Measuring performance in precision agriculture: CART-A decision tree approach

Abstract Recently, there have been very rapid developments in hyperspectral remote sensing and interest is fast growing in the applications of hyperspectral data to precision farming. This paper investigates the potential of hyperspectral remote sensing data for providing better crop management information for use in precision farming by using an artificial intelligence (AI) approach. In this study, the ability of the classification and regression trees (CART) decision tree algorithm is examined to classify hyperspectral data of experimental corn plots into categories of water stress, presence of weeds and nitrogen application rates. In the summer of 2003, a three-factor split-split-plot field experiment representing different crop conditions was carried out. Corn was grown under irrigated and non-irrigated conditions with two weed management strategies: no weed control, and full weed control and with three nitrogen levels of 50, 150, and 250 kg N ha −1 . The hyperspectral data was recorded (spectral resolution = 1 nm) with a hand-held spectroradiometer at three developmental stages of corn—early growth, tasseling, and fully maturity. The CART decision tree algorithm was able to classify the 12 treatment combinations with 75–100% accuracy at all 3 recorded stages of development, although the best validation results were obtained at early growth stage. When decision trees (DTs) were generated to classify the plots according to two and then only one of the three factors (irrigation, weeds or nitrogen), the classification accuracy was ever highest. With the spectra obtained at early growth stage and single factor analysis, the classification accuracy was 96% for the irrigation factor, 83% for the nitrogen, and 100% for the weed control strategies.

[1]  Prasad S. Thenkabail,et al.  Inter-sensor relationships between IKONOS and Landsat-7 ETM+ NDVI data in three ecoregions of Africa , 2004 .

[2]  S. Prasher,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral data by decision trees and artificial neural networks to identify weed stress and nitrogen status of corn , 2003 .

[3]  James H. Everitt,et al.  Using Spatial Information Technologies to Map Chinese Tamarisk (Tamarix chinensis) Infestations , 1996, Weed Science.

[4]  J R Beck,et al.  Experiments to determine whether recursive partitioning (CART) or an artificial neural network overcomes theoretical limitations of Cox proportional hazards regression. , 1998, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[5]  R. B. Brown,et al.  Prescription Maps for Spatially Variable Herbicide Application in No-till Corn , 1995 .

[6]  E. M. Barnes,et al.  Multispectral data for mapping soil texture: possibilities and limitations. , 2000 .

[7]  Marvin E. Bauer,et al.  Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on growth and reflectance characteristics of winter wheat , 1986 .

[8]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  Maximizing land cover classification accuracies produced by decision trees at continental to global scales , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[9]  Lawrence W. Lass,et al.  Detection of Yellow Starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) and Common St. Johnswort (Hypericum perforatum) with Multispectral Digital Imagery , 1996, Weed Technology.

[10]  Shiv O. Prasher,et al.  DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS OF HYPERSPECTRAL DATA FOR ASSESSING WATER AND NITROGEN STRESSES IN CORN , 2005 .

[11]  Chun-Chieh Yang,et al.  PA—Precision Agriculture: Use of Hyperspectral Imagery for Identification of Different Fertilisation Methods with Decision-tree Technology , 2002 .

[12]  J R Beck,et al.  Artificial neural networks for medical classification decisions. , 1995, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[13]  Bo-Cai Gao,et al.  Column Atmospheric Water Vapor Retrievals From Awborne Imaging Spectrometer Data , 1989, 12th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,.

[14]  Sholom M. Weiss,et al.  Computer Systems That Learn , 1990 .

[15]  Leen-Kiat Soh,et al.  Segmentation of satellite imagery of natural scenes using data mining , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[16]  Reyer Zwiggelaar,et al.  A review of spectral properties of plants and their potential use for crop/weed discrimination in row-crops , 1998 .

[17]  N. Broge,et al.  Comparing prediction power and stability of broadband and hyperspectral vegetation indices for estimation of green leaf area index and canopy chlorophyll density , 2001 .

[18]  Heather McNairn,et al.  Estimation of Crop Cover and Chlorophyll from Hyperspectral Remote Sensing , 2001 .

[19]  Paul M. Mather,et al.  An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification , 2003 .

[20]  A. Goetz,et al.  Column atmospheric water vapor and vegetation liquid water retrievals from Airborne Imaging Spectrometer data , 1990 .

[21]  Margaret A. Nemeth,et al.  Applied Multivariate Methods for Data Analysis , 1998, Technometrics.

[22]  P. Thenkabail,et al.  Hyperspectral Vegetation Indices and Their Relationships with Agricultural Crop Characteristics , 2000 .

[23]  Rew,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy of mapping weeds in seedling crops using airborne digital imaging: Avena spp. in seedling triticale , 1999 .

[24]  Chun-Chieh Yang,et al.  Application of decision tree technology for image classification using remote sensing data , 2003 .

[25]  Vern C. Vanderbilt,et al.  Variability of Reflectance Measurements with Sensor Altitude and Canopy Type , 1982 .