Spanning the full range of neutron star properties within a microscopic description

The high-density behavior of nuclear matter is analyzed within a relativistic mean-field description with non-linear meson interactions. To assess the model parameters and their output, a Bayesian inference technique is used. The Bayesian setup is limited only by a few nuclear saturation properties, the neutron star maximum mass larger than 2 M$_\odot$, and the low-density pure neutron matter equation of state (EOS) produced by an accurate N$^3$LO calculation in chiral effective field theory. Depending on the strength of the non-linear scalar vector field contribution, we have found three distinct classes of EOSs, each one correlated to different star properties distributions. If the non-linear vector field contribution is absent, the gravitational maximum mass and the sound velocity at high densities are the greatest. However, it also gives the smallest speed of sound at densities below three times saturation density. On the other hand, models with the strongest non-linear vector field contribution predict the largest radii and tidal deformabilities for 1.4 M$_\odot$ stars, together with the smallest mass for the onset of the nucleonic direct Urca processes and the smallest central baryonic densities for the maximum mass configuration. These models have the largest speed of sound below three times saturation density, but the smallest at high densities, in particular, above four times saturation density the speed of sound decreases approaching approximately $\sqrt{0.4}c$ at the center of the maximum mass star. On the contrary, a weak non-linear vector contribution gives a monotonically increasing speed of sound. A 2.75 M$_\odot$ NS maximum mass was obtained in the tail of the posterior with a weak non-linear vector field interaction. We found that pQCD favors models with a large non-linear vector field contribution or hyperons.

[1]  A. Kurkela Thoughts about the utility of perturbative QCD in the cores of neutron stars – contribution to a roundtable discussion on neutron stars and QCD , 2022, EPJ Web of Conferences.

[2]  G. Pühlhofer,et al.  A strangely light neutron star within a supernova remnant , 2022, Nature Astronomy.

[3]  D. Chatterjee,et al.  Role of vector self-interaction in neutron star properties , 2022, Nuclear Physics A.

[4]  L. Rezzolla,et al.  On the Sound Speed in Neutron Stars , 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

[5]  C. Providência,et al.  Relativistic Description of Dense Matter Equation of State and Compatibility with Neutron Star Observables: A Bayesian Approach , 2022, 2201.12552.

[6]  I. Cognard,et al.  The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton Data , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

[7]  T. E. Riley,et al.  Constraints on the Dense Matter Equation of State and Neutron Star Properties from NICER’s Mass–Radius Estimate of PSR J0740+6620 and Multimessenger Observations , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

[8]  G. Burgio,et al.  Neutron stars and the nuclear equation of state , 2021, 2105.03747.

[9]  T. E. Riley,et al.  A NICER View of the Massive Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 Informed by Radio Timing and XMM-Newton Spectroscopy , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

[10]  B. W. Meyers,et al.  Refined Mass and Geometric Measurements of the High-mass PSR J0740+6620 , 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

[11]  J. Buchner Nested sampling methods , 2021, Statistics Surveys.

[12]  G. Pagliara,et al.  Bayesian Inference of Dense Matter Equation of State within Relativistic Mean Field Models Using Astrophysical Measurements , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[13]  Keith C. Gendreau,et al.  A NICER View of PSR J0030+0451: Millisecond Pulsar Parameter Estimation , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[14]  W. Ho,et al.  PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius from NICER Data and Implications for the Properties of Neutron Star Matter , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[15]  Y. N. Liu,et al.  Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger , 2019, Proceedings of Multifrequency Behaviour of High Energy Cosmic Sources - XIII — PoS(MULTIF2019).

[16]  R. Sarpong,et al.  Bio-inspired synthesis of xishacorenes A, B, and C, and a new congener from fuscol† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c9sc02572c , 2019, Chemical science.

[17]  K. Chatziioannou,et al.  Equation-of-state constraints and the QCD phase transition in the era of gravitational-wave astronomy , 2019, XIAMEN-CUSTIPEN WORKSHOP ON THE EQUATION OF STATE OF DENSE NEUTRON-RICH MATTER IN THE ERA OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVE ASTRONOMY.

[18]  D. Wei,et al.  GW170817: The Energy Extraction Process of the Off-axis Relativistic Outflow and the Constraint on the Equation of State of Neutron Stars , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[19]  P. Lasky,et al.  Bilby: A User-friendly Bayesian Inference Library for Gravitational-wave Astronomy , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[20]  D. Radice,et al.  Multimessenger parameter estimation of GW170817 , 2018, The European Physical Journal A.

[21]  J. Andersen,et al.  Compact Stars , 2018, Effective Field Theories for Nuclei and Compact-Star Matter.

[22]  S. Smartt,et al.  Constraints on the neutron star equation of state from AT2017gfo using radiative transfer simulations , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[23]  Nai-Bo Zhang,et al.  Combined Constraints on the Equation of State of Dense Neutron-rich Matter from Terrestrial Nuclear Experiments and Observations of Neutron Stars , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[24]  P. B. Covas,et al.  Gravitational Waves and Gamma-rays from a Binary Neutron Star Merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A , 2017, 1710.05834.

[25]  À. Ramos,et al.  The Equation of State for the Nucleonic and Hyperonic Core of Neutron Stars , 2017, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia.

[26]  F. Cipolletta,et al.  Physics and astrophysics of neutron stars , 2015 .

[27]  A. Merloni,et al.  X-ray spectral modelling of the AGN obscuring region in the CDFS: Bayesian model selection and catalogue , 2014, 1402.0004.

[28]  C. Providência,et al.  Imprint of the symmetry energy on the inner crust and strangeness content of neutron stars , 2013, 1307.1436.

[29]  D. Chatterjee,et al.  Hyperons and massive neutron stars: The role of hyperon potentials , 2011, 1111.6049.

[30]  R. Furnstahl,et al.  Bayesian parameter estimation in effective field theories , 2008, 1511.03618.

[31]  G. Colò,et al.  Deducing the nuclear-matter incompressibility coefficient from data on isoscalar compression modes , 2006 .

[32]  Kevin Barraclough,et al.  I and i , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[33]  J. Lattimer,et al.  Neutron Star Structure and the Equation of State , 2000, astro-ph/0002232.

[34]  Yuichi Sugahara,et al.  Relativistic mean-field theory for unstable nuclei with non-linear σ and ω terms , 1994 .

[35]  A. Bodmer,et al.  Relativistic Calculation of Nuclear Matter and the Nuclear Surface , 1977 .

[36]  J. Walecka A theory of highly condensed matter , 1974 .

[37]  P. K. Panda,et al.  GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 Solar Mass Black Hole with a 2.6 Solar Mass Compact Object , 2020 .

[38]  A. Vuorinen,et al.  Quark-matter cores in neutron stars , 2019 .

[39]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Bayesian data analysis, third edition , 2013 .

[40]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[41]  D. G. Yakovlev,et al.  Neutron Stars 1 : Equation of State and Structure , 2007 .