Neuraminidase inhibitors for treatment and prophylaxis of influenza in children: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Objective To assess the effects of the neuraminidase inhibitors oseltamivir and zanamivir in treatment of children with seasonal influenza and prevention of transmission to children in households. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of data from published and unpublished randomised controlled trials. Data sources Medline and Embase to June 2009, trial registries, and manufacturers and authors of relevant studies. Review methods Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials of neuraminidase inhibitors in children aged ≤12 in the community (that is, not admitted to hospital) with confirmed or clinically suspected influenza. Primary outcome measures were time to resolution of illness and incidence of influenza in children living in households with index cases of influenza. Results We identified four randomised trials of treatment of influenza (two with oseltamivir, two with zanamivir) involving 1766 children (1243 with confirmed influenza, of whom 55-69% had influenza A), and three randomised trials for postexposure prophylaxis (one with oseltamivir, two with zanamivir) involving 863 children; none of these trials tested efficacy with the current pandemic strain. Treatment trials showed reductions in median time to resolution of symptoms or return to normal activities, or both, of 0.5-1.5 days, which were significant in only two trials. A 10 day course of postexposure prophylaxis with zanamivir or oseltamivir resulted in an 8% (95% confidence interval 5% to 12%) decrease in the incidence of symptomatic influenza. Based on only one trial, oseltamivir did not reduce asthma exacerbations or improve peak flow in children with asthma. Treatment was not associated with reduction in overall use of antibiotics (risk difference −0.30, −0.13 to 0.01). Zanamivir was well tolerated, but oseltamivir was associated with an increased risk of vomiting (0.05, 0.02 to 0.09, number needed to harm=20). Conclusions Neuraminidase inhibitors provide a small benefit by shortening the duration of illness in children with seasonal influenza and reducing household transmission. They have little effect on asthma exacerbations or the use of antibiotics. Their effects on the incidence of serious complications, and on the current A/H1N1 influenza strain remain to be determined.

[1]  A. Sheikh,et al.  Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in children. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[2]  A. Sheikh,et al.  Cochrane review: Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in children , 2008 .

[3]  Y. Kikuchi,et al.  Oseltamivir phosphate in infants under 1 year of age with influenza infection , 2005, Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society.

[4]  R. Schwartz,et al.  Evaluation of diagnostic tests for influenza in a pediatric practice , 2002, The Pediatric infectious disease journal.

[5]  R Mann,et al.  Methods to identify postnatal depression in primary care: an integrated evidence synthesis and value of information analysis. , 2009, Health technology assessment.

[6]  F. Hayden,et al.  The efficacy of live attenuated, cold-adapted, trivalent, intranasal influenzavirus vaccine in children. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  C. Bridges,et al.  The underrecognized burden of influenza in young children. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  V Demicheli,et al.  Antivirals for influenza in healthy adults: systematic review , 2006, The Lancet.

[10]  F. Hayden Influenza virus neuraminidase inhibitors: clinical aspects , 2001 .

[11]  T. Jefferson,et al.  Amantadine and rimantadine for influenza A in adults. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[12]  O. Keene,et al.  Diagnosis of influenza in the community: relationship of clinical diagnosis to confirmed virological, serologic, or molecular detection of influenza. , 2001, Archives of internal medicine.

[13]  P. Tappenden,et al.  Amantadine, oseltamivir and zanamivir for the prophylaxis of influenza (including a review of existing guidance no. 67): a systematic review and economic evaluation. , 2009, Health technology assessment.

[14]  T. Fukui,et al.  Experience with oseltamivir for infants younger than 1 year old in Japan. , 2005, The Pediatric infectious disease journal.

[15]  K. Edwards,et al.  Burden of interpandemic influenza in children younger than 5 years: a 25-year prospective study. , 2002, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[16]  D. Altman,et al.  Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies , 2008 .

[17]  R. Couch,et al.  Interpandemic influenza in the Houston area, 1974-76. , 1978, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  H. Davies,et al.  Canadian Acute Respiratory Illness and Flu Scale (CARIFS): development of a valid measure for childhood respiratory infections. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[19]  R. Perera,et al.  Respiratory infections for which general practitioners consider prescribing an antibiotic: a prospective study , 2007, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[20]  Keiji Fukuda,et al.  Influenza-associated deaths among children in the United States, 2003-2004. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.