SIMULATED CLIMATE CHANGE ALTERED DOMINANCE HIERARCHIES AND DIVERSITY OF AN ALPINE BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOT

Alpine and arctic ecosystems may be particularly vulnerable to climate change. We know little about alpine plant community responses to the predicted abiotic changes, or to possible changes in the biotic environment caused by climate change. Four years of experimental warming and nutrient addition altered dominance hierarchies, community structure, and diversity of an alpine biodiversity hotspot in south Norway. The previously dominant dwarf shrub Dryas octopetala was replaced by graminoids and forbs under nutrient addition and warming with nutrients. Community diversity declined due to decreased bryophyte and lichen richness and abundances, and dwarf shrub abundances. In controls and in plots with only warming, where Dryas maintained dominance, the relationships between changes in Dryas cover and changes in community parameters were negative, suggesting that Dryas controls community processes. Under nutrient addition, bryophyte and lichen diversity decreased with decreasing Dryas cover, probably due to increased competition from graminoids and forbs. The shift in dominance hierarchies changed community structure and dynamics through increased biomass, vegetation height, and competition for light. Community diversity dropped primarily because changes in the abiotic environment modified biotic interactions, highlighting that species interaction must be considered in climate change experiments and in models predicting climate change effects.

[1]  R. Hollister,et al.  Biotic validation of small open‐top chambers in a tundra ecosystem , 2000 .

[2]  William D. Bowman,et al.  Nutrient availability, plant abundance, and species diversity in two alpine tundra communities. , 1997 .

[3]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects , 1998 .

[4]  Robert D. Hollister,et al.  RESPONSES OF TUNDRA PLANTS TO EXPERIMENTAL WARMING:META‐ANALYSIS OF THE INTERNATIONAL TUNDRA EXPERIMENT , 1999 .

[5]  G. Shaver,et al.  Response of Arctic ecosystems to climate change: results of long-term field experiments in Sweden and Alaska , 1999 .

[6]  U. Molau,et al.  Responses of Dryas octopetala to ITEX environmental manipulations: a synthesis with circumpolar comparisons , 1997 .

[7]  K. Klanderud.  Climate change effects on species interactions in an alpine plant community , 2005 .

[8]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Mechanisms of Primary Succession Following Deglaciation at Glacier Bay, Alaska , 1994 .

[9]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Assembly Rules Demonstrated in a Saltmarsh Community , 1995 .

[10]  H. Mooney.  Biological Response to Climate Change: An Agenda for Research. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[11]  C. Dormann,et al.  Neighbour identity modifies effects of elevated temperature on plant performance in the High Arctic , 2004 .

[12]  G. Henry,et al.  Open‐top designs for manipulating field temperature in high‐latitude ecosystems , 1997 .

[13]  Ø. Totland,et al.  Habitat dependent nurse effects of the dwarf-shrub Dryas octopetala on alpine and arctic plant community structure1 , 2004 .

[14]  J. Ludwig,et al.  Statistical ecology: a primer on methods & computing , 1988 .

[15]  B. Freedman,et al.  Effects of fertilization on three tundra plant communities of a polar desert oasis , 1986 .

[16]  T. Callaghan,et al.  Implications for Changes in Arctic Plant Biodiversity from Environmental Manipulation Experiments , 1995 .

[17]  G. Shaver.  Plant functional types and ecosystem change in arctic tundras , 1997 .

[18]  T. Callaghan,et al.  Environmental constraints on the growth, photosynthesis and reproductive development of Dryas octopetala at a high Arctic polar semi-desert, Svalbard , 1995, Oecologia.

[19]  T. Callaghan,et al.  COMPARATIVE RESPONSES OF PHENOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE DEVELOPMENT TO SIMULATED ENVIRONMENTAL-CHANGE IN SUB-ARCTIC AND HIGH ARCTIC PLANTS , 1993 .

[20]  T. Callaghan,et al.  Responses of a subarctic dwarf shrub heath community to simulated environmental change , 1998 .

[21]  J. McGraw.  EXPERIMENTAL ECOLOGY OF DRYAS OCTOPETALA ECOTYPES. III. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS AND PLANT GROWTH , 1985 .

[22]  T. Callaghan,et al.  PLANT COMMUNITY RESPONSES TO SIMULATED ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE AT A HIGH ARCTIC POLAR SEMI-DESERT , 1998 .

[23]  P. D. Körner.  Alpine Plant Life , 1999, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[24]  G. Swartzman,et al.  Statistical Ecology, a Primer on Methods and Computing@@@Ecology Simulation Primer , 1990 .

[25]  C. Dormann,et al.  Climate change in the Arctic: using plant functional types in a meta‐analysis of field experiments , 2002 .

[26]  J. Blair,et al.  Plant community responses to resource availability and heterogeneity during restoration , 2004, Oecologia.

[27]  U. Molau,et al.  Responses of subarctic-alpine plant communities to simulated environmental change : Biodiversity of bryophytes, lichens, and vascular plants , 1998 .

[28]  J. Lawton,et al.  Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming , 1998, Nature.

[29]  E. Haukioja,et al.  Growth response of subarctic dwarf shrubs, Empetrum nigrum and Vaccinium vitis-idaea, to manipulated environmental conditions and species removal , 1997 .

[30]  John Harte,et al.  Experimental warming causes large and rapid species loss, dampened by simulated grazing, on the Tibetan Plateau , 2004 .

[31]  J. Fox,et al.  Responses of Diversity and Growth-form Dominance to Fertility in Alaskan Tundra Fellfield Communities , 1992 .

[32]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Responses of Arctic Tundra to Experimental and Observed Changes in Climate , 1995 .