Self-Report Arousal and Divided Attention: A Study of Performance Operating Characteristics

Effects of arousal on single- and dual-task performance may be mediated by individual differences in both the availability and the allocation of attentional resources. The relation between arousal and resource usage was tested by con- structing performance operating characteristics (POCs) for concurrent per- formance of two category-search tasks for subjects high and low in self-report arousal. Results show an effect of arousal on the POC that is consistent with the hypothesis that high arousal increases the proportion of resources allo- cated to higher priority-task components. This mechanism explains effects of arousal on attentional selectivity. A more fine-grained analysis, taking into account interindividual variation in use of a self-terminating search strategy, suggested that higher arousal subjects also have more available resources. It is concluded that the extra resources of higher arousal subjects may only be de- ployed if there is a task component that is perceived to be of high priority.

[1]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Memory as a function of attention, level of processing, and automatization. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  W. Montague,et al.  Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms , 1969 .

[3]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[4]  Gerald Matthews,et al.  The effects of extraversion and arousal on intelligence test performance , 1985 .

[5]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .

[6]  M. Humphreys,et al.  Personality, motivation, and performance: a theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing. , 1984, Psychological review.

[7]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Refining the measurement of mood: The UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist , 1990 .

[8]  M. Eysenck,et al.  Attention and Arousal , 1982 .

[9]  M. Eysenck.  Attention And Arousal, Cognition And Performance , 1982 .

[10]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Interactive effects of extraversion and arousal on attentional task performance: Multiple resources or encoding processes? , 1989 .

[11]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  On the Economy of the Human Processing System: A Model of Multiple Capacity. , 1977 .

[12]  G. Matthews,et al.  Arousal, extraversion, and individual differences in resource availability , 1990 .

[13]  W. Schneider,et al.  Automatic category search and its transfer. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[15]  A. Sanders.  Towards a model of stress and human performance. , 1983, Acta psychologica.

[16]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  R. Thayer.  Toward a psychological theory of multidimensional activation (arousal) , 1978 .

[18]  J. Easterbrook.  The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. , 1959, Psychological review.

[19]  H. Frowein,et al.  Selective effects of barbiturate and amphetamine on information processing and response execution. , 1981, Acta psychologica.

[20]  G. Matthews.  Morningness–eveningness as a dimension of personality: Trait, state, and psychophysiological correlates , 1988 .

[21]  W. Hirst,et al.  Characterizing attentional resources. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  R. Thayer.  The biopsychology of mood and arousal , 1989 .

[23]  Michael E. Dawson,et al.  Electrodermal lability and rapid vigilance decrement in a degraded stimulus continuous performance task. , 1987 .

[24]  J. F. Mackworth.  THE EFFECT OF AMPHETAMINE ON THE DETECTABILITY OF SIGNALS IN A VIGILANCE TASK. , 1965, Canadian journal of psychology.

[25]  R. E. Walley,et al.  Lateral inhibition and cognitive masking: a neuropsychological theory of attention. , 1973, Psychological review.

[26]  Barry H. Kantowitz,et al.  On Scaling Performance Operating Characteristics: Caveat Emptor , 1985 .

[27]  G. C. Quarton,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF DRUGS AND FAMILIARITY ON PERFORMANCE IN CONTINUOUS VISUAL SEARCH , 1966, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[28]  G. Matthews.  Personality and multidimensional arousal: A study of two dimensions of extraversion , 1987 .