Reactive power planning with voltage stability enhancement using covariance matrix adapted evolution strategy

This paper presents the application of Covariance matrix adapted evolution strategy (CMAES) to reactive power planning (RPP) problem by minimizing the combined total cost of energy loss and the allocation cost of additional reactive power sources. Voltage stability index (L-index) is considered as an additional constraint in order to include the system stability into account. To improve the search efficiency of CMAES, penalty parameter-less scheme is employed for constraint handling. To determine the performance of the CMAES method on reactive power planning problem, IEEE-30 bus test system and Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB)-69 bus system (a practical system in India) are taken. For comparison purposes, the results of real-coded GA (RGA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), sequential quadratic programming (SQP), and Broyden–Fletcher–Goldfarb–Shanno (BFGS) methods are considered. The simulation results reveal that the CMAES algorithm performs better in terms of energy cost, investment cost, and consistency in getting optimal solution. Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) conditions are also applied on the best solution obtained using CMAES algorithm to substantiate a claim on optimality. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  K. Lee,et al.  A United Approach to Optimal Real and Reactive Power Dispatch , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[2]  Kwang Y. Lee,et al.  Optimal reactive power planning using evolutionary algorithms: a comparative study for evolutionary programming, evolutionary strategy, genetic algorithm, and linear programming , 1998 .

[3]  N. Hadjsaid,et al.  Emergency load shedding to avoid risks of voltage instability using indicators , 1994 .

[4]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Optimum Network Var Planning by Nonlinear Programming , 1973 .

[5]  Maurice K.W Mangoli,et al.  Optimal Long-term Reactive Power Planning Using Decomposition Techniques , 1993 .

[6]  Loi Lei Lai,et al.  Application of evolutionary programming to reactive power planning-comparison with nonlinear programming approach , 1997 .

[7]  Yutian Liu,et al.  Multi-objective reactive power and voltage control based on fuzzy optimization strategy and fuzzy adaptive particle swarm , 2008 .

[8]  M. Saravanan,et al.  Application of particle swarm optimization technique for optimal location of FACTS devices considering cost of installation and system loadability , 2007 .

[9]  K. Deb An Efficient Constraint Handling Method for Genetic Algorithms , 2000 .

[10]  Naoto Yorino,et al.  Multi-load level reactive power planning considering slow and fast VAR devices by means of particle swarm optimisation , 2008 .

[11]  L. Tolbert,et al.  Review of Reactive Power Planning: Objectives, Constraints, and Algorithms , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  Cw W. Yu,et al.  An investigation of reactive power planning based on chance constrained programming , 2007 .

[13]  Nikolaus Hansen,et al.  The CMA Evolution Strategy: A Comparing Review , 2006, Towards a New Evolutionary Computation.

[14]  Xin Yao,et al.  Evolutionary programming made faster , 1999, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[15]  Ivo F. Sbalzariniy,et al.  Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms , 2000 .

[16]  Ariovaldo V. Garcia,et al.  VAr planning using genetic algorithm and linear programming , 2001 .

[17]  Kenichi Aoki,et al.  Optimal VAr planning by approximation method for recursive mixed-integer linear programming , 1988 .

[18]  A. J. Urdaneta,et al.  A hybrid genetic algorithm for optimal reactive power planning based upon successive linear programming , 1999 .

[19]  Petros Koumoutsakos,et al.  Learning probability distributions in continuous evolutionary algorithms – a comparative review , 2004, Natural Computing.

[20]  H. Glavitsch,et al.  Estimating the Voltage Stability of a Power System , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.