Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management

We present a novel approach to visually locate bodies of research within the sciences, both at each moment of time and dynamically. This article describes how this approach fits with other efforts to locally and globally map scientific outputs. We then show how these science overlay maps help benchmark, explore collaborations, and track temporal changes, using examples of universities, corporations, funding agencies, and research topics. We address conditions of application, with their advantages, downsides and limitations. Overlay maps especially help investigate the increasing number of scientific developments and organisations that do not fit within traditional disciplinary categories. We make these tools accessible to help researchers explore the ongoing socio-cognitive transformation of science and technology systems.

[1]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Using detailed maps of science to identify potential collaborations , 2009, Scientometrics.

[2]  Wolfgang Krohn,et al.  Geplante Forschung : vergleichende Studien über den Einfluß politischer Programme auf die Wissenschaftsentwicklung , 1979 .

[3]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Interdisciplinary dynamics of modern science: analysis of cross-disciplinary citation flows , 2000 .

[4]  Michael A. Rodriguez,et al.  Clickstream Data Yields High-Resolution Maps of Science , 2009, PloS one.

[5]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations using the Journal Citation Reports? , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  Patrick Llerena,et al.  Interdisciplinary Research and the Organization of the University: General Challenges and a Case Study , 2003 .

[7]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Toward a consensus map of science , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research , 1996, Scientometrics.

[9]  A. Elzinga.  The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1997 .

[10]  Stephen J. Bensman,et al.  Classification and powerlaws: The logarithmic transformation , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Luisa Calè,et al.  The Disorder of Things , 2011 .

[13]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Domain visualization using VxInsight® for science and technology management , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[14]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time , 2009, Scientometrics.

[15]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Toward an objective, reliable and accurate method for measuring research leadership , 2010, Scientometrics.

[16]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity , 2007, Scientometrics.

[17]  A. Stirling.  A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[18]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995 , 1998 .

[19]  Bart De Moor,et al.  Hybrid clustering for validation and improvement of subject-classification schemes , 2009, Inf. Process. Manag..

[20]  T. Lenoir.  Instituting Science: The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines , 1997 .

[21]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Various methods for the mapping of science , 1987, Scientometrics.

[22]  Loet Leydesdorff.  Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organization , 1989 .

[23]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science , 2002, Scientometrics.

[24]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[25]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Mapping Change in Scientific Specialties: A Scientometric Reconstruction of the Development of Artificial Intelligence , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[26]  María Bordons,et al.  Analysis of Cross-Disciplinary Research Through Bibliometric Tools , 2004 .

[27]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[28]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  Monitoring Scientific Developments from a Dynamic Perspective: Self-Organized Structuring to Map Neural Network Research , 1998, Journal of the American Society for Information Science.

[29]  David Roessner,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative methods and measures in the evaluation of research , 2000 .

[30]  D J PRICE,et al.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. , 1965, Science.

[31]  Derek deS. Price,et al.  The Science/Technology Relationship, the Craft of Experimental Science, and Policy for the Improvement of High Technology Innovation : Research Policy , 1987 .

[32]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Mapping Change in Large Networks , 2008, PloS one.

[33]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience , 2009, Scientometrics.

[34]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Indicators of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Diversity, centrality, and citations , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[35]  H. V. Lente,et al.  Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda , 2008 .

[36]  H. Simon,et al.  The Organization of Complex Systems , 1977 .

[37]  David J. Stump,et al.  The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power , 1998 .

[38]  A. Young.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. , 2001 .

[39]  C. M. Noyons.  Science Maps Within a Science Policy Context , 2004 .

[40]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[41]  P. Weingart.  2. Interdisciplinarity: The Paradoxical Discourse , 2000 .

[42]  Douglas J. Klein,et al.  Is chemistry 'The Central Science'? How are different sciences related? Co-citations, reductionism, emergence, and posets , 2006, Scientometrics.

[43]  J. Dupré.  The disorder of things : metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science , 1994 .

[44]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Problems with the ‘measurement’ of national scientific performance , 1988 .

[45]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  Beyond the citation debate: towards a sociology of measurement technologies and their use in science policy , 1991 .

[46]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Visualizing knowledge domains , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[47]  W. Wulf,et al.  Collaborative Research across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries , 2008 .

[48]  Tim Peacock,et al.  Charting the decline in British science , 1985, Nature.

[49]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Combining Mapping and Citation Analysis for Evaluative Bibliometric Purposes: A Bibliometric Study , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[50]  Arie Rip,et al.  Qualitative conditions of scientometrics: The new challenges , 2006, Scientometrics.

[51]  D. Hicks.  Limitations of Co-Citation Analysis as a Tool for Science Policy , 1987 .

[52]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Tracking areas of strategic importance using scientometric journal mappings , 1994 .

