Low‐Input MNase Accessibility of Chromatin (Low‐Input MACC)

An understanding of the dynamic structural properties of chromatin requires techniques that allow the profiling of regions of both open and closed chromatin as well as the assessment of nucleosome occupancy. The recently developed MNase accessibility (MACC) technique allows for the simultaneous measurement of chromatin opening and compaction, as well as nucleosome occupancy, on a genome‐wide scale in a single assay. This article presents a low‐input MACC procedure that considerably extends the utility of the original MACC assay. Low‐input MACC generates high‐quality data using very low cell numbers (as few as 50 cells per titration point), making it ideal for samples obtained after fluorescence‐activated cell sorting or dissection, or in clinical settings. Moreover, low‐input MACC has significantly improved several steps of the initial method, offering a more rapid and robust methodology. © 2019 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[1]  M. Tolstorukov,et al.  Widespread changes in nucleosome accessibility without changes in nucleosome occupancy during a rapid transcriptional induction. , 2017, Genes & development.

[2]  S. Henikoff,et al.  Targeted in situ genome-wide profiling with high efficiency for low cell numbers , 2018, Nature Protocols.

[3]  Michael Y Tolstorukov,et al.  Regulated large-scale nucleosome density patterns and precise nucleosome positioning correlate with V(D)J recombination , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Peter J. Park,et al.  MNase titration reveals differences between nucleosome occupancy and chromatin accessibility , 2016, Nature Communications.

[5]  Sharon Y. R. Dent,et al.  Chromatin modifiers and remodellers: regulators of cellular differentiation , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[6]  M. Tolstorukov,et al.  Single‐Assay Profiling of Nucleosome Occupancy and Chromatin Accessibility , 2017, Current protocols in molecular biology.

[7]  R. Kornberg,et al.  Action of micrococcal nuclease on chromatin and the location of histone H1. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  M. Tolstorukov,et al.  Enhancer regions show high histone H3.3 turnover that changes during differentiation , 2016, eLife.

[9]  R. Chen,et al.  Nucleosome fragility reveals novel functional states of chromatin and poises genes for activation. , 2011, Genome research.

[10]  M. Tolstorukov,et al.  Multiplexed Illumina sequencing libraries from picogram quantities of DNA , 2013, BMC Genomics.

[11]  Helga Thorvaldsdóttir,et al.  Integrative Genomics Viewer , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome , 2009, Genome Biology.

[13]  Ji-ping Wang,et al.  Genome-wide Mapping of the Nucleosome Landscape by Micrococcal Nuclease and Chemical Mapping. , 2017, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[14]  S. Elgin,et al.  Micrococcal nuclease as a probe of DNA sequence organization and chromatin structure , 1981, Cell.

[15]  D. Moore Commonly used reagents and equipment. , 2001, Current protocols in molecular biology.

[16]  S. Henikoff,et al.  An efficient targeted nuclease strategy for high-resolution mapping of DNA binding sites , 2016, bioRxiv.

[17]  S. Adam,et al.  Nuclear protein import in permeabilized mammalian cells requires soluble cytoplasmic factors , 1990, The Journal of cell biology.

[18]  M. Buck,et al.  Chromatin accessibility: a window into the genome , 2014, Epigenetics & Chromatin.

[19]  Andrea Masotti,et al.  Telomere shortening and telomere position effect in mild ring 17 syndrome , 2014, Epigenetics & Chromatin.

[20]  Marcel Geertz,et al.  Two distinct promoter architectures centered on dynamic nucleosomes control ribosomal protein gene transcription , 2014, Genes & development.

[21]  D. Levy,et al.  Corrigendum: Diverse human extracellular RNAs are widely detected in human plasma , 2016, Nature Communications.