Cousins Virtual Jane and Virtual Joe, extraordinary virtual helpers

Higher education institutions deliver web-based learning with varied success. The success rate of distributed online courses remains low. Factors such as ineffective course facilitation and insufficient communication contribute to the unfulfilled promises of web-based learning. Students consequently feel unmotivated. Instructor control and in the courseroom further isolates students, whereas success rate increases when students unite in virtual communities. King (2002) increased student participation in his online classes by creating a virtual student, Joe, as a participating student and supplementary facilitator. This investigation responds to King's call for further directions on how a virtual helper enhances online facilitation. This inspired our investigation of how Virtual Jane might augment online facilitation. King's prediction, ''It seems that Joe Bags may have a family in the future,'' (p. 164) became a reality in a South African masters' web-based class on web-based learning.

[1]  Stanley R. Trollip,et al.  Between a rock and a hard place: Faculty participation in online Classrooms , 2005 .

[2]  R. Woods.  How Much Communication Is Enough in Online Courses? Exploring the Relationship between Frequency of Instructor-Initiated Personal Email and Learner's Perceptions of and Participation in Online Learning , 2002 .

[3]  Noriko Hara,et al.  Students’ Distress with a Web-based Distance Education Course: An Ethnographic Study of Participants' Experiences , 2003 .

[4]  Seugnet Blignaut,et al.  Methical Jane: Perspectives on an Undisclosed Virtual Student , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[5]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education , 2005, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[6]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Becoming a Virtual Professor: Pedagogical Roles and Asynchronous Learning Networks , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Tom Stafford.  A fire to be lighted: a case-study in enquiry based learning , 2008 .

[8]  Frederick B. King,et al.  A virtual student: Not an ordinary Joe , 2002, Internet High. Educ..

[9]  M. Prisbell.  Students' Perceptions of Instructors' Style of Communication and Satisfaction with Communication in the Classroom , 1994 .

[10]  N. B. Cottrell,et al.  Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audicence and the mere presence of others. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Simone Conceição-Runlee.  Faculty lived experiences in the online environment , 2001 .

[12]  Seugnet Blignaut,et al.  Developing a taxonomy of faculty participation in asynchronous learning environments - an exploratory investigation , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[13]  K. Hong.  Relationships between students' and instructional variables with satisfaction and learning from a Web-based course , 2002, Internet High. Educ..

[14]  Karen Swan,et al.  Course Design Factors Influencing the Success of Online Learning , 2000, WebNet.

[15]  Seugnet Blignaut,et al.  Becoming Jane: Designing a Virtual Online Student , 2008 .

[16]  Howard R. Budin.  Technology and the teacher's role , 1991 .

[17]  Lawrence A. Tomei.  The Impact of Online Teaching on Faculty Load: Computing the Ideal Class Size for Online Courses , 2006 .

[18]  Mark Stansfield,et al.  Facilitating Online Learning , 2004 .

[19]  Lora Aroyo,et al.  Intelligent Agents for Educational Computer-Aided Systems - Special Issue Preface , 1999 .

[20]  A. Seugnet Blignaut,et al.  Measuring Faculty Participation in Asynchronous Discussion Forums , 2003 .

[21]  Amy Banic,et al.  Social responses to virtual humans: implications for future interface design , 2007, CHI.

[22]  Lora Aroyo,et al.  Special Issue Preface - Intelligent Agents for Educational Computer-Aided Systems , 1999 .

[23]  Thomas C. Reeves.  Storms clouds on the digital education horizon , 2002, ASCILITE.

[24]  Herbert E. Muse.  The Web-based community college student: An examination of factors that lead to success and risk , 2003, Internet and Higher Education.

[25]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  Facilitating Computer Conferencing: Recommendations from the Field. , 1995 .

[26]  C. Fulford,et al.  Perceptions of Interaction: The critical predictor in distance education , 1993 .

[27]  R. Mayer,et al.  Personalized messages that promote science learning in virtual environments , 2004 .

[28]  Agneta Gulz,et al.  Benefits of Virtual Characters in Computer Based Learning Environments: Claims and Evidence , 2004, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[29]  Donnie Kirk,et al.  Facilitating Online Learning: Effective Strategies for Moderators , 2003, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[30]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Computer Mediated Communication in Distance Education , 1994 .

[31]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Constructivism and computer‐mediated communication in distance education , 1995 .

[32]  Margaret Mazzolini,et al.  Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[33]  Daniel V. Eastmond.  E-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online , 2003 .

[34]  鈴木 聡.  Media Equation 研究の背景と動向 , 2011 .

[35]  David DiBiase,et al.  Is distance teaching more work or less work? , 2000 .