Searches after Gravitational Waves Using ARizona Observatories (SAGUARO): Observations and Analysis from Advanced LIGO/Virgo's Third Observing Run

With the conclusion of the third observing run for Advanced LIGO/Virgo (O3), we present a detailed analysis of both triggered and serendipitous observations of 17 gravitational-wave (GW) events (7 triggered and 10 purely serendipitous) from the Searches After Gravitational-waves Using ARizona Observatories (SAGUARO) program. We searched a total of 4935 deg2 down to a median 5σ transient detection depth of 21.1 AB mag using the Mt. Lemmon 1.5 m telescope, the discovery engine for SAGUARO. In addition to triggered events within 24 hr, our transient search encompassed a time interval following GW events of <120 hr, providing observations on ∼1/2 of the events accessible to the Mt. Lemmon 1.5 m telescope. We covered 2.1%–86% of the LVC total probability (P total) for individual events, with a median P total ≈ 8% within <120 hr. Following improvements to our pipeline and the addition of serendipitous observations, we find a total of seven new optical candidates across five GW events, which we are unable to rule out after searching for additional information and comparing to kilonova models. Using both publicly available and our own late-time data, we investigated a total of 252 optical candidates for these 17 events, finding that only 65% were followed up in some capacity by the community. Of the total 252 candidates, we are able to rule out an additional 12 previously reported counterpart candidates. In light of these results, we discuss lessons learned from the SAGUARO GW counterpart search. We discuss how community coordination of observations and candidate follow-up, as well as the role of archival data, are crucial to improving the efficiency of follow-up efforts and preventing unnecessary duplication of effort with limited electromagnetic resources.

[1]  N. Yasuda,et al.  Optical follow-up observation for GW event S190510g using Subaru/Hyper Suprime-Cam , 2021, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan.

[2]  P. Brown,et al.  Swift Multiwavelength Follow-up of LVC S200224ca and the Implications for Binary Black Hole Mergers , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[3]  M. Graham,et al.  Optical follow-up of the neutron star–black hole mergers S200105ae and S200115j , 2020, Nature Astronomy.

[4]  P. K. Panda,et al.  Properties and astrophysical implications of the 150 Msun binary black hole merger GW190521 , 2020, 2009.01190.

[5]  T. Dzhatdoev,et al.  Search for high energy γ-rays from the direction of the candidate electromagnetic counterpart to the binary black hole merger gravitational-wave event S190521g , 2020, 2007.03086.

[6]  Australian National University,et al.  A DESGW Search for the Electromagnetic Counterpart to the LIGO/Virgo Gravitational-wave Binary Neutron Star Merger Candidate S190510g , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[7]  S. Nissanke,et al.  Implications of the search for optical counterparts during the second part of the Advanced LIGO’s and Advanced Virgo’s third observing run: lessons learned for future follow-up observations , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[8]  P. K. Panda,et al.  GW190814: Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of a 23 M$_\odot$ Black Hole with a 2.6 M$_\odot$ Compact Object , 2020, 2006.12611.

[9]  Adam A. Miller,et al.  Kilonova Luminosity Function Constraints Based on Zwicky Transient Facility Searches for 13 Neutron Star Merger Triggers during O3 , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[10]  D. Gerdes,et al.  Constraints on the Physical Properties of GW190814 through Simulations Based on DECam Follow-up Observations by the Dark Energy Survey , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[11]  D. A. Kann,et al.  GRANDMA observations of advanced LIGO’s and advanced Virgo’s third observational campaign , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[12]  R. Kotak,et al.  Searching for electromagnetic counterparts to gravitational-wave merger events with the prototype Gravitational-Wave Optical Transient Observer (GOTO-4) , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[13]  J. Ruan,et al.  A Deep CFHT Optical Search for a Counterpart to the Possible Neutron Star–Black Hole Merger GW190814 , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[14]  K. Kawaguchi,et al.  Constraint on the Ejecta Mass for Black Hole–Neutron Star Merger Event Candidate S190814bv , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[15]  M. L. Pumo,et al.  Observational constraints on the optical and near-infrared emission from the neutron star–black hole binary merger candidate S190814bv , 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[16]  R. Foley,et al.  Updated parameter estimates for GW190425 using astrophysical arguments and implications for the electromagnetic counterpart , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[17]  E. Berger,et al.  Does GW190425 Require an Alternative Formation Pathway than a Fast-merging Channel? , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[18]  P. K. Panda,et al.  GW190425: Observation of a Compact Binary Coalescence with Total Mass ∼ 3.4 M⊙ , 2020 .

[19]  Iair Arcavi,et al.  The Gravitational Wave Treasure Map: A Tool to Coordinate, Visualize, and Assess the Electromagnetic Follow-up of Gravitational-wave Events , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[20]  J. Newman,et al.  GROWTH on S190814bv: Deep Synoptic Limits on the Optical/Near-infrared Counterpart to a Neutron Star–Black Hole Merger , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[21]  Y. N. Liu,et al.  Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger , 2019, Proceedings of Multifrequency Behaviour of High Energy Cosmic Sources - XIII — PoS(MULTIF2019).

[22]  Cody Messick,et al.  A self-consistent method to estimate the rate of compact binary coalescences with a Poisson mixture model , 2019, Classical and Quantum Gravity.

[23]  OUP accepted manuscript , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[24]  P. Cowperthwaite,et al.  Two Years of Nonthermal Emission from the Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817: Rapid Fading of the Jet Afterglow and First Constraints on the Kilonova Fastest Ejecta , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[25]  P. Cowperthwaite,et al.  A Galaxy-targeted Search for the Optical Counterpart of the Candidate NS–BH Merger S190814bv with Magellan , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[26]  P. Cowperthwaite,et al.  The Optical Afterglow of GW170817: An Off-axis Structured Jet and Deep Constraints on a Globular Cluster Origin , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[27]  Eugene Serabyn,et al.  GROWTH on S190425z: Searching Thousands of Square Degrees to Identify an Optical or Infrared Counterpart to a Binary Neutron Star Merger with the Zwicky Transient Facility and Palomar Gattini-IR , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[28]  Paul S. Smith,et al.  Searches after Gravitational Waves Using ARizona Observatories (SAGUARO): System Overview and First Results from Advanced LIGO/Virgo’s Third Observing Run , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[29]  A. Mahabal,et al.  GROWTH on S190510g: DECam Observation Planning and Follow-up of a Distant Binary Neutron Star Merger Candidate , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[30]  M. Graham,et al.  GROWTH on S190426c: Real-time Search for a Counterpart to the Probable Neutron Star–Black Hole Merger using an Automated Difference Imaging Pipeline for DECam , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[31]  P. Cowperthwaite,et al.  Follow-up of the Neutron Star Bearing Gravitational-wave Candidate Events S190425z and S190426c with MMT and SOAR , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[32]  B. Metzger,et al.  The Multi-messenger Matrix: The Future of Neutron Star Merger Constraints on the Nuclear Equation of State , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[33]  A. Mahabal,et al.  Transient processing and analysis using AMPEL: alert management, photometry, and evaluation of light curves , 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[34]  Umaa Rebbapragada,et al.  The Zwicky Transient Facility: Science Objectives , 2019, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

[35]  W. Farr,et al.  Limits on Electromagnetic Counterparts of Gravitational-wave-detected Binary Black Hole Mergers , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[36]  Chris L. Fryer,et al.  A luminosity distribution for kilonovae based on short gamma-ray burst afterglows , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[37]  T Sakamoto,et al.  A year in the life of GW170817: the rise and fall of a structured jet from a binary neutron star merger , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[38]  A. Melandri,et al.  Compact radio emission indicates a structured jet was produced by a binary neutron star merger , 2018, Science.

[39]  Adam D. Myers,et al.  Overview of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.

[40]  Umaa Rebbapragada,et al.  The Zwicky Transient Facility: Data Processing, Products, and Archive , 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

[41]  B. Metzger,et al.  Constraining Stellar-mass Black Hole Mergers in AGN Disks Detectable with LIGO , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[42]  M. Weiler,et al.  Reanalysis of the Gaia Data Release 2 photometric sensitivity curves using HST/STIS spectrophotometry , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.

