Orthonormal Transform to Decompose the Variance of a Life‐History Trait across a Phylogenetic Tree

In recent years, there has been an increased interest in studying the variability of a quantitative life-history trait across a set of species sharing a common phylogeny. However, such studies have suffered from an insufficient development of statistical methods aimed at decomposing the trait variance with respect to the topological structure of the tree. Here we propose a new and generic approach that expresses the topological properties of the phylogenetic tree via an orthonormal basis, which is further used to decompose the trait variance. Such a decomposition provides a structure function, referred to as an "orthogram," which is relevant to characterize in both graphical and statistical aspects the dependence of trait values on the topology of the tree ("phylogenetic dependence"). We also propose four complementary test statistics to be computed from orthogram values that help to diagnose both the intensity and the nature of phylogenetic dependence. The relevance of the method is illustrated by the analysis of three phylogenetic data sets, drawn from the literature and typifying contrasted levels and aspects of phylogenetic dependence. Freely available routines which have been programmed in the R framework are also proposed.

[1]  Hans Wackernagel,et al.  Multivariate Geostatistics: An Introduction with Applications , 1996 .

[2]  R. Sabatier,et al.  Comparative analysis of phylogenetic and fishing effects in life history patterns of teleost fishes , 2000 .

[3]  E. N. Adams Consensus Techniques and the Comparison of Taxonomic Trees , 1972 .

[4]  Andy Purvis,et al.  Phylogenetic supertrees: Assembling the trees of life. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[5]  Michael Doob,et al.  Spectra of graphs , 1980 .

[6]  Multivariate Geostatistics , 2004 .

[7]  P. Diggle Time Series: A Biostatistical Introduction , 1990 .

[8]  W. Cleveland The elements of graphing data , 1986 .

[9]  Todd R. Ogden,et al.  Wavelet Methods for Time Series Analysis , 2002 .

[10]  Brian D. Ripley,et al.  Spatial Statistics: Ripley/Spatial Statistics , 2005 .

[11]  Ross Ihaka,et al.  Gentleman R: R: A language for data analysis and graphics , 1996 .

[12]  R. Díaz-Uriarte,et al.  Covariation of Life-History Traits in Lacertid Lizards: A Comparative Study , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[13]  C. Thacker,et al.  RATES OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION: Phylogenetic Issues and Applications , 1996 .

[14]  J. Keith Ord,et al.  Spatial Processes Models and Applications , 1981 .

[15]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  COMPARATIVE METHODS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF CONTINUOUS VARIABLES: GEOMETRIC INTERPRETATIONS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  D. Harville Matrix Algebra From a Statistician's Perspective , 1998 .

[17]  A. Walden,et al.  Wavelet Methods for Time Series Analysis , 2000 .

[18]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[19]  Graham Bell,et al.  A Comparative Method , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[20]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Is sex-biased maternal care limited by total maternal expenditure in polygynous ungulates? , 1995, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[21]  P. Legendre Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm? , 1993 .

[22]  M. Pagel,et al.  The comparative method in evolutionary biology , 1991 .

[23]  T. Garland,et al.  TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[25]  E. Svensson The spped of life-history evolution. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  Martin Greiner,et al.  Wavelets , 2018, Complex..

[27]  P. Jouventin,et al.  Mate fidelity in monogamous birds: a re-examination of the Procellariiformes , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  Mark Kot,et al.  Adaptation: Statistics and a Null Model for Estimating Phylogenetic Effects , 1990 .