Multisensor data fusion and feature extraction for forestry applications

In this paper we discuss feature level multisensor data fusion with P-, L-, and C-band polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (PolSAR) data and multispectral Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) data. The application is classification of Maritime pine age classes and bare ground in the Nezer forest in France. Multisensor data fusion is motivated by the complementary information available in SAR and optical data. Our objective is to investigate the choice of features among twenty six well known descriptors. First, we demonstrate the benefit of multisensor data fusion for improved classification performance over single sensor data classification with respect to forest monitoring. A comparison of the classification performances among the four different datasets reveals that the P-band SAR features yield the best results. By combining the P-band SAR features with the multispectral optical features, a significant classification accuracy improvement of 12.6% is achieved. Second, all twenty six features extracted in total from the four datasets are investigated for the purpose of identifying those features jointly possessing the highest discrimination power. Five features are found to preserve 98.5%of the classification information compared to classification based on the total set of features. This shows the advantage of feature selection with respect to preserving classification information while at the same time reducing the dimensionality of the feature space. A potential for improving the classification performance is also found by applying a thorough feature selection procedure.

[1]  J. L. van Genderen,et al.  Comparison and analysis of remote sensing data fusion techniques at feature and decision levels , 2006 .

[2]  E. Ricchetti,et al.  Visible?infrared and radar imagery fusion for geological application: A new approach using DEM and sun-illumination model , 2001 .

[3]  Karl-Heinz Prof Dr Ing Marek,et al.  Preliminary results of the comparative analysis of ERS-1 and ALMAZ-1 SAR data , 1994 .

[4]  D. Evans,et al.  Radar polarimetry: analysis tools and applications , 1988 .

[5]  E. Schanda,et al.  Remote sensing of the environment , 1978, Naturwissenschaften.

[6]  J. R. Jensen Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective , 2000 .

[7]  S. Franklin,et al.  OBJECT-BASED ANALYSIS OF IKONOS-2 IMAGERY FOR EXTRACTION OF FOREST INVENTORY PARAMETERS , 2006 .

[8]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Image fusion techniques for remote sensing applications , 2002, Inf. Fusion.

[9]  Stéphane Houzelle,et al.  Interpretation of remotely sensed images in a context of multisensor fusion using a multispecialist architecture , 1993, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[10]  J. Rolet,et al.  Extraction of spectral information from Landsat TM data and merger with SPOT panchromatic imagery: a contribution to the study of geological structures , 1993 .

[11]  Dirk H. Hoekman,et al.  Potential of airborne radar to support the assessment of land cover in a tropical rain forest environment , 1999 .

[12]  Corina da Costa Freitas,et al.  The study of ERS-1 SAR and Landsat TM synergism for land use classification , 2000 .

[13]  Patrick P. K. Chan,et al.  Empirical comparison of forward and backward search strategies in L-GEM based feature selection with RBFNN , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics.

[14]  Torbjørn Eltoft,et al.  Scale Mixture of Gaussian Modelling of Polarimetric SAR Data , 2006, Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Signal Processing Symposium - NORSIG 2006.

[15]  Pat Langley,et al.  Selection of Relevant Features and Examples in Machine Learning , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[16]  Anne H. Schistad Solberg Data Fusion for Remote-Sensing Applications , 2006 .

[17]  Lawrence S. Bernstein,et al.  A new method for atmospheric correction and aerosol optical property retrieval for VIS-SWIR multi- and hyperspectral imaging sensors: QUAC (QUick atmospheric correction) , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2005. IGARSS '05..

[18]  J. Rolet,et al.  Merging seasat and SPOT imagery for the study of geological structures in a temperate agricultural region , 1993 .

[19]  Vladimir Petrovic Multi-level image fusion , 2003 .

[20]  Christine Pohl,et al.  Multisensor image fusion in remote sensing: concepts, methods and applications , 1998 .

[21]  D. Leckie Synergism of synthetic aperture radar and visible/infrared data for forest type discrimination. , 1990 .

[22]  Christiaan Perneel,et al.  IMPROVED OBJECT RECOGNITION BY FUSION OF HYPERSPECTRAL AND SAR DATA , 2007 .

[23]  Eric Pottier,et al.  A review of target decomposition theorems in radar polarimetry , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[24]  D. L. Hall,et al.  Mathematical Techniques in Multisensor Data Fusion , 1992 .

[25]  David W. Aha,et al.  A Comparative Evaluation of Sequential Feature Selection Algorithms , 1995, AISTATS.

[26]  James Llinas,et al.  Multisensor Data Fusion , 1990 .

[27]  Manfred Ehlers,et al.  Multi-sensor image fusion for pansharpening in remote sensing , 2010 .

[28]  Zeng Zhi-yuan A Review on Methods of Atmospheric Correction for Remote Sensing Images , 2004 .

[29]  E. Pottier,et al.  Advanced Concepts In Polarimetry. Part 2: Polarimetric Target Classification , 2005 .

[30]  M. Govender,et al.  A review of hyperspectral remote sensing and its application in vegetation and water resource studies , 2009 .

[31]  I. Woodhouse Introduction to Microwave Remote Sensing , 2005 .

[32]  James Llinas,et al.  An introduction to multisensor data fusion , 1997, Proc. IEEE.

[33]  Jixian Zhang Multi-source remote sensing data fusion: status and trends , 2010 .

[34]  D. Amarsaikhan,et al.  The integrated use of optical and InSAR data for urban land‐cover mapping , 2007 .