The emergence of middle voice structures with and without agents

Abstract This article presents evidence that, cross-linguistically or within the same language (family), there appears to be no morphosyntactic properties and/or structures specifically designated for the formation of middle voice constructions. What has been labeled a ‘middle voice construction’ is a semantic interpretation that, crucially, is blocked when an event variable is existentially closed by T. This article focuses on two ways of expressing a middle statement; namely (i) middle voice readings that occur with lexical-s passives, and (ii) adjectival middles – in Mainland Scandinavian, showing that properties such as the availability of an agent in middles pattern with whether an event variable is present (in the structure) or not. These are the result of two equally valid and productive grammatical structures: one where an event variable is present, an agent is projected and a modal operator blocks existential closure of the event variable, and another one where the event variable is not present in the structure, and therefore the operator is not necessary – hence impossible.

[1]  Wolfram Hinzen.  Syntax in the Atom , 2012 .

[2]  W. Hinzen.  Mind Design and Minimal Syntax , 2006 .

[3]  R. Larson.  On the double object construction , 1988 .

[4]  Erik Andersson,et al.  Svenska Akademiens grammatik , 1999 .

[5]  Björn Lundquist.  The Role of Tense-Copying and Syncretism in the Licensing of Morphological Passives in the Nordic Languages , 2016 .

[6]  T. Stroik.  Middles and movement , 1992 .

[7]  Morris Halle,et al.  Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection , 1993 .

[8]  Howard Lasnik,et al.  Complement Object Deletion 1974 , 1989 .

[9]  Noam Chomsky.  Essays on Form and Interpretation , 1977 .

[10]  Noam Chomsky.  Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures , 1993 .

[11]  Mthuli Ncube,et al.  The emerging middle class in Africa , 2015 .

[12]  Raffaella Folli,et al.  Causation, Obligation, and Argument Structure: On the Nature of Little v , 2007, Linguistic Inquiry.

[13]  David Adger,et al.  A minimalist theory of feature structure , 2008 .

[14]  Gereon Müller,et al.  Constraints on Displacement: A phase-based approach , 2011 .

[15]  J. Legate.  Subjects in Acehnese and the nature of the passive , 2012 .

[16]  M. Brody,et al.  Mirror Theory: Syntactic Representation in Perfect Syntax , 2000, Linguistic Inquiry.

[17]  Jonny Butler,et al.  A minimalist treatment of modality , 2003 .

[18]  Elisabet Engdahl,et al.  Semantic and syntactic patterns in Swedish passives , 2006 .

[19]  Amaya Mendikoetxea,et al.  Construcciones con "se": medias, pasivas e impersonales , 1999 .

[20]  David Embick,et al.  On the Structure of Resultative Participles in English , 2004, Linguistic Inquiry.

[21]  Esther Torrego,et al.  The Dependencies of Objects , 1998 .

[22]  Lenhart K. Schubert,et al.  Generically Speaking, or, Using Discourse Representation Theory to Interpret Generics , 1989 .

[23]  Michael T. Putnam,et al.  The Structural Design of Language , 2013 .

[24]  M. Starke.  Towards elegant parameters: Language variation reduces to the size of lexically‐stored trees , 2014 .

[25]  A. Kratzer.  Making a Pronoun: Fake Indexicals as Windows into the Properties of Pronouns , 2009, Linguistic Inquiry.

[26]  Alec Marantz,et al.  No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon , 1997 .

[27]  Ian Roberts,et al.  Middle Constructions in Dutch and English , 1993 .

[28]  K. A. Jayaseelan,et al.  Finiteness and Negation in Dravidian , 2008 .

[29]  Noam Chomsky.  Three Factors in Language Design , 2005, Linguistic Inquiry.

[30]  Ángel J. Gallego.  Object shift in Romance , 2013 .

[31]  Eva Klingvall.  Complex non-compound words in Swedish , 2012 .

[32]  Gunlög Josefsson.  How could Merge be free and word formation restricted: The case of compounding in Romance and Germanic , 2005 .

[33]  H. Harley.  Subjects, events, and licensing , 1995 .

[34]  Elisabet Engdahl,et al.  The choice between bli-passive and s-passive in Danish, Norwegian and Swedish , 2007 .

[35]  Richard S. Kayne.  Some Notes on Comparative Syntax, with Special Reference to English and French , 2008 .

[36]  Hagit Borer,et al.  In the Event of a Nominal , 2012 .

[37]  M. Halle.  Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and Fission , 2000 .

[38]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[39]  Susan Rothstein,et al.  FINE-GRAINED STRUCTURE IN THE EVENTUALITY DOMAIN: THE SEMANTICS OF PREDICATIVE ADJECTIVE PHRASES AND BE , 1999 .

[40]  Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul,et al.  Pronouns and Case , 2002 .

[41]  Marijana Marelj,et al.  Middles and Argument Structure across Languages , 2013 .

[42]  On middle formation: a reply to Zribi-Hertz , 1995 .

[43]  B. Partee,et al.  Mathematical Methods in Linguistics , 1990 .

[44]  Martina Wiltschko,et al.  Anchoring Events to Utterances without Tense , 2005 .

[45]  Mürvet Enç.  Anchoring conditions for tense , 1987 .

[46]  Noam Chomsky.  A minimalist program for linguistic theory , 1992 .

[47]  Tim Stowell,et al.  Origins of phrase structure , 1981 .

[48]  Virginia Mary Brennan,et al.  Root and epistemic modal auxiliary verbs , 1993 .

[49]  T. R. Rapoport,et al.  The English Middle and Agentivity , 1999, Linguistic Inquiry.

[50]  Florian Schäfer,et al.  The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically , 2006 .

[51]  Claudia Maienborn,et al.  On the limits of the Davidsonian approach: The case of copula sentences. , 2005 .

[52]  Robert Rolf Noyer.  Features, positions and affixes in autonomous morphological structure , 1992 .

[53]  Höskuldur Thráinsson,et al.  The Syntax of Icelandic , 2007 .

[54]  M. Picallo,et al.  Modal verbs in Catalan , 1990 .

[55]  G. Cinque.  Adverbs and functional heads , 1999 .

[56]  Michael T. Putnam,et al.  Parasitic semantics (or why Swedish can’t lexicalize middle voice constructions) , 2013 .

[57]  A. Kratzer.  Severing the External Argument from its Verb , 1996 .

[58]  Jason Merchant,et al.  Voice and Ellipsis , 2013, Linguistic Inquiry.

[59]  Angelika Kratzer,et al.  Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates , 1995 .