Student use of Facebook for organizing collaborative classroom activities

Social network sites such as Facebook are often conceived of as purely social spaces; however, as these sites have evolved, so have the ways in which students are using them. In this study, we examine how undergraduate students use the social network site Facebook to engage in classroom-related collaborative activities (e.g., arranging study groups, learning about course processes) to show how Facebook may be used as an informal tool that students use to organize their classroom experiences, and explore the factors that predict type of use. Data from two surveys (N = 302, N = 214) are used to analyze how Facebook use, social and psychological factors, self-efficacy, and types of instructor-student communication on Facebook are related to positive and negative collaboration among students. We found that predictors of Facebook use for class organizing behaviors include self-efficacy and perceived motivation to communicate with others using the site. When placed in the context of social and psychological factors, Facebook intensity did not predict either positive or negative collaboration, suggesting that how students used the site, rather than how often they used the tool or how important they felt it was, affected their propensity to collaborate.

[1]  Ed Diener,et al.  Recent Findings on Subjective Well-Being , 1997 .

[2]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  N. Ellison,et al.  Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis , 2008 .

[4]  Donald L. Mccabe.  The Influence of Situational Ethics on Cheating Among College Students , 1992 .

[5]  Claire O'Malley,et al.  Computer Supported Collaborative Learning , 1995, NATO ASI Series.

[6]  Bernard Widrow,et al.  Neural networks: applications in industry, business and science , 1994, CACM.

[7]  N. Selwyn.  Faceworking: exploring students' education‐related use of Facebook , 2009 .

[8]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychology Review.

[9]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  Social network activity and social well-being , 2010, CHI.

[10]  Minou Ella Mebane,et al.  Virtual communities in schools as tools to promote social capital with high schools students , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[11]  Josh Pasek,et al.  Facebook and Academic Performance: Reconciling a Media Sensation with Data , 2009, First Monday.

[12]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[13]  Shannon D. Smith,et al.  The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2009—Key Findings , 2010 .

[14]  Kathleen D. Vohs,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST DOES HIGH SELF-ESTEEM CAUSE BETTER PERFORMANCE, INTERPERSONAL SUCCESS, HAPPINESS, OR HEALTHIER LIFESTYLES? , 2022 .

[15]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[16]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  Gail Salaway,et al.  The ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2008 , 2007 .

[18]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers , 1994, CACM.

[19]  Patrick B. O'Sullivan,et al.  Mediated Immediacy , 2004 .

[20]  Christine Greenhow,et al.  Informal learning and identity formation in online social networks , 2009 .

[21]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[22]  Christine Greenhow,et al.  Old Communication, New Literacies: Social Network Sites as Social Learning Resources , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[23]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  The social organization of distributed cognition , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[24]  Adam N. Joinson,et al.  Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook , 2008, CHI.

[25]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[26]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[27]  Cheri J. Simonds,et al.  I'll See You On “Facebook”: The Effects of Computer-Mediated Teacher Self-Disclosure on Student Motivation, Affective Learning, and Classroom Climate , 2007 .

[28]  Werner Geyer,et al.  People Sensemaking and Relationship Building on an Enterprise Social Network Site , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[29]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Why CSCW Applications Fail: Problems in the Design and Evaluation of Organization of Organizational Interfaces. , 1988 .

[30]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices , 2011, New Media Soc..

[31]  J. Meek,et al.  Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: ‘It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work’ , 2009 .

[32]  Kerk F. Kee,et al.  Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?: Facebook Use and College Students’ Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation 1 , 2009 .

[33]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Changes in use and perception of facebook , 2008, CSCW.

[34]  M. Rosenberg.  Society and the adolescent self-image , 1966 .

[35]  Maureen S. Battistella,et al.  Connections: New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization , 1991 .

[36]  E. Diener,et al.  Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale , 1993 .

[37]  M. Rosenberg.  Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Rev. ed. , 1989 .

[38]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. , 2001 .