Combined acoustical and visual performance of noise barriers in mitigating the environmental impact of motorways.

This study investigated the overall performance of noise barriers in mitigating environmental impact of motorways, taking into consideration their effects on reducing noise and visual intrusions of moving traffic, but also potentially inducing visual impact themselves. A laboratory experiment was carried out, using computer-visualised video scenes and motorway traffic noise recordings to present experimental scenarios covering two traffic levels, two distances of receiver to road, two types of background landscape, and five barrier conditions including motorway only, motorway with tree belt, motorways with 3 m timber barrier, 5m timber barrier, and 5m transparent barrier. Responses from 30 participants of university students were gathered and perceived barrier performance analysed. The results show that noise barriers were always beneficial in mitigating environmental impact of motorways, or made no significant changes in environmental quality when the impact of motorways was low. Overall, barriers only offered similar mitigation effect as compared to tree belt, but showed some potential to be more advantageous when traffic level went high. 5m timber barrier tended to perform better than the 3m one at the distance of 300 m but not at 100 m possibly due to its negative visual effect when getting closer. The transparent barrier did not perform much differently from the timber barriers but tended to be the least effective in most scenarios. Some low positive correlations were found between aesthetic preference for barriers and environmental impact reduction by the barriers.

[1]  Jian Kang,et al.  Effects of landscape on soundscape perception: Soundwalks in city parks , 2014 .

[2]  M. M. Osman,et al.  Highway noise barrier perceived benefit , 1980 .

[3]  Greg Watts,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF VEGETATION ON THE PERCEPTION OF TRAFFIC NOISE , 1999 .

[4]  L. M. Anderson,et al.  EFFECTS OF VEGETATION ON HUMAN RESPONSE TO SOUND , 2006 .

[5]  P A Morgan Technical annex to PPR490 - the acoustic durability of timber noise barriers on England's strategic road network , 2010 .

[6]  F L Hall ATTITUDES TOWARD NOISE BARRIERS BEFORE AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION , 1980 .

[7]  P M Nelson,et al.  CONVERTING THE UK TRAFFIC NOISE INDEX L(SUBA10,18H) TO EU NOISE INDICES FOR NOISE MAPPING , 2002 .

[8]  Thomas C. Brown,et al.  Is motion more important than it sounds?: The medium of presentation in environment perception research , 1993 .

[9]  L. Marks,et al.  Perception of noise transmitted through barriers. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  L. M. Anderson,et al.  Enhancement and Masking of Loudness by Environmental Factors , 1987 .

[11]  Jian Kang,et al.  The influence of preconceptions on perceived sound reduction by environmental noise barriers. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[12]  P M Nelson,et al.  Converting the UK traffic noise index LA 10 , 18 h to EU noise indices for noise mapping by , 2002 .

[13]  L Huddart AN EVALUATION OF THE VISUAL IMPACT OF RURAL ROADS AND TRAFFIC , 1978 .

[14]  Jian Kang,et al.  Prediction of the visual impact of motorways using GIS , 2015 .

[15]  Jian Kang,et al.  Effects of the visual landscape factors of an ecological waterscape on acoustic comfort , 2015 .

[16]  Michael A Perfater Community perception of noise barriers , 1979 .

[17]  L. M. Anderson,et al.  Effects of Sounds on Preferences for Outdoor Settings , 1983 .

[18]  Jennifer L. R Joynt,et al.  A sustainable approach to environmental noise barrier design. , 2005 .

[19]  Joo Young Hong,et al.  A soundwalk study on the relationship between soundscape and overall quality of urban outdoor places , 2012 .

[20]  David Watson Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (Second Edition) , 2003 .

[21]  J. Jeon,et al.  The effects of audio-visual factors on perceptions of environmental noise barrier performance , 2014 .

[22]  Michael A Perfater Community perception of noise barriers : volume II , 1980 .

[23]  Hans Bendtsen VISUAL PRINCIPLES FOR THE DESIGN OF NOISE BARRIERS , 1989 .

[24]  Great Britain. Foreign Office. Calculation of road traffic noise , 1988 .

[25]  Jin Yong Jeon,et al.  Designing sound and visual components for enhancement of urban soundscapes. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  José Luis Carles,et al.  Sound influence on landscape values , 1999 .

[27]  H. Fastl Audio-visual interactions in loudness evaluation , 2004 .

[28]  Kirill V. Horoshenkov,et al.  The acoustic and visual factors influencing the construction of tranquil space in urban and rural environments tranquil spaces-quiet places? , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Jacob A. Benfield,et al.  Aesthetic and affective effects of vocal and traffic noise on natural landscape assessment , 2010 .

[30]  Benz Kotzen,et al.  Environmental Noise Barriers: A Guide to their Acoustic and Visual Design , 1999 .

[31]  Zyun-iti Maekawa,et al.  Noise reduction by screens , 1968 .

[32]  Massimiliano Masullo,et al.  The influence of visual characteristics of barriers on railway noise perception. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[33]  A Moerkerken,et al.  CALCULATION OF ROAD-TRAFFIC NOISE , 1981 .

[34]  Lloyd A. Herman,et al.  Perception of Traffic Noise Barrier Effectiveness: Public Opinion Survey of Residents Living near I-71 , 1997 .

[35]  C. Lavandier,et al.  Influence of visual setting on sound ratings in an urban environment , 2002 .

[36]  J. P. Arenas,et al.  Potential problems with environmental sound barriers when used in mitigating surface transportation noise. , 2008, The Science of the total environment.