[43]  C. Guidorzi,et al.  A Decline in the X-Ray through Radio Emission from GW170817 Continues to Support an Off-axis Structured Jet , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[44]  T. A. Lister,et al.  Gaia Data Release 2. Summary of the contents and survey properties , 2018, 1804.09365.

[45]  Rafael S. de Souza,et al.  GLADE: A galaxy catalogue for multimessenger searches in the advanced gravitational-wave detector era , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[46]  B. Stalder,et al.  ATLAS: A High-cadence All-sky Survey System , 2018, 1802.00879.

[47]  J. Hjorth,et al.  A Precise Distance to the Host Galaxy of the Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817 Using Surface Brightness Fluctuations , 2018, 1801.06080.

[48]  C. Guidorzi,et al.  The Binary Neutron Star Event LIGO/Virgo GW170817 160 Days after Merger: Synchrotron Emission across the Electromagnetic Spectrum , 2018, 1801.03531.

[49]  Miguel de Val-Borro,et al.  The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.

[50]  Caltech,et al.  A mildly relativistic wide-angle outflow in the neutron-star merger event GW170817 , 2017, Nature.

[51]  K. Wiersema,et al.  The Diversity of Kilonova Emission in Short Gamma-Ray Bursts , 2017, The Astrophysical Journal.

[52]  A. Corsi,et al.  Binary black hole mergers within the LIGO horizon: statistical properties and prospects for detecting electromagnetic counterparts , 2017, 1708.09402.

[53]  B. A. Boom,et al.  Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA , 2013, Living Reviews in Relativity.

[54]  P. Cowperthwaite,et al.  The Combined Ultraviolet, Optical, and Near-infrared Light Curves of the Kilonova Associated with the Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817: Unified Data Set, Analytic Models, and Physical Implications , 2017, 1710.11576.

[55]  M. Serra-Ricart,et al.  MASTER Optical Detection of the First LIGO/Virgo Neutron Star Binary Merger GW170817 , 2017, 1710.05461.

[56]  B. Metzger,et al.  Origin of the heavy elements in binary neutron-star mergers from a gravitational-wave event , 2017, Nature.

[57]  Saurabh W. Jha,et al.  The Discovery of the Electromagnetic Counterpart of GW170817: Kilonova AT 2017gfo/DLT17ck , 2017, 1710.05854.

[58]  J. Prochaska,et al.  Swope Supernova Survey 2017a (SSS17a), the optical counterpart to a gravitational wave source , 2017, Science.

[59]  A. Rest,et al.  The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. III. Optical and UV Spectra of a Blue Kilonova from Fast Polar Ejecta , 2017, 1710.05456.

[60]  Jr.,et al.  The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. II. UV, Optical, and Near-infrared Light Curves and Comparison to Kilonova Models , 2017, 1710.05840.

[61]  Dovi Poznanski,et al.  Optical emission from a kilonova following a gravitational-wave-detected neutron-star merger , 2017, Nature.

[62]  Alexei Pozanenko,et al.  GRB 170817A Associated with GW170817: Multi-frequency Observations and Modeling of Prompt Gamma-Ray Emission , 2017, 1710.05448.

[63]  M. M. Kasliwal,et al.  A radio counterpart to a neutron star merger , 2017, Science.

[64]  Vicky Kalogera,et al.  A Deep Chandra X-Ray Study of Neutron Star Coalescence GW170817 , 2017, 1710.05852.

[65]  Yi Hu,et al.  Optical observations of LIGO source GW 170817 by the Antarctic Survey Telescopes at Dome A, Antarctica. , 2017, Science bulletin.

[66]  Larry Denneau,et al.  A kilonova as the electromagnetic counterpart to a gravitational-wave source , 2017, Nature.

[67]  Lanthanides or Dust in Kilonovae: Lessons Learned from GW170817 , 2017, 1710.05863.

[68]  P. Schipani,et al.  Spectroscopic identification of r-process nucleosynthesis in a double neutron-star merger , 2017, Nature.

[69]  Mariusz Gromadzki,et al.  The Rapid Reddening and Featureless Optical Spectra of the Optical Counterpart of GW170817, AT 2017gfo, during the First Four Days , 2017, 1710.05853.

