A hybrid approach to IT project selection

-Numerous enterprises anticipate that Information Technology (IT) may enhance their competitive advantage and profitability, and provide them with a competitive edge in meeting the challenges from global competition. However, there is a critical issue of how to invest in IT judiciously and improve the performance of organizations successfully. Although several methods have been proposed for selecting appropriate IT projects, their models use few criteria and lack sufficient information for evaluation. Indeed, to ensure the alignment of IT investment and strategic needs in the real world, it is necessary to consider a variety of financial and non-financial factors within the evaluation structure. In order to devise a more useful way to solve IT project selection problems, this paper combines the decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) with the analytic network process (ANP) and the zero-one goal programming (ZOGP) to propose an effective solution that considers both financial and non-financial factors. Additionally, an empirical study is presented to illustrate the application of the proposed solution. Key-words: Information Technology; Project Selection; DEMATEL; ANP; ZOGP

[1]  Subrata Chakraborty,et al.  A simulation based comparative study of normalization procedures in multiattribute decision making , 2007 .

[2]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  An investigation of critical management issues in ERP implementation: emperical evidence from Canadian organizations , 2003 .

[3]  Ruhul A. Sarker,et al.  Modelling a nationwide crop planning problem using a multiple criteria decision making tool , 2002 .

[4]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  A DECISION MODEL FOR INTERDEPENDENT INFORMATION SYSTEM PROJECT SELECTION , 1996 .

[5]  Felix T.S. Chan,et al.  Evaluation methodologies for technology selection , 2000 .

[6]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Planning models for research and development , 1990 .

[7]  Joeseph Sarkis,et al.  A methodological framework for evaluating environmentally conscious manufacturing programs , 1999 .

[8]  Ellis Horowitz,et al.  Software Cost Estimation with COCOMO II , 2000 .

[9]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making with incomplete linguistic preference relations , 2007 .

[10]  Marc J. Schniederjans,et al.  Goal Programming: Methodology and Applications , 2010 .

[11]  C. Romero Extended lexicographic goal programming: a unifying approach , 2001 .

[12]  Mitsuo Kamaike Design Elements in the Passenger Car Development : The Classification and the Influence Analysis in Case of Recreational Vehicle , 2001 .

[13]  M. Buss How to rank computer projects. , 1983, Harvard business review.

[14]  Mehrdad Tamiz,et al.  Goal programming for decision making: An overview of the current state-of-the-art , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  P. Harker,et al.  Globally effective questioning in the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[16]  Jenn Tang,et al.  Effect of The Project Control Management Through Networking Communication Perspective , 2007 .

[17]  Marc J. Schniederjans,et al.  A model formulation system for information system project selection , 1993, Comput. Oper. Res..

[18]  Marc J. Schniederjans,et al.  Using the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for information system project selection , 1991, Inf. Manag..

[19]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Jr. Henry C. Lucas,et al.  A Multiple-Criterion Scoring Approach To Information System Project Selection , 1976 .

[21]  A. Gabus,et al.  Perceptions of the world problematique: communication procedure, communicating with those bearing collective responsibility , 1973 .

[22]  Hua Jiang,et al.  Information technology support system of supply chain management , 2007 .

[23]  Masood A. Badri,et al.  A comprehensive 0-1 goal programming model for project selection , 2001 .

[24]  M. Schniederjans,et al.  Using the analytic hierarchy process and multi-objective programming for the selection of cost drivers in activity-based costing , 1997, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Kazuyuki Sekitani,et al.  A UNIFIED MODEL AND ANALYSIS FOR AHP AND ANP , 2001 .

[26]  T. L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with dependence and feedback , 2001 .

[27]  Vladislav Rajkovic,et al.  Knowledge-based portfolio analysis for project evaluation , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[28]  T. Saaty,et al.  Fundamentals of the analytic network process — Dependence and feedback in decision-making with a single network , 2004 .

[29]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  A multiple criteria decision model for information system project selection , 1995, Comput. Oper. Res..

[30]  Soung Hie Kim,et al.  Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[31]  Yujiro Shimizu,et al.  Designing methods of human interface for supervisory control systems , 1998 .

[32]  Masood A. Badri,et al.  A combined AHP}GP model for qualitycontrol sy stems , 2001 .