventional wisdom but is it correct? The rationale appears to be based on an assumption that the better the infrastructure the more entrepreneurial endeavour there will be – but many commentators indicate that humans are more influenced by historic, cultural and/or social norms than by such considerations. Therefore, continuing to fund infrastructure is unlikely to change the situation. Although that does not itself indicate what might be the answer – or even that a quick solution is possible. But it does suggest both the necessity to look and possible avenues to explore.

[1]  K. Schweizer The Scientific Attitude: Defending Science from Denial, Fraud and Pseudoscience , 2022, The European Legacy.

[2]  J. Reades,et al.  Why Face-to-Face Still Matters , 2021 .

[3]  International Compendium of Entrepreneurship Policies , 2020, OECD Studies on SMEs and Entrepreneurship.

[4]  M. Fritsch,et al.  Persistence of Entrepreneurship in Different Historical Contexts , 2019 .

[5]  Alistair R. Anderson,et al.  Entrepreneurial engagement in a depleted small town: Legitimacy and embeddedness , 2018, Journal of Management & Organization.

[6]  I. McGilchrist,et al.  Divided brain, divided world* , 2018 .

[7]  Carole Howorth,et al.  The crafting of an (un)enterprising community: Context and the social practice of talk , 2017 .

[8]  D. Storey,et al.  Persistence and change in interregional differences in entrepreneurship: England and Wales, 1921–2011 , 2017 .

[9]  Ewald Kibler,et al.  Place attachment and social legitimacy: Revisiting the sustainable entrepreneurship journey , 2015 .

[10]  P. Reynolds Business Creation Stability: Why is it so hard to increase entrepreneurship? , 2015 .

[11]  Georgios Fotopoulos,et al.  On the spatial stickiness of UK new firm formation rates , 2014 .

[12]  Alistair R. Anderson,et al.  From admiration to abhorrence: the contentious appeal of entrepreneurship across Europe , 2013 .

[13]  Victor W. Hwang,et al.  The Rainforest: The Secret to Building the Next Silicon Valley , 2012 .

[14]  W. Dennis Entrepreneurship, Small Business and Public Policy Levers , 2011 .

[15]  Shailendra Kadre,et al.  Understanding Enterprise IT , 2011 .

[16]  Martin Andersson,et al.  Sources of persistence in regional start-up rates--evidence from Sweden , 2009 .

[17]  Bernard Cova,et al.  Tribal marketing: The tribalisation of society and its impact on the conduct of marketing , 2002 .

[18]  R. Atkinson,et al.  Area effects: what do they mean for British housing and regeneration policy? , 2002 .

[19]  W. Baumol Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  S. Checkland,et al.  The Upas Tree: Glasgow, 1875-1975. A Study in Growth and Contraction. , 1977 .