Numerical and experimental comparative performance analysis of emerging spherical-caged drones

Abstract As technology in the 21st century matures at a faster pace, one technology is taking major strides as an everyday utility: unmanned aerial vehicles. Spherical drones are an emerging technology to tackle environments that previous systems have had considerable trouble trying to navigate in. These systems have equal potential in both military and civilian applications. A spherical cage is designed for a traditional pusher quad-copter and fabricated out of low-cost 3D-printer materials including polylactic acid (PLA) and acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS). Autodesk Finite Element Analysis simulations are carried out to show stress and performance relations for the various material densities. Endurance and thrust to weight considerations are tested to further optimize the low-cost vehicle utilizing New Mexico State University's (NMSU) wind tunnel. The vehicle is also mounted to a thrust test stand from RCBenchmark that can measure RPM, power consumption, thrust, and torque. The effect of cage interference is compared with changing airflow interference so that different cage platforms can be installed for mission sets that require more protected or gapped configurations. Although every airframe will have slight changes in the methodology used for design, this reliable strategy can be the framework for future spherical drone prototyping.

[1]  Kazunori Ohno,et al.  Proposal and experimental validation of a design strategy for a UAV with a passive rotating spherical shell , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[2]  Hui Hu,et al.  An Experimental Investigation on Rotor-to-Rotor Interactions of Small UAV Propellers , 2017 .

[3]  Seokkwan Yoon,et al.  Computational Analysis of Multi-Rotor Flows , 2016 .

[4]  Dario Floreano,et al.  An origami-inspired cargo drone , 2017, 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[5]  Scott Thibault,et al.  CFD Simulation of a Quad-Rotor UAV with Rotors in Motion Explicitly Modeled Using an LBM Approach with Adaptive Refinement , 2017 .

[6]  Yoshiro Hada,et al.  Development and field test of novel two-wheeled UAV for bridge inspections , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[7]  Thomas H. Pulliam,et al.  Computations of Torque-Balanced Coaxial Rotor Flows , 2017 .

[8]  Patricia Ventura Diaz,et al.  High-Fidelity Computational Aerodynamics of Multi-Rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2018 .

[9]  Kyle Stelmack Weaponized Police Drones and Their Effect on Police Use of Force , 2015 .

[10]  Keita Higuchi,et al.  Shepherd pass: ability tuning for augmented sports using ball-shaped quadcopter , 2015, Advances in Computer Entertainment.

[11]  J. De Schutter,et al.  Influence of propeller configuration on propulsion system efficiency of multi-rotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[12]  J. G. A. van Houten,et al.  Large strain behaviour of polycarbonate , 1994 .

[13]  R. Cross Measurements of the horizontal coefficient of restitution for a superball and a tennis ball , 2002 .

[14]  Manikandan Ramasamy,et al.  Measurements Comparing Hover Performance of Single, Coaxial, Tandem, and Tilt-Rotor Configurations , 2013 .

[15]  Colin R. Theodore,et al.  Computational Aerodynamic Modeling of Small Quadcopter Vehicles , 2017 .

[16]  Jian Chen,et al.  The computational fluid dynamic modeling of downwash flow field for a six-rotor UAV , 2018 .

[17]  Dario Floreano,et al.  A Collision‐resilient Flying Robot , 2014, J. Field Robotics.

[18]  H. N. Shankar,et al.  Adaptive attitude control of the spherical drone on SO(3) , 2016, 2016 IEEE Distributed Computing, VLSI, Electrical Circuits and Robotics (DISCOVER).

[19]  Narayanan Komerath,et al.  Multirotor Drone Aerodynamic Interaction Investigation , 2018, Drones.

[20]  Daniel Farbman,et al.  Materials Testing of 3D Printed ABS and PLA Samples to Guide Mechanical Design , 2016 .

[21]  Nandeesh Hiremath,et al.  Aerodynamic Interactions Study on Low-Re Coaxial and Quad-Rotor Configurations , 2017 .

[22]  Jack W. Langelaan,et al.  An Investigation of the Behavior of a Coaxial Rotor in Descent and Ground Effect , 2019, AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum.