iMonDB: Mass Spectrometry Quality Control through Instrument Monitoring.

Over the past few years, awareness has risen that for mass-spectrometry-based proteomics methods to mature into everyday analytical and clinical practices, extensive quality assessment is mandatory. A currently overlooked source of qualitative information originates from the mass spectrometer itself. Apart from the actual mass spectral data, raw-data objects also contain parameter settings and sensory information about the mass instrument. This information gives a detailed account of the operation of the instrument, which eventually can be related to observations in mass spectral data. The advantage of instrument information at the lowest level is the high sensitivity to detect emerging defects in a timely fashion. To this end, we introduce the Instrument MONitoring DataBase (iMonDB), which allows us to automatically extract, store, and manage the instrument parameters from raw-data objects into a highly efficient database structure. This enables us to monitor the instrument parameters over a considerable time period. Time course information about the instrument performance is necessary to define the normal range of operation and to detect anomalies that may correlate with instrument failure. The proposed tools foster an additional handle on quality control and are released as open source under the permissive Apache 2.0 license. The tools can be downloaded from https://bitbucket.org/proteinspector/imondb.

[1]  Natalie I. Tasman,et al.  A Cross-platform Toolkit for Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[2]  Lennart Martens,et al.  mzML—a Community Standard for Mass Spectrometry Data* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[3]  David L. Tabb,et al.  QC Metrics from CPTAC Raw LC-MS/MS Data Interpreted through Multivariate Statistics , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[4]  Lennart Martens,et al.  jqcML: an open-source java API for mass spectrometry quality control data in the qcML format. , 2014, Journal of proteome research.

[5]  Matthias Mann,et al.  SprayQc: a real-time LC-MS/MS quality monitoring system to maximize uptime using off the shelf components. , 2012, Journal of proteome research.

[6]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  SIMPATIQCO: A Server-Based Software Suite Which Facilitates Monitoring the Time Course of LC–MS Performance Metrics on Orbitrap Instruments , 2012, Journal of proteome research.

[7]  David L Tabb,et al.  Quality assessment for clinical proteomics. , 2013, Clinical biochemistry.

[8]  David L. Tabb,et al.  Performance Metrics for Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Systems in Proteomics Analyses* , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[9]  Michael S. Bereman,et al.  Implementation of Statistical Process Control for Proteomic Experiments Via LC MS/MS , 2014, Journal of The American Society for Mass Spectrometry.

[10]  Lennart Martens,et al.  Bringing proteomics into the clinic: The need for the field to finally take itself seriously , 2013, Proteomics. Clinical applications.

[11]  Lennart Martens,et al.  qcML: An Exchange Format for Quality Control Metrics from Mass Spectrometry Experiments , 2014, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[12]  Martin Eisenacher,et al.  The HUPO proteomics standards initiative- mass spectrometry controlled vocabulary , 2013, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.

[13]  John T. Prince,et al.  Metriculator: quality assessment for mass spectrometry-based proteomics , 2013, Bioinform..