Searches after Gravitational Waves Using ARizona Observatories (SAGUARO): Observations and Analysis from Advanced LIGO/Virgo's Third Observing Run
暂无分享,去创建一个
E. Christensen | A. Corsi | V. Paschalidis | A. Rest | R. Foley | S. Valenti | L. Chomiuk | W. Fong | J. Strader | M. Drout | D. Reichart | D. Sand | S. Yang | P. Garnavich | S. Wyatt | A. Gibbs | F. Shelly | C. Grier | K. Paterson | A. Zabludoff | C. Veillet | M. Lundquist | R. Wagner | E. Hamden | E. Olszewski | C. Bilinski | H. Krantz | J. Andrews | P. Gabor | B. Weiner | R. Amaro | J. Rastinejad | D. Trilling | N. Smith | O. Eskandari | P. Daly | H. Bradley | S. Zhou-Wright | Zhou-Wright S.
[1] N. Yasuda,et al. Optical follow-up observation for GW event S190510g using Subaru/Hyper Suprime-Cam , 2021, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan.
[2] P. Brown,et al. Swift Multiwavelength Follow-up of LVC S200224ca and the Implications for Binary Black Hole Mergers , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.
[3] M. Graham,et al. Optical follow-up of the neutron star–black hole mergers S200105ae and S200115j , 2020, Nature Astronomy.
[4] P. K. Panda,et al. Properties and astrophysical implications of the 150 Msun binary black hole merger GW190521 , 2020, 2009.01190.
[5] T. Dzhatdoev,et al. Search for high energy γ-rays from the direction of the candidate electromagnetic counterpart to the binary black hole merger gravitational-wave event S190521g , 2020, 2007.03086.
[6] Australian National University,et al. A DESGW Search for the Electromagnetic Counterpart to the LIGO/Virgo Gravitational-wave Binary Neutron Star Merger Candidate S190510g , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.
[7] S. Nissanke,et al. Implications of the search for optical counterparts during the second part of the Advanced LIGO’s and Advanced Virgo’s third observing run: lessons learned for future follow-up observations , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[8] P. K. Panda,et al. GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 M$_\odot$ Black Hole with a 2.6 M$_\odot$ Compact Object , 2020, 2006.12611.
[9] Adam A. Miller,et al. Kilonova Luminosity Function Constraints Based on Zwicky Transient Facility Searches for 13 Neutron Star Merger Triggers during O3 , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.
[10] D. Gerdes,et al. Constraints on the Physical Properties of GW190814 through Simulations Based on DECam Follow-up Observations by the Dark Energy Survey , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.
[11] D. A. Kann,et al. GRANDMA observations of advanced LIGO’s and advanced Virgo’s third observational campaign , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[12] R. Kotak,et al. Searching for electromagnetic counterparts to gravitational-wave merger events with the prototype Gravitational-Wave Optical Transient Observer (GOTO-4) , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[13] J. Ruan,et al. A Deep CFHT Optical Search for a Counterpart to the Possible Neutron Star–Black Hole Merger GW190814 , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.
[14] K. Kawaguchi,et al. Constraint on the Ejecta Mass for Black Hole–Neutron Star Merger Event Candidate S190814bv , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.
[15] M. L. Pumo,et al. Observational constraints on the optical and near-infrared emission from the neutron star–black hole binary merger candidate S190814bv , 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics.
[16] R. Foley,et al. Updated parameter estimates for GW190425 using astrophysical arguments and implications for the electromagnetic counterpart , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[17] E. Berger,et al. Does GW190425 Require an Alternative Formation Pathway than a Fast-merging Channel? , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.
[18] P. K. Panda,et al. GW190425: Observation of a Compact Binary Coalescence with Total Mass ∼ 3.4 M⊙ , 2020 .
[19] Iair Arcavi,et al. The Gravitational Wave Treasure Map: A Tool to Coordinate, Visualize, and Assess the Electromagnetic Follow-up of Gravitational-wave Events , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.
[20] J. Newman,et al. GROWTH on S190814bv: Deep Synoptic Limits on the Optical/Near-infrared Counterpart to a Neutron Star–Black Hole Merger , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[21] Y. N. Liu,et al. Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger , 2019, Proceedings of Multifrequency Behaviour of High Energy Cosmic Sources - XIII — PoS(MULTIF2019).
[22] Cody Messick,et al. A self-consistent method to estimate the rate of compact binary coalescences with a Poisson mixture model , 2019, Classical and Quantum Gravity.
[23] OUP accepted manuscript , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[24] P. Cowperthwaite,et al. Two Years of Nonthermal Emission from the Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817: Rapid Fading of the Jet Afterglow and First Constraints on the Kilonova Fastest Ejecta , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[25] P. Cowperthwaite,et al. A Galaxy-targeted Search for the Optical Counterpart of the Candidate NS–BH Merger S190814bv with Magellan , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[26] P. Cowperthwaite,et al. The Optical Afterglow of GW170817: An Off-axis Structured Jet and Deep Constraints on a Globular Cluster Origin , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[27] Eugene Serabyn,et al. GROWTH on S190425z: Searching Thousands of Square Degrees to Identify an Optical or Infrared Counterpart to a Binary Neutron Star Merger with the Zwicky Transient Facility and Palomar Gattini-IR , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[28] Paul S. Smith,et al. Searches after Gravitational Waves Using ARizona Observatories (SAGUARO): System Overview and First Results from Advanced LIGO/Virgo’s Third Observing Run , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[29] A. Mahabal,et al. GROWTH on S190510g: DECam Observation Planning and Follow-up of a Distant Binary Neutron Star Merger Candidate , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[30] M. Graham,et al. GROWTH on S190426c: Real-time Search for a Counterpart to the Probable Neutron Star–Black Hole Merger using an Automated Difference Imaging Pipeline for DECam , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[31] P. Cowperthwaite,et al. Follow-up of the Neutron Star Bearing Gravitational-wave Candidate Events S190425z and S190426c with MMT and SOAR , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[32] B. Metzger,et al. The Multi-messenger Matrix: The Future of Neutron Star Merger Constraints on the Nuclear Equation of State , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[33] A. Mahabal,et al. Transient processing and analysis using AMPEL: alert management, photometry, and evaluation of light curves , 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics.
[34] Umaa Rebbapragada,et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility: Science Objectives , 2019, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.
[35] W. Farr,et al. Limits on Electromagnetic Counterparts of Gravitational-wave-detected Binary Black Hole Mergers , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[36] Chris L. Fryer,et al. A luminosity distribution for kilonovae based on short gamma-ray burst afterglows , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[37] T Sakamoto,et al. A year in the life of GW170817: the rise and fall of a structured jet from a binary neutron star merger , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[38] A. Melandri,et al. Compact radio emission indicates a structured jet was produced by a binary neutron star merger , 2018, Science.
[39] Adam D. Myers,et al. Overview of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.
[40] Umaa Rebbapragada,et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility: Data Processing, Products, and Archive , 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.
[41] B. Metzger,et al. Constraining Stellar-mass Black Hole Mergers in AGN Disks Detectable with LIGO , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.
[42] M. Weiler,et al. Reanalysis of the Gaia Data Release 2 photometric sensitivity curves using HST/STIS spectrophotometry , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.
[43] C. Guidorzi,et al. A Decline in the X-Ray through Radio Emission from GW170817 Continues to Support an Off-axis Structured Jet , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.
[44] T. A. Lister,et al. Gaia Data Release 2. Summary of the contents and survey properties , 2018, 1804.09365.
[45] Rafael S. de Souza,et al. GLADE: A galaxy catalogue for multimessenger searches in the advanced gravitational-wave detector era , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[46] B. Stalder,et al. ATLAS: A High-cadence All-sky Survey System , 2018, 1802.00879.
[47] J. Hjorth,et al. A Precise Distance to the Host Galaxy of the Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817 Using Surface Brightness Fluctuations , 2018, 1801.06080.
[48] C. Guidorzi,et al. The Binary Neutron Star Event LIGO/Virgo GW170817 160 Days after Merger: Synchrotron Emission across the Electromagnetic Spectrum , 2018, 1801.03531.
[49] Miguel de Val-Borro,et al. The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.
[50] Caltech,et al. A mildly relativistic wide-angle outflow in the neutron-star merger event GW170817 , 2017, Nature.
[51] K. Wiersema,et al. The Diversity of Kilonova Emission in Short Gamma-Ray Bursts , 2017, The Astrophysical Journal.
[52] A. Corsi,et al. Binary black hole mergers within the LIGO horizon: statistical properties and prospects for detecting electromagnetic counterparts , 2017, 1708.09402.
[53] B. A. Boom,et al. Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA , 2013, Living Reviews in Relativity.
[54] P. Cowperthwaite,et al. The Combined Ultraviolet, Optical, and Near-infrared Light Curves of the Kilonova Associated with the Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817: Unified Data Set, Analytic Models, and Physical Implications , 2017, 1710.11576.
[55] M. Serra-Ricart,et al. MASTER Optical Detection of the First LIGO/Virgo Neutron Star Binary Merger GW170817 , 2017, 1710.05461.
[56] B. Metzger,et al. Origin of the heavy elements in binary neutron-star mergers from a gravitational-wave event , 2017, Nature.
[57] Saurabh W. Jha,et al. The Discovery of the Electromagnetic Counterpart of GW170817: Kilonova AT 2017gfo/DLT17ck , 2017, 1710.05854.
[58] J. Prochaska,et al. Swope Supernova Survey 2017a (SSS17a), the optical counterpart to a gravitational wave source , 2017, Science.
[59] A. Rest,et al. The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. III. Optical and UV Spectra of a Blue Kilonova from Fast Polar Ejecta , 2017, 1710.05456.
[60] Jr.,et al. The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. II. UV, Optical, and Near-infrared Light Curves and Comparison to Kilonova Models , 2017, 1710.05840.
[61] Dovi Poznanski,et al. Optical emission from a kilonova following a gravitational-wave-detected neutron-star merger , 2017, Nature.
[62] Alexei Pozanenko,et al. GRB 170817A Associated with GW170817: Multi-frequency Observations and Modeling of Prompt Gamma-Ray Emission , 2017, 1710.05448.
[63] M. M. Kasliwal,et al. A radio counterpart to a neutron star merger , 2017, Science.
[64] Vicky Kalogera,et al. A Deep Chandra X-Ray Study of Neutron Star Coalescence GW170817 , 2017, 1710.05852.
[65] Yi Hu,et al. Optical observations of LIGO source GW 170817 by the Antarctic Survey Telescopes at Dome A, Antarctica. , 2017, Science bulletin.
[66] Larry Denneau,et al. A kilonova as the electromagnetic counterpart to a gravitational-wave source , 2017, Nature.
[67] Lanthanides or Dust in Kilonovae: Lessons Learned from GW170817 , 2017, 1710.05863.
[68] P. Schipani,et al. Spectroscopic identification of r-process nucleosynthesis in a double neutron-star merger , 2017, Nature.
[69] Mariusz Gromadzki,et al. The Rapid Reddening and Featureless Optical Spectra of the Optical Counterpart of GW170817, AT 2017gfo, during the First Four Days , 2017, 1710.05853.
[70] Kazuya Matsubayashi,et al. J-GEM observations of an electromagnetic counterpart to the neutron star merger GW170817 , 2017, 1710.05848.
[71] K. Ulaczyk,et al. The Emergence of a Lanthanide-Rich Kilonova Following the Merger of Two Neutron Stars , 2017, 1710.05455.
[72] D. Frail,et al. Illuminating gravitational waves: A concordant picture of photons from a neutron star merger , 2017, Science.
[73] B. J. Shappee,et al. Early spectra of the gravitational wave source GW170817: Evolution of a neutron star merger , 2017, Science.
[74] J. Prieto,et al. Light curves of the neutron star merger GW170817/SSS17a: Implications for r-process nucleosynthesis , 2017, Science.
[75] A. Rest,et al. The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. VIII. A Comparison to Cosmological Short-duration Gamma-Ray Bursts , 2017, 1710.05438.
[76] C. Guidorzi,et al. The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. V. Rising X-Ray Emission from an Off-axis Jet , 2017, 1710.05431.
[77] A. Rest,et al. The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. IV. Detection of Near-infrared Signatures of r-process Nucleosynthesis with Gemini-South , 2017, 1710.05454.
[78] R. Nichol,et al. The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. I. Dark Energy Camera Discovery of the Optical Counterpart , 2017, 1710.05459.
[79] A. Rest,et al. An Empirical Study of Contamination in Deep, Rapid, and Wide-field Optical Follow-up of Gravitational Wave Events , 2017, 1710.02144.
[80] A. Molino,et al. Observations of the First Electromagnetic Counterpart to a Gravitational-wave Source by the TOROS Collaboration , 2017, 1710.05844.
[81] B. Metzger,et al. Kilonovae , 2016, Living Reviews in Relativity.
[82] B. Metzger,et al. Assisted inspirals of stellar mass black holes embedded in AGN discs: solving the ‘final au problem’ , 2016, 1602.04226.
[83] Gaia Collaboration,et al. The Gaia mission , 2016, 1609.04153.
[84] Kazuya Matsubayashi,et al. J-GEM Follow-Up Observations to Search for an Optical Counterpart of The First Gravitational Wave Source GW150914 , 2016, 1605.03216.
[85] N. M. Brown,et al. Prospects for Observing and Localizing Gravitational-Wave Transients with Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo , 2013, Living Reviews in Relativity.
[86] R. Kotak,et al. Machine learning for transient discovery in Pan-STARRS1 difference imaging , 2015, 1501.05470.
[87] Hilo,et al. THE ELEVENTH AND TWELFTH DATA RELEASES OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY: FINAL DATA FROM SDSS-III , 2015, 1501.00963.
[88] Rodrigo Fernandez,et al. Kilonova light curves from the disc wind outflows of compact object mergers , 2014, 1411.3726.
[89] C. Broeck,et al. Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector , 2014, 1408.3978.
[90] Oleg Korobkin,et al. Neutrino-driven winds from neutron star merger remnants , 2014, 1405.6730.
[91] B. Metzger,et al. Red or blue? A potential kilonova imprint of the delay until black hole formation following a neutron star merger , 2014, 1402.4803.
[92] John A. Peacock,et al. TWO MICRON ALL SKY SURVEY PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFT CATALOG: A COMPREHENSIVE THREE-DIMENSIONAL CENSUS OF THE WHOLE SKY , 2013, 1311.5246.
[93] Prasanth H. Nair,et al. Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy , 2013, 1307.6212.
[94] Emmanuel Bertin,et al. SCAMP: Automatic Astrometric and Photometric Calibration , 2010 .
[95] Peter W. A. Roming,et al. The Swift Ultra-Violet/Optical Telescope , 2002, SPIE Optics + Photonics.
[96] E. Bertin,et al. SExtractor: Software for source extraction , 1996 .
[97] Joshua R. Smith,et al. LIGO: the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory , 1992, Science.
[98] Doug Tody,et al. The Iraf Data Reduction And Analysis System , 1986, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.