A closed-form approach for identification of dynamical contact parameters in spindle–holder–tool assemblies

Abstract Accurate identification of contact dynamics is very crucial in predicting the dynamic behavior and chatter stability of spindle–tool assemblies in machining centers. It is well known that the stability lobe diagrams used for predicting regenerative chatter vibrations can be obtained from the tool point frequency response function (FRF) of the system. As previously shown by the authors, contact dynamics at the spindle–holder and holder–tool interfaces as well as the dynamics of bearings affect the tool point FRF considerably. Contact stiffness and damping values alter the frequencies and peak values of dominant vibration modes, respectively. Fast and accurate identification of contact dynamics in spindle–tool assemblies has become an important issue in the recent years. In this paper, a new method for identifying contact dynamics in spindle–holder–tool assemblies from experimental measurements is presented. The elastic receptance coupling equations are employed in a simple manner and closed-form expressions are obtained for the stiffness and damping parameters of the joint of interest. Although this study focuses on the contact dynamics at the spindle–holder and holder–tool interfaces of the assembly, the identification approach proposed in this paper might as well be used for identifying the dynamical parameters of bearings, spindle–holder interface and as well as other critical joints. After presenting the mathematical theory, an analytical case study is given for demonstration of the identification approach. Experimental verification is provided for identification of the dynamical contact parameters at the holder–tool interface of a spindle–holder–tool assembly.

[1]  Hamid Ahmadian,et al.  Modelling machine tool dynamics using a distributed parameter tool–holder joint interface , 2007 .

[2]  Tony L. Schmitz,et al.  Predicting High-Speed Machining Dynamics by Substructure Analysis , 2000 .

[3]  Maria Lúcia Machado Duarte,et al.  ROTATIONAL DEGREES OF FREEDOM FOR STRUCTURAL COUPLING ANALYSIS VIA FINITE-DIFFERENCE TECHNIQUE WITH RESIDUAL COMPENSATION , 2000 .

[4]  Yusuf Altintas,et al.  Receptance coupling for end mills , 2003 .

[5]  Erhan Budak,et al.  Analytical modeling of spindle-tool dynamics on machine tools using Timoshenko beam model and receptance coupling for the prediction of tool point FRF , 2006 .

[6]  E. I. Rivin Influence of Toolholder Interfaces on Tooling Performance , 1993 .

[7]  S. Smith,et al.  The Effect of Drawbar Force on Metal Removal Rate in Milling , 1999 .

[8]  Tony L. Schmitz,et al.  Improving High-Speed Machining Material Removal Rates by Rapid Dynamic Analysis , 2001 .

[9]  Ioannis Minis,et al.  Analysis of Linear and Nonlinear Chatter in Milling , 1990 .

[10]  Eugene Rivin,et al.  Toolholder/Spindle Interfaces for CNC Machine Tools , 1995 .

[11]  Yusuf Altintas,et al.  Analytical Prediction of Chatter Stability in Milling—Part I: General Formulation , 1998 .

[12]  Yusuf Altintas,et al.  Analytical Prediction of Chatter Stability in Milling—Part II: Application of the General Formulation to Common Milling Systems , 1998 .

[13]  Evren Burcu Kivanc,et al.  Structural modeling of end mills for form error and stability analysis , 2004 .

[14]  R. Bishop,et al.  The Mechanics of Vibration , 2011 .

[15]  M. Weck,et al.  New interface machine/tool: hollow shank , 1994 .

[16]  J. Barbera,et al.  Contact mechanics , 1999 .

[17]  I. S. Solkolnikoff Mathematical theory of elasticity , 1974 .

[18]  Tony L. Schmitz,et al.  Shrink fit tool holder connection stiffness/damping modeling for frequency response prediction in milling , 2007 .

[19]  Eugene I. Rivin,et al.  Stiffness and Damping in Mechanical Design , 1999 .

[20]  A. Ertürka,et al.  Selection of design and operational parameters in spindle – holder – tool assemblies for maximum chatter stability by using a new analytical model , 2006 .

[21]  Yusuf Altintas,et al.  Analytical Prediction of Stability Lobes in Milling , 1995 .

[22]  A. Savitzky,et al.  Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures. , 1964 .

[23]  Tony L. Schmitz,et al.  Tool Point Frequency Response Prediction for High-Speed Machining by RCSA , 2001 .

[24]  Erhan Budak,et al.  Effect analysis of bearing and interface dynamics on tool point FRF for chatter stability in machine tools by using a new analytical model for spindle–tool assemblies , 2007 .

[25]  Yusuf Altintas,et al.  Manufacturing Automation: Metal Cutting Mechanics, Machine Tool Vibrations, and CNC Design , 2000 .

[26]  Erhan Budak,et al.  A Modeling Approach for Analysis and Improvement of Spindle-Holder-Tool Assembly Dynamics , 2006 .

[27]  David J. Ewins,et al.  SUBSTRUCTURE SYNTHESIS VIA ELASTIC MEDIA , 2002 .