From Physical Weight to Psychological Significance: The Contribution of Semantic Activations

Past research has shown that a physical experience can influence metaphorically linked psychological judgment. However, the underlying mechanisms have not been formally tested. This article examines the role of semantic activations underlying such influences, focusing on the effects of a ubiquitous physical experience--"carrying weight"--on consumers' judgment of importance. Five experiments provide converging evidence that semantic activation is the primary underlying process for the effect. Specifically, physically carrying a load is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for processing the concept of importance. The effect is fully mediated by semantic activation of related weight concepts. Moreover, processing the concept of importance does not necessarily influence the physical experience of carrying weight. An affective state such as mental stress (psychological load), however, does have a reciprocal effect on the physical experience of carrying weight, indicating that there might be different pathways between weight experience and its metaphorically linked concepts.

[1]  G. Clore,et al.  Affect and Information Processing , 1999 .

[2]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Rudimentary determinants of attitudes. II: Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  W. S. Rholes,et al.  Category accessibility and impression formation , 1977 .

[4]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. , 1990 .

[5]  J. Bargh,et al.  Experiencing Physical Warmth Promotes Interpersonal Warmth , 2008, Science.

[6]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. , 1999 .

[7]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[8]  Simone Schnall,et al.  With a Clean Conscience , 2008, Psychological science.

[9]  Lisa Aziz-Zadeh,et al.  Embodied semantics for actions: Findings from functional brain imaging , 2008, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[10]  Thomas W. Schubert Your highness: vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  A theory of goal systems. , 2002 .

[12]  R. Petty,et al.  The elaboration likelihood model , 2012 .

[13]  G. Clore,et al.  Feelings and phenomenal experiences , 1996 .

[14]  R. Petty,et al.  lhe Effects of Overt Head Movements on Persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of Responses , 1980 .

[15]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[16]  P. Niedenthal,et al.  Embodiment of emotion concepts. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Jing Wang,et al.  Psychological distance asymmetry: The spatial dimension vs. other dimensions , 2009 .

[18]  Katie A. Liljenquist,et al.  Washing Away Your Sins: Threatened Morality and Physical Cleansing , 2006, Science.

[19]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  Aparna A. Labroo,et al.  Half the Thrill Is in the Chase: Twisted Inferences from Embodied Cognitions and Brand Evaluation , 2010 .

[21]  Maureen Morrin,et al.  Does Touch Affect Taste? The Perceptual Transfer of Product Container Haptic Cues , 2008 .

[22]  Thomas W. Schubert,et al.  Weight as an Embodiment of Importance , 2009, Psychological science.

[23]  F. Strack,et al.  Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: a nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Chen-Bo Zhong,et al.  Cold and Lonely , 2008, Psychological science.

[25]  G. Lakoff,et al.  The Brain's concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[26]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Context Effects from Bodily Sensations: Examining Bodily Sensations Induced by Flooring and the Moderating Role of Product Viewing Distance , 2010 .

[27]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  G. Clore,et al.  Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. , 1983 .

[29]  J. Bargh,et al.  Nature of Priming Effects on Categorization , 1985 .

[30]  R. Wyer,et al.  Social Cognition, Inference, and Attribution , 1979 .

[31]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[32]  M. Sobel Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[33]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[34]  J. Bargh,et al.  Incidental Haptic Sensations Influence Social Judgments and Decisions , 2010, Science.

[35]  T. Chartrand,et al.  The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. , 2000 .

[36]  R. Gibbs Embodiment and Cognitive Science: Concepts , 2005 .

[37]  Arie W Kruglanski,et al.  Leading us not unto temptation: momentary allurements elicit overriding goal activation. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  Brian P. Meier,et al.  A metaphor-enriched social cognition. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[39]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.