Elementary School Student Development of STEM Attitudes and Perceived Learning in a STEM Integrated Robotics Curriculum

Robotics has been advocated as an emerging approach to engaging K-12 students in learning science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). This study examined the impacts of a project-based STEM integrated robotics curriculum on elementary school students’ attitudes toward STEM and perceived learning in an afterschool setting. Three elementary school teachers and 18 fourth to sixth graders participated in an eight-week-long program. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected and analyzed, and showed students’ attitudes toward math improved significantly at the end of the robotics curriculum. Three specific areas of perceived learning were identified, including STEM content learning and connection, engagement and perseverance, and development and challenge in teamwork. The findings also identified the opportunities and challenges in designing a STEM integrated robotics afterschool curriculum for upper elementary school students. Implications for future research studies and curriculum design are discussed.

[1]  Aran W. Glancy,et al.  Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education , 2014 .

[2]  J. Eccles,et al.  Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[3]  Yu-Hui Ching,et al.  Developing Computational Thinking with Educational Technologies for Young Learners , 2018 .

[4]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[5]  Adam V. Maltese,et al.  Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students , 2011 .

[6]  J. Conrad,et al.  Student Perceptions of a Summer Ventures in Science and Mathematics Camp Experience , 2016 .

[7]  Kimberly S. Maier,et al.  Why are we learning this? Using mixed methods to understand teachers’ relevance statements and how they shape middle school students’ perceptions of science utility , 2019, Contemporary Educational Psychology.

[8]  Fabiane Barreto Vavassori Benitti,et al.  Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Jacquelynne S Eccles,et al.  Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[10]  K. Cagiltay,et al.  Design and development issues for educational robotics training camps , 2014 .

[11]  James M. Conrad,et al.  Student Perceptions of a Summer Robotics Camp Experience , 2018 .

[12]  J. Eccles,et al.  Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[13]  Eric N. Wiebe,et al.  The Development and Validation of a Measure of Student Attitudes Toward Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (S-STEM) , 2015 .

[14]  Monica E. Cardella,et al.  Engineering in Pre-College Settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices , 2014 .

[15]  John Harrison,et al.  Computational Thinking: A Digital Age Skill for Everyone. , 2011 .

[16]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Measuring choice to participate in optional science learning experiences during early adolescence , 2015 .

[17]  Youngkyun Baek,et al.  Collaborative Robotics, More Than Just Working in Groups , 2018 .

[18]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  Constructionist Gaming: Understanding the Benefits of Making Games for Learning , 2015, Educational psychologist.

[19]  Margus Pedaste,et al.  LEARNING APPROACHES TO APPLYING ROBOTICS IN SCIENCE EDUCATION , 2013, Journal of Baltic Science Education.

[20]  Bradley S. Barker,et al.  Impact of Robotics and Geospatial Technology Interventions on Youth STEM Learning and Attitudes , 2010 .

[21]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[22]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[23]  Ahmad Khanlari,et al.  Teachers’ perceptions of the benefits and the challenges of integrating educational robots into primary/elementary curricula , 2016 .

[24]  Lou Slangen,et al.  What pupils can learn from working with robotic direct manipulation environments , 2011 .

[25]  David Scaradozzi,et al.  Teaching Robotics at the Primary School: An Innovative Approach☆ , 2015 .

[26]  Olatokunbo S. Fashola,et al.  Using Robotics and Game Design to Enhance Children’s Self-Efficacy, STEM Attitudes, and Computational Thinking Skills , 2016 .

[27]  Blaine A. Price,et al.  Using Robotics to Motivate ‘Back Door’ Learning , 2004, Education and Information Technologies.

[28]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Applications of case study research , 1993 .

[29]  Tamara J. Moore,et al.  Considerations for Teaching Integrated STEM Education , 2012 .

[30]  Yuxin Ma,et al.  Acquisition of Physics Content Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry Skills in a Robotics Summer Camp , 2007 .

[31]  Theodore J. Kopcha,et al.  Developing an Integrative STEM Curriculum for Robotics Education Through Educational Design Research , 2017 .

[32]  Amy Eguchi,et al.  Educational Robotics as a Learning Tool for Promoting Rich Environments for Active Learning (REALs) , 2015 .

[33]  Marina Umaschi Bers,et al.  Implementing a Robotics Curriculum in an Early Childhood Montessori Classroom , 2014, J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Innov. Pract..

[34]  Martin Kandlhofer,et al.  Evaluating the impact of educational robotics on pupils' technical- and social-skills and science related attitudes , 2016, Robotics Auton. Syst..