Benefits of Using Smartphones and Other Digital Methods in Achieving Better Cardiac Rehabilitation Goals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background The importance of introducing digital technology as an alternative to classical cardiac rehabilitation has been discussed in several reviews. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyze the effectiveness of digital technology use in cardiac rehabilitation to determine whether digital methods like use of smartphones, compared to traditional rehabilitation methods, can improve the overall quality of life and exercise capacity of cardiac patients. Material/Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and ScienceDirect were systematically searched in a randomized manner, resulting in 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met all the inclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria were patients with coronary heart disease, valvular surgery, or post- myocardial revascularization that were in a technology-assisted cardiac rehabilitation program vs traditional standard physical follow-up protocol. Results Seven eligible trials including a total of 802 participants examined the effect of interventions on VO2 peak. One of the studies comprised 2-stage analysis for this parameter. We found that VO2 peak was significantly higher in the intervention group. Three studies analyzed the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) results; significant differences were reported, with better results in the interventional group. Conclusions The results of our meta-analysis support conducting further randomized trials, considering that the development of technology is on the rise. In the past decade there has been an immense increase in the use of smartphones, which can widely be used in healthcare, with promising benefits in having efficient home-based monitoring of the patients and in reducing financial burden.

[1]  W. Cubała,et al.  Commentary concerning treatment of depression in patients with heart failure according to 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. , 2022, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[2]  M. Borges,et al.  Digital home-based multidisciplinary cardiac rehabilitation: the way to counteract physical inactivity during the COVID-19 pandemic? , 2021, European Journal of Preventive Cardiology.

[3]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  A Socially Assistive Robot for Long-Term Cardiac Rehabilitation in the Real World , 2021, Frontiers in Neurorobotics.

[4]  F. Marvel,et al.  Digital Health Interventions for Cardiac Rehabilitation: Systematic Literature Review , 2020, Journal of medical Internet research.

[5]  Steffen E. Petersen,et al.  2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. , 2016, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[6]  S. Marzolini,et al.  Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cardiac Rehabilitation Delivery around the World , 2020, medRxiv.

[7]  R. Davey,et al.  A Behavioral Change Smartphone App and Program (ToDo-CR) to Decrease Sedentary Behavior in Cardiac Rehabilitation Participants: Prospective Feasibility Cohort Study , 2019, JMIR formative research.

[8]  D. Wood,et al.  Cardiac Rehabilitation During the COVID-19 Era: Guidance on Implementing Virtual Care , 2020, Canadian Journal of Cardiology.

[9]  H. Kemps,et al.  Cardiac telerehabilitation as an alternative to centre-based cardiac rehabilitation , 2020, Netherlands Heart Journal.

[10]  Dominique Hansen,et al.  Secondary prevention through comprehensive cardiovascular rehabilitation: From knowledge to implementation. 2020 update. A position paper from the Secondary Prevention and Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology. , 2020, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[11]  J. Špinar,et al.  Benefits and effectiveness of using a wrist heart rate monitor as a telerehabilitation device in cardiac patients , 2020, Medicine.

[12]  A. Bergland,et al.  Long-term follow-up with a smartphone application improves exercise capacity post cardiac rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial , 2020, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[13]  J. Higgins,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[14]  L. Tao,et al.  Effect of Smartphone-Based Telemonitored Exercise Rehabilitation among Patients with Coronary Heart Disease , 2019, Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research.

[15]  Junbo Ge,et al.  Smartphone and social media-based cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention in China (SMART-CR/SP): a parallel-group, single-blind, randomised controlled trial. , 2019, The Lancet. Digital health.

[16]  Gretchen A. Stevens,et al.  World Health Organization cardiovascular disease risk charts: revised models to estimate risk in 21 global regions , 2019, The Lancet. Global health.

[17]  R. Cano-de-la-Cuerda,et al.  Virtual reality and video games in cardiac rehabilitation programs. A systematic review , 2019, Disability and rehabilitation.

[18]  Jilin Li,et al.  Innovative Application of a Home-Based and Remote Sensing Cardiac Rehabilitation Protocol in Chinese Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. , 2019, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[19]  Rod S. Taylor,et al.  Interventions to Promote Patient Utilization of Cardiac Rehabilitation: Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2019, Journal of clinical medicine.

[20]  Sally J. Singh,et al.  The effects and costs of home-based rehabilitation for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: The REACH-HF multicentre randomized controlled trial , 2018, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[21]  May Azzawi,et al.  Home-Based Rehabilitation With Telemonitoring Guidance for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease (Short-Term Results of the TRiCH Study): Randomized Controlled Trial , 2018, Journal of medical Internet research.

[22]  Tony Belpaeme,et al.  Human-robot sensor interface for cardiac rehabilitation , 2017, 2017 International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[23]  Sumeet Gandhi,et al.  Effect of Mobile Health Interventions on the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2016, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[24]  Wei Liu,et al.  Telehealth interventions versus center-based cardiac rehabilitation of coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[25]  P. Vandervoort,et al.  Medium-Term Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Internet-Based and Patient-Specific Telerehabilitation Program With Text Messaging Support for Cardiac Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[26]  Rosy Tirimacco,et al.  Alternative models of cardiac rehabilitation: A systematic review , 2015, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[27]  E. R. Winkelmann,et al.  Analysis of steps adapted protocol in cardiac rehabilitation in the hospital phase , 2015, Revista brasileira de cirurgia cardiovascular : orgao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular.

[28]  Niels Peek,et al.  Effects of home-based training with telemonitoring guidance in low to moderate risk patients entering cardiac rehabilitation: short-term results of the FIT@Home study , 2014, European journal of preventive cardiology.

[29]  Marlien Varnfield,et al.  Smartphone-based home care model improved use of cardiac rehabilitation in postmyocardial infarction patients: results from a randomised controlled trial , 2014, Heart.

[30]  S. Golzari,et al.  The effect of home-based cardiac rehabilitation program on self efficacy of patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation center , 2013, BMC Research Notes.

[31]  R. Ware,et al.  Effect of a Telephone-Delivered Coronary Heart Disease Secondary Prevention Program (ProActive Heart) on Quality of Life and Health Behaviours: Primary Outcomes of a Randomised Controlled Trial , 2013, International Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[32]  C. Costantini,et al.  Phase I of cardiac rehabilitation: A new challenge for evidence based physiotherapy. , 2011, World journal of cardiology.

[33]  J. Casillas,et al.  DETERMINING THE MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT 1 DIFFERENCE FOR THE SIX-MINUTE WALK TEST AND THE 2002 METER FAST WALK TEST DURING CARDIAC REHABILITATION 3 PROGRAM IN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE PATIENTS AFTER 4 ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME , 2017 .

[34]  Michele Tarsilla Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation.

[35]  Melody Hertzog,et al.  Influence of a symptom management telehealth intervention on older adults' early recovery outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery. , 2009, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[36]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practice , 2002, Journal of health services research & policy.

[37]  G. Smith,et al.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test , 1997, BMJ.

[38]  M. Wilhelm,et al.  Effectiveness of Home-Based Mobile Guided Cardiac Rehabilitation as Alternative Strategy for Nonparticipation in Clinic-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation Among Elderly Patients in Europe A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2022 .