Effects of Hypothetical Interventions on Ischemic Stroke Using Parametric G-Formula.

Background and Purpose- Standard analytic approaches (eg, logistic regression) fail to adequately control for time-dependent confounding and, therefore, may yield biased estimates of the total effect of the exposure on the outcome. In the present study, we estimate the effect of body mass index, intentional physical activity, HDL (high-density lipoprotein) cholesterol, LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol, hypertension, and cigarette smoking on the 11-year risk of ischemic stroke by sex using the parametric g-formula to control time-dependent confounders. Methods- Using data from the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis), we followed 6809 men and women aged 45 to 84 years. We estimated the risk of stroke under 6 hypothetical interventions: maintaining body mass index <25 kg/m2, maintaining normotension (systolic blood pressure <140 and diastolic <90 mm Hg), quitting smoking, maintaining HDL >1.55 mmol/L, maintaining LDL <3.11 mmol/L, and exercising at least 210 minutes per week. The effects of joint hypothetical interventions were also simulated. Results- In men, the 11-year risk of ischemic stroke would be reduced by 85% (95% CI, 66-96) for all 6 hypothetical interventions. In women, this same effect was estimated as 55% (95% CI, 6-82). Conclusions- The hypothetical interventions explored in our study resulted in risk reduction in both men and women.

[1]  S. Greenland,et al.  The Implications of Using Lagged and Baseline Exposure Terms in Longitudinal Causal and Regression Models , 2018, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  M. Mansournia,et al.  Accounting for Time-Varying Confounding in the Relationship Between Obesity and Coronary Heart Disease: Analysis With G-Estimation The ARIC Study , 2018, American journal of epidemiology.

[3]  D. Altman,et al.  Population attributable fraction , 2018, British Medical Journal.

[4]  Goodarz Danaei,et al.  Hypothetical interventions to prevent stroke: an application of the parametric g-formula to a healthy middle-aged population , 2018, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[5]  G. Collins,et al.  Handling time varying confounding in observational research , 2017, British Medical Journal.

[6]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Global and regional effects of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with acute stroke in 32 countries (INTERSTROKE): a case-control study , 2016, The Lancet.

[7]  Sander Greenland,et al.  Sparse data bias: a problem hiding in plain sight , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[8]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Inverse probability weighting , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[9]  M. Kloss,et al.  Primary Preventive Potential for Stroke by Avoidance of Major Lifestyle Risk Factors: The European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition-Heidelberg Cohort , 2014, Stroke.

[10]  Sander Greenland,et al.  Matched designs and causal diagrams. , 2013, International journal of epidemiology.

[11]  J. Robins,et al.  Intervening on risk factors for coronary heart disease: an application of the parametric g-formula. , 2009, International journal of epidemiology.

[12]  R. Sacco,et al.  Physical activity and risk of ischemic stroke in the Northern Manhattan Study , 2009, Neurology.

[13]  Judith Wylie-Rosett,et al.  Diet and Lifestyle Recommendations Revision 2006: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Nutrition Committee , 2006, Circulation.

[14]  K. Aho,et al.  Cerebrovascular disease in the community: results of a WHO collaborative study. , 1980, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.