Extracting synergies in gait: using EMG variability to evaluate control strategies.

There has been extensive debate as to whether muscle synergies in motor tasks reflect underlying neural organization or simply correlations in muscle activity that are imposed by the task. One possible means of distinguishing these two alternatives is through the analysis of variability in the electromyogram (EMG). Here, we simulated EMG in eight lower-limb muscles and introduced hypothetical neural coupling between specific muscle groups. Neural coupling was simulated by introducing correlations in the neural activation commands to different muscles (positive, negative, or zero coupling). When the entire EMG signal was used for analysis, the extracted synergies reflected only simultaneous muscle activity, regardless of the neural coupling between the muscles. On the other hand, examining the variability in the EMG after subtracting the ensemble average was successful in identifying the simulated neural coupling. The extracted synergies from these two methods were also different when we analyzed data from participants during treadmill walking. The results emphasize the importance of examining EMG variability to understand the neural basis of muscle synergies.

[1]  A. Hof,et al.  Speed dependence of averaged EMG profiles in walking. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[2]  M. Latash,et al.  Structure of motor variability in marginally redundant multifinger force production tasks , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  Merging of healthy motor modules predicts reduced locomotor performance and muscle coordination complexity post-stroke. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning , 1998, Nature.

[5]  Dario Farina,et al.  A novel approach for precise simulation of the EMG signal detected by surface electrodes , 2001, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng..

[6]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Stability of muscle synergies for voluntary actions after cortical stroke in humans , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[8]  Paola Cesari,et al.  Body-goal Variability Mapping in an Aiming Task , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  W. Rymer,et al.  Endpoint force fluctuations reveal flexible rather than synergistic patterns of muscle cooperation. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Emilio Bizzi,et al.  Combinations of muscle synergies in the construction of a natural motor behavior , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  Modular control of human walking: a simulation study. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Toward a new theory of motor synergies. , 2007, Motor control.

[15]  J. Perry,et al.  Gait Analysis , 2024 .

[16]  L. Ting,et al.  Functional muscle synergies constrain force production during postural tasks. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Lena H Ting,et al.  Subject-specific muscle synergies in human balance control are consistent across different biomechanical contexts. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  M. T. Turvey,et al.  Issues in the theory of action : Degree of freedom, coordinative structures and coalitions , 1978 .

[19]  J. Foley The co-ordination and regulation of movements , 1968 .

[20]  D. Winter,et al.  EMG profiles during normal human walking: stride-to-stride and inter-subject variability. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Constraints on the Development of Coordination , 1986 .

[22]  Rajiv Ranganathan,et al.  Influence of Augmented Feedback on Coordination Strategies , 2009, Journal of motor behavior.

[23]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Motor patterns in human walking and running. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  G Zilvold,et al.  Estimation uncertainty in ensemble averaged surface EMG profiles during gait. , 1994, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[25]  Jonathan B. Dingwell,et al.  Do Humans Optimally Exploit Redundancy to Control Step Variability in Walking? , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[26]  Emanuel Todorov,et al.  Structured variability of muscle activations supports the minimal intervention principle of motor control. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Five basic muscle activation patterns account for muscle activity during human locomotion , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  Jason J Kutch,et al.  Muscle redundancy does not imply robustness to muscle dysfunction. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  M. Tresch,et al.  The case for and against muscle synergies , 2022 .

[30]  James M Wakeling,et al.  Neuromechanics of muscle synergies during cycling. , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  Vladimir M. Zatsiorsky,et al.  Muscle synergies during shifts of the center of pressure by standing persons , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  Modular control of human walking: Adaptations to altered mechanical demands. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  Rajiv Ranganathan,et al.  Motor synergies: feedback and error compensation within and between trials , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  W. Rymer,et al.  Characteristics of synergic relations during isometric contractions of human elbow muscles. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.