Modeling Repeated Count Data Subject to Informative Dropout

In certain diseases, outcome is the number of morbid events over the course of follow-up. In epilepsy, e.g., daily seizure counts are often used to reflect disease severity. Follow-up of patients in clinical trials of such diseases is often subject to censoring due to patients dying or dropping out. If the sicker patients tend to be censored in such trials, estimates of the treatment effect that do not incorporate the censoring process may be misleading. We extend the shared random effects approach of Wu and Carroll (1988, Biometrics 44, 175-188) to the setting of repeated counts of events. Three strategies are developed. The first is a likelihood-based approach for jointly modeling the count and censoring processes. A shared random effect is incorporated to introduce dependence between the two processes. The second is a likelihood-based approach that conditions on the dropout times in adjusting for informative dropout. The third is a generalized estimating equations (GEE) approach, which also conditions on the dropout times but makes fewer assumptions about the distribution of the count process. Estimation procedures for each of the approaches are discussed, and the approaches are applied to data from an epilepsy clinical trial. A simulation study is also conducted to compare the various approaches. Through analyses and simulations, we demonstrate the flexibility of the likelihood-based conditional model for analyzing data from the epilepsy trial.

[1]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  An introduction to the bootstrap , 1993 .

[2]  R. Prentice,et al.  Correlated binary regression with covariates specific to each binary observation. , 1988, Biometrics.

[3]  J R Landis,et al.  Mixed effects logistic regression models for longitudinal binary response data with informative drop-out. , 1998, Biometrics.

[4]  L. Tierney,et al.  Accurate Approximations for Posterior Moments and Marginal Densities , 1986 .

[5]  W H Theodore,et al.  Felbamate Monotherapy: Implications for Antiepileptic Drug Development , 1995, Epilepsia.

[6]  J K Lindsey,et al.  On the appropriateness of marginal models for repeated measurements in clinical trials. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  Andrew L. Rukhin,et al.  Tools for statistical inference , 1991 .

[8]  P. Albert,et al.  Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[9]  N M Laird,et al.  Model-based approaches to analysing incomplete longitudinal and failure time data. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  J. Richard Landis,et al.  Model for the Analysis of Binary Longitudinal Pain Data Subject to Informative Dropout through Remedication , 1998 .

[11]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[12]  Irene A. Stegun,et al.  Handbook of Mathematical Functions. , 1966 .

[13]  K. Bailey,et al.  Estimation and comparison of changes in the presence of informative right censoring: conditional linear model. , 1989, Biometrics.

[14]  P S Albert,et al.  A two-state Markov mixture model for a time series of epileptic seizure counts. , 1991, Biometrics.

[15]  Roderick J. A. Little,et al.  Modeling the Drop-Out Mechanism in Repeated-Measures Studies , 1995 .

[16]  Raymond J. Carroll,et al.  Estimation and comparison of changes in the presence of informative right censoring by modeling the censoring process , 1988 .

[17]  John Hinde,et al.  Compound Poisson Regression Models , 1982 .

[18]  D. Follmann,et al.  An approximate generalized linear model with random effects for informative missing data. , 1995, Biometrics.

[19]  James M. Robins,et al.  Semiparametric Regression for Repeated Outcomes With Nonignorable Nonresponse , 1998 .