[70]  Kazuya Matsubayashi,et al.  J-GEM observations of an electromagnetic counterpart to the neutron star merger GW170817 , 2017, 1710.05848.

[71]  K. Ulaczyk,et al.  The Emergence of a Lanthanide-Rich Kilonova Following the Merger of Two Neutron Stars , 2017, 1710.05455.

[72]  D. Frail,et al.  Illuminating gravitational waves: A concordant picture of photons from a neutron star merger , 2017, Science.

[73]  B. J. Shappee,et al.  Early spectra of the gravitational wave source GW170817: Evolution of a neutron star merger , 2017, Science.

[74]  J. Prieto,et al.  Light curves of the neutron star merger GW170817/SSS17a: Implications for r-process nucleosynthesis , 2017, Science.

[75]  A. Rest,et al.  The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. VIII. A Comparison to Cosmological Short-duration Gamma-Ray Bursts , 2017, 1710.05438.

[76]  C. Guidorzi,et al.  The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. V. Rising X-Ray Emission from an Off-axis Jet , 2017, 1710.05431.

[77]  A. Rest,et al.  The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. IV. Detection of Near-infrared Signatures of r-process Nucleosynthesis with Gemini-South , 2017, 1710.05454.

[78]  R. Nichol,et al.  The Electromagnetic Counterpart of the Binary Neutron Star Merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. I. Dark Energy Camera Discovery of the Optical Counterpart , 2017, 1710.05459.

[79]  A. Rest,et al.  An Empirical Study of Contamination in Deep, Rapid, and Wide-field Optical Follow-up of Gravitational Wave Events , 2017, 1710.02144.

[80]  A. Molino,et al.  Observations of the First Electromagnetic Counterpart to a Gravitational-wave Source by the TOROS Collaboration , 2017, 1710.05844.

[81]  B. Metzger,et al.  Kilonovae , 2016, Living Reviews in Relativity.

[82]  B. Metzger,et al.  Assisted inspirals of stellar mass black holes embedded in AGN discs: solving the ‘final au problem’ , 2016, 1602.04226.

[83]  Gaia Collaboration,et al.  The Gaia mission , 2016, 1609.04153.

[84]  Kazuya Matsubayashi,et al.  J-GEM Follow-Up Observations to Search for an Optical Counterpart of The First Gravitational Wave Source GW150914 , 2016, 1605.03216.

[85]  N. M. Brown,et al.  Prospects for Observing and Localizing Gravitational-Wave Transients with Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo , 2013, Living Reviews in Relativity.

[86]  R. Kotak,et al.  Machine learning for transient discovery in Pan-STARRS1 difference imaging , 2015, 1501.05470.

[87]  Hilo,et al.  THE ELEVENTH AND TWELFTH DATA RELEASES OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY: FINAL DATA FROM SDSS-III , 2015, 1501.00963.

[88]  Rodrigo Fernandez,et al.  Kilonova light curves from the disc wind outflows of compact object mergers , 2014, 1411.3726.

[89]  C. Broeck,et al.  Advanced Virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector , 2014, 1408.3978.

[90]  Oleg Korobkin,et al.  Neutrino-driven winds from neutron star merger remnants , 2014, 1405.6730.

[91]  B. Metzger,et al.  Red or blue? A potential kilonova imprint of the delay until black hole formation following a neutron star merger , 2014, 1402.4803.

[92]  John A. Peacock,et al.  TWO MICRON ALL SKY SURVEY PHOTOMETRIC REDSHIFT CATALOG: A COMPREHENSIVE THREE-DIMENSIONAL CENSUS OF THE WHOLE SKY , 2013, 1311.5246.

[93]  Prasanth H. Nair,et al.  Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy , 2013, 1307.6212.

[94]  Emmanuel Bertin,et al.  SCAMP: Automatic Astrometric and Photometric Calibration , 2010 .

[95]  Peter W. A. Roming,et al.  The Swift Ultra-Violet/Optical Telescope , 2002, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[96]  E. Bertin,et al.  SExtractor: Software for source extraction , 1996 .

[97]  Joshua R. Smith,et al.  LIGO: the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory , 1992, Science.

[98]  Doug Tody,et al.  The Iraf Data Reduction And Analysis System , 1986, Astronomical Telescopes and Instrumentation.