VANET topology characteristics under realistic mobility and channel models

Developing real-time safety and non-safety applications for vehicular ad hoc networks (VANET) requires understanding the dynamics of the network topology characteristics since these dynamics determine both the performance of routing protocols and the feasibility of an application over VANET. Using various key metrics of interest including node degree, number of clusters, link duration and link quality, we provide a realistic analysis of the VANET topology characteristics. In this analysis, we integrate real-world road topology and real-time data extracted from Freeway Performance Measurement System database into the microscopic mobility model in order to generate realistic traffic flows along the highway. Moreover, we use more realistic, recently proposed, obstacle-based channel model and compare the performance of this sophisticated model to the most commonly used more simplistic channel models including unit disc and log-normal shadowing model. Our investigation on the key system metrics reveal that largely used unit disc model fails to realistically model communication channel, while parameters of simplistic models like log normal can be adjusted to match the corresponding system metrics of more complex and hard to implement obstacle based model.

[1]  Yun-Pang Wang,et al.  Simulation of Urban Mobility , 2013, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[2]  Claude Oestges,et al.  Non-Stationary Narrowband MIMO Inter-Vehicle Channel Characterization in the 5-GHz Band , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[3]  Javier Gozálvez,et al.  Impact of the radio channel modelling on the performance of VANET communication protocols , 2012, Telecommun. Syst..

[4]  Leandros Tassiulas,et al.  On the structure and evolution of vehicular networks , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis & Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems.

[5]  Fredrik Tufvesson,et al.  Vehicular Channel Characterization and Its Implications for Wireless System Design and Performance , 2011 .

[6]  Xin Jin,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of the VANET Connectivity: Theory and Application , 2011, 2011 IEEE 73rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[7]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Analysis of Access and Connectivity Probabilities in Vehicular Relay Networks , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[8]  J. Deygout Multiple knife-edge diffraction of microwaves , 1966 .

[9]  Ilja Radusch,et al.  The influences of communication models on the simulated effectiveness of V2X applications , 2010, 2010 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference.

[10]  Fan Bai,et al.  Highway and rural propagation channel modeling for vehicle-to-vehicle communications at 5.9 GHz , 2008, 2008 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium.

[11]  Wai Chen,et al.  Ad hoc peer-to-peer network architecture for vehicle safety communications , 2005, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[12]  David W. Matolak,et al.  Vehicle–Vehicle Channel Models for the 5-GHz Band , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[13]  Fredrik Tufvesson,et al.  A geometry-based stochastic MIMO model for vehicle-to-vehicle communications , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[14]  Mate Boban,et al.  Impact of Vehicles as Obstacles in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[15]  Minglu Li,et al.  HERO: Online Real-Time Vehicle Tracking , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[16]  Ozan K. Tonguz,et al.  Dynamics of Network Connectivity in Urban Vehicular Networks , 2011, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[17]  Mohammed Ghanbari,et al.  Improving Propagation Modeling in Urban Environments for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[18]  Anis Laouiti,et al.  Vehicle Ad Hoc networks: applications and related technical issues , 2008, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[19]  Marco Fiore,et al.  The networking shape of vehicular mobility , 2008, MobiHoc '08.

[20]  Paolo Santi,et al.  Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication: Fair Transmit Power Control for Safety-Critical Information , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[21]  C. L. Giovaneli An analysis of simplified solutions for multiple knife-edge diffraction , 1984 .

[22]  Cristian Borcea,et al.  VANET Routing on City Roads Using Real-Time Vehicular Traffic Information , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[23]  J. Epstein,et al.  An Experimental Study of Wave Propagation at 850 MC , 1953, Proceedings of the IRE.

[24]  João Barros,et al.  Vehicular Connectivity Models: From Single-Hop Links to Large-Scale Behavior , 2009, 2009 IEEE 70th Vehicular Technology Conference Fall.

[25]  Marco Fiore,et al.  Large-scale urban vehicular mobility for networking research , 2011, 2011 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC).

[26]  Fan Bai,et al.  Mobile Vehicle-to-Vehicle Narrow-Band Channel Measurement and Characterization of the 5.9 GHz Dedicated Short Range Communication (DSRC) Frequency Band , 2007, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[27]  Wen-Long Jin,et al.  Broadcasting safety information in vehicular networks: issues and approaches , 2010, IEEE Network.

[28]  Werner Wiesbeck,et al.  Narrow-band measurement and analysis of the inter-vehicle transmission channel at 5.2 GHz , 2002, Vehicular Technology Conference. IEEE 55th Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC Spring 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37367).