Detection of Colorectal Hepatic Metastases Is Superior at Standard Radiation Dose CT versus Reduced Dose CT.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Ehsan Samei | Wei Wei | Corey T Jensen | Bharat Raval | Nicolaus A Wagner-Bartak | E. Samei | Wei Wei | Xinming Liu | Xinming Liu | B. Raval | Shiva Gupta | Shiva Gupta | Lan N Vu | David Martinez | Yuan Cheng | C. Jensen | N. Wagner-Bartak | D. Martínez | Yuan Cheng
[1] Wei Wei,et al. Third version of vendor-specific model-based iterativereconstruction (Veo 3.0): evaluation of CT image quality in the abdomen using new noise reduction presets and varied slice optimization. , 2017, The British journal of radiology.
[2] J. Solomon,et al. Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual-source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability. , 2015, Medical physics.
[3] Noise-reducing algorithms do not necessarily provide superior dose optimisation for hepatic lesion detection with multidetector CT. , 2013, The British journal of radiology.
[4] Kenneth Hess,et al. Recurrence and Outcomes Following Hepatic Resection, Radiofrequency Ablation, and Combined Resection/Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastases , 2004, Annals of surgery.
[5] E. Fosse,et al. Quantitative Measurements Versus Receiver Operating Characteristics and Visual Grading Regression in CT Images Reconstructed with Iterative Reconstruction: A Phantom Study. , 2017, Academic radiology.
[6] A. Einstein,et al. Impact of reduced patient life expectancy on potential cancer risks from radiologic imaging. , 2011, Radiology.
[7] Michael A. Choti,et al. Trends in Long-Term Survival Following Liver Resection for Hepatic Colorectal Metastases , 2002, Annals of surgery.
[8] Nancy A Obuchowski,et al. Effect of reduced radiation exposure and iterative reconstruction on detection of low-contrast low-attenuation lesions in an anthropomorphic liver phantom: an 18-reader study. , 2014, Radiology.
[9] Samuel L Brady,et al. Investigation of American Association of Physicists in Medicine Report 204 size-specific dose estimates for pediatric CT implementation. , 2012, Radiology.
[10] Sebastian Feuerlein,et al. New iterative reconstruction techniques for cardiovascular computed tomography: how do they work, and what are the advantages and disadvantages? , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.
[11] H Alkadhi,et al. Effect of automatic tube voltage selection on image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT angiography of various body sizes: a phantom study. , 2013, Clinical radiology.
[12] D. Volders,et al. Model-based iterative reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal CT: comparison of image quality in the detection of colorectal liver metastases. , 2013, Radiology.
[13] Patrik Rogalla,et al. Iterative reconstruction algorithm for CT: can radiation dose be decreased while low-contrast detectability is preserved? , 2013, Radiology.
[14] R. Morin,et al. U.S. Diagnostic Reference Levels and Achievable Doses for 10 Adult CT Examinations. , 2017, Radiology.
[15] L. Schwartz,et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.
[16] Armando Manduca,et al. Methods for clinical evaluation of noise reduction techniques in abdominopelvic CT. , 2014, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.
[17] E. Samei,et al. Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm--initial clinical experience. , 2010, Radiology.
[18] Ehsan Samei,et al. Effect of Radiation Dose Reduction and Reconstruction Algorithm on Image Noise, Contrast, Resolution, and Detectability of Subtle Hypoattenuating Liver Lesions at Multidetector CT: Filtered Back Projection versus a Commercial Model-based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm. , 2017, Radiology.
[19] Armando Manduca,et al. Observer Performance in the Detection and Classification of Malignant Hepatic Nodules and Masses with CT Image-Space Denoising and Iterative Reconstruction. , 2015, Radiology.
[20] Ke Li,et al. Prospective Evaluation of Reduced Dose Computed Tomography for the Detection of Low-Contrast Liver Lesions: Direct Comparison with Concurrent Standard Dose Imaging , 2017, European Radiology.
[21] Laurence Parker,et al. The recent downturn in utilization of CT: the start of a new trend? , 2012, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.
[22] P. Mittal,et al. Changing Abdominal Imaging Utilization Patterns: Perspectives From Medicare Beneficiaries Over Two Decades. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.
[23] Jiang Hsieh,et al. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. , 2010, Radiology.
[24] Heejin Kwon,et al. The Detection of Focal Liver Lesions Using Abdominal CT: A Comparison of Image Quality Between Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction V and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction. , 2016, Academic radiology.
[25] Heejin Kwon,et al. The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. , 2015, The British journal of radiology.
[26] Ehsan Samei,et al. Assessment of volumetric noise and resolution performance for linear and nonlinear CT reconstruction methods. , 2014, Medical physics.
[27] W J H Veldkamp,et al. Automated assessment of low contrast sensitivity for CT systems using a model observer. , 2011, Medical physics.
[28] Ehsan Samei,et al. Evaluating iterative reconstruction performance in computed tomography. , 2014, Medical physics.