Patient-Reported Functional Outcomes After Hypofractionated or Conventionally Fractionated Radiation for Prostate Cancer: A National Cohort Study in England.

PURPOSE The aim of the current study was to determine patient-reported functional outcomes in men with prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing moderately hypofractionated (H-RT) or conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (C-RT) in a national cohort study. PATIENDS AND METHODS All men diagnosed with PCa between April 2014 and September 2016 in the English National Health Service undergoing C-RT or H-RT were identified in the National Prostate Cancer Audit and mailed a questionnaire at least 18 months after diagnosis. We estimated differences in patient-reported urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal function-Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite short-form 26 domain scores on a 0 to 100 scale-and health-related quality of life-EQ-5D-5L on a 0 to 1 scale-using linear regression with adjustment for patient, tumor, and treatment-related factors in addition to GI and genitourinary baseline function, with higher scores representing better outcomes. RESULTS Of the 17,058 men in the cohort, 77% responded: 8,432 men received C-RT (64.2%) and 4,699 H-RT (35.8%). Men in the H-RT group were older (age ≥ 70 years: 67.5% v 60.9%), fewer men had locally advanced disease (56.5% v 71.3%), were less likely to receive androgen-deprivation therapy (79.5% v 87.8%), and slightly more men had pretreatment genitourinary procedures (24.2% v 21.2%). H-RT was associated with small increases in adjusted mean Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite short-form 26 sexual (3.3 points; 95% CI, 2.1 to 4.5; P < .001) and hormonal function scores (3.2 points; 95% CI, 1.8 to 4.6; P < .001). These differences failed to meet established thresholds for a clinically meaningful change. There were no statistically significant differences in urinary or bowel function and quality of life. CONCLUSION This is the first national cohort study comparing functional outcomes after H-RT and C-RT reported by patients. These real-world results further support the use of H-RT as the standard for radiation therapy in men with nonmetastatic PCa.

[1]  L. Beckman,et al.  Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the HYPO-RT-PC randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial , 2019, The Lancet.

[2]  M. Donia,et al.  Real-world evidence to guide healthcare policies in oncology , 2019, Oncotarget.

[3]  D. Low,et al.  Quality of Life in Patients With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Hypofractionated vs Conventional Radiotherapy: A Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial , 2019, JAMA oncology.

[4]  L. Collette,et al.  Towards an evidence-informed value scale for surgical and radiation oncology: a multi-stakeholder perspective. , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[5]  K. Hoffman,et al.  Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: An ASTRO, ASCO, and AUA Evidence-Based Guideline. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  J. Bekelman A Younger Man With Localized Prostate Cancer Asks, "Which Type of Radiation Is Right for Me?" , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  N. Clarke,et al.  Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy: functional outcomes 18 months after diagnosis from a national cohort study in England , 2018, British Journal of Cancer.

[8]  D. Kuban,et al.  Patient-reported Urinary, Bowel, and Sexual Function After Hypofractionated Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results From a Randomized Trial , 2016, American journal of clinical oncology.

[9]  A. D'Amico,et al.  Conventional Versus Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Noninferiority Trials. , 2017, European urology focus.

[10]  N. Datta,et al.  Conventional Versus Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Localized or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis along with Therapeutic Implications. , 2017, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  National Population-Based Study Comparing Treatment-Related Toxicity in Men Who Received Intensity Modulated Versus 3-Dimensional Conformal Radical Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer. , 2017, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  C. Catton,et al.  Randomized Trial of a Hypofractionated Radiation Regimen for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  E. Horwitz,et al.  Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes From a Phase 3 Randomized Prospective Trial of Conventional Versus Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  D. Low,et al.  Randomized Phase III Noninferiority Study Comparing Two Radiotherapy Fractionation Schedules in Patients With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  B. Heijmen,et al.  Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer (HYPRO): final efficacy results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[16]  Annie Gao,et al.  Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[17]  B. Heijmen,et al.  Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with prostate cancer (HYPRO): late toxicity results from a randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[18]  Annie Gao,et al.  Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate-risk localised prostate cancer: 2-year patient-reported outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[19]  G. Velikova,et al.  Systematic Review of Radiation Therapy Toxicity Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials of Rectal Cancer: A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Clinician Toxicity Reporting. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  John T. Wei,et al.  Minimally important difference for the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Short Form. , 2015, Urology.

[21]  G. Storme,et al.  A randomized hypofractionation dose escalation trial for high risk prostate cancer patients: interim analysis of acute toxicity and quality of life in 124 patients , 2013, Radiation Oncology.

[22]  Communities,et al.  English Indices of Deprivation , 2013 .

[23]  G. Sonn,et al.  Differing perceptions of quality of life in patients with prostate cancer and their doctors. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[24]  D. Neal,et al.  The association of diagnosis in the private or NHS sector on prostate cancer stage and treatment. , 2012, Journal of public health.

[25]  G. Bonsel,et al.  Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) , 2011, Quality of Life Research.

[26]  Patrick Royston,et al.  Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice , 2011, Statistics in medicine.

[27]  Martin G Sanda,et al.  Development and validation of an abbreviated version of the expanded prostate cancer index composite instrument for measuring health-related quality of life among prostate cancer survivors. , 2010, Urology.

[28]  J. van der Meulen,et al.  Identifying co‐morbidity in surgical patients using administrative data with the Royal College of Surgeons Charlson Score , 2010, The British journal of surgery.

[29]  D. Petereit,et al.  Hypofractionation for Prostate Cancer , 2009, Cancer journal.

[30]  Patrick A. Kupelian,et al.  Hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (70 Gy at 2.5 Gy per fraction) for localized prostate cancer: Cleveland Clinic experience. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  R. Gutierrez Parametric Frailty and Shared Frailty Survival Models , 2002 .

[32]  D. Lubeck,et al.  Differences in urologist and patient assessments of health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer: results of the CaPSURE database. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[33]  R. E. Steiner,et al.  The royal college of radiologists. , 1975, Radiography.