[53]  Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez,et al.  Visualizing the marrow of science , 2007 .

[54]  L. Butler,et al.  Institutions and the map of science: matching university departments and fields of research , 1998 .

[55]  Bart Nooteboom,et al.  Optimal Cognitive Distance and Absorptive Capacity , 2005 .

[56]  P. Kivisto.  Chaos of disciplines , 2002 .

[57]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  How cross-disciplinary is bionanotechnology? Explorations in the specialty of molecular motors , 2007, Scientometrics.

[58]  Alexander I. Pudovkin,et al.  Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[59]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[60]  A. Stirling.  “Opening Up” and “Closing Down” , 2008 .

[61]  Julie Thompson Klein,et al.  1. A Conceptual Vocabulary of Interdisciplinary Science , 2000 .

[62]  Henry Small.  Visualizing science by citation mapping , 1999 .

[63]  Jan Youtie,et al.  Where does nanotechnology belong in the map of science? , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[64]  H. Maturana.  The tree of knowledge , 1987 .

[65]  Zaida Chinchilla-Rodríguez,et al.  A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the cocitation of classes and categories , 2004, Scientometrics.

[66]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Mapping the structure and evolution of chemistry research , 2009, Scientometrics.

[67]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The development of frames of references , 1986, Scientometrics.

[68]  Satoru Kawai,et al.  An Algorithm for Drawing General Undirected Graphs , 1989, Inf. Process. Lett..

[69]  J. S. Katz,et al.  The self-similar science system , 1999 .

[70]  Diana Lucio-Arias,et al.  Knowledge emergence in scientific communication: from “fullerenes” to “nanotubes” , 2007, Scientometrics.

[71]  G. Lewison,et al.  Mapping the emergence and development of translational cancer research. , 2006, European journal of cancer.

[72]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Vosviewer: A Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping , 2009 .

[73]  Ed C. M. Noyons,et al.  Bibliometric mapping of science in a policy context , 2004, Scientometrics.

[74]  I. Ràfols,et al.  STRATEGIES FOR KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION IN BIONANOTECHNOLOGY , 2007 .

[75]  Stephen J. Bensman.  Garfield and the impact factor , 2007 .

[76]  Michel Zitt,et al.  Indicators in a research institute: A multi-level classification of scientific journals , 1999, Scientometrics.

[77]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis, I. Structural aspects , 1991, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[78]  Maureen A. O’Malley,et al.  Prokaryotic evolution and the tree of life are two different things , 2009, Biology Direct.

[79]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. II: Dynamical aspects , 1991 .

[80]  Stephen J. Bensman,et al.  Definition and identification of journals as bibliographic and subject entities: Librarianship versus ISI Journal Citation Reports methods and their effect on citation measures , 2009 .

[81]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  Quasi-correspondence analysis on scientometric transaction matrices , 2005, Scientometrics.

[82]  Michel Zitt,et al.  Development of a method for detection and trend analysis of research fronts built by lexical or cocitation analysis , 1994, Scientometrics.

[83]  G. Laudel,et al.  The Social Construction Of Bibliometric Evaluations , 2007 .

[84]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[85]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[86]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Mapping the backbone of science , 2004, Scientometrics.

[87]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Hybrid Nanomaterials Research: Is it Really Interdisciplinary? , 2010 .

[88]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects , 2009 .

[89]  M. Callon,et al.  Mapping the dynamics of science and technology : sociology of science in the real world , 1988 .

[90]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Can epidemic models describe the diffusion of topics across disciplines? , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[91]  J. Bergh.  Optimal Diversity: Increasing Returns versus Recombinant Innovation , 2008 .

[92]  R. Whitley.  The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .

[93]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Thought leadership: A new indicator for national and institutional comparison , 2008, Scientometrics.

[94]  Severine Louvel.  Controverses sur la science. Pour une sociologie transversaliste de l'activité scientifique, Terry Shinn, Pascal Ragouet. Raisons d'agir, Paris (2005) , 2007 .

[95]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents , 1973, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[96]  T. V. Leeuwen,et al.  Assessment of the scientific basis of interdisciplinary, applied research: Application of bibliometric methods in Nutrition and Food Research , 2002 .

[97]  E. Holtzman,et al.  The Cancer Mission: Social Contexts of Biomedical Research , 1980 .

[98]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Clustering thescience citation index® using co-citations , 1985, Scientometrics.

[99]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Clustering the science citation index using co-citations. II. Mapping science , 1985, Scientometrics.

[100]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Can epidemic models describe the diffusion of research topics across disciplines , 2009 .

[101]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Clustering thescience citation index® using co-citations - I. A comparison of methods , 1985, Scientometrics.

[102]  H. Small.  A Co-Citation Model of a Scientific Specialty: A Longitudinal Study of Collagen Research , 1977 .