Radiosurgery treatment planning using conformal arc informed volumetric modulated arc therapy.

Linac based radiosurgery to multiple metastases is commonly planned with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) as it effectively achieves high conformality to complex target arrangements. However, as the number of targets increases, VMAT can struggle to block between targets, which can lead to highly modulated and/or nonconformal multi-leaf collimator (MLC) trajectories that unnecessarily irradiation of healthy tissue. In this study we introduce, describe, and evaluate a treatment planning technique called Conformal Arc Informed VMAT (CAVMAT), which aims to reduce the dose to healthy tissue while generating highly conformal treatment plans. CAVMAT is a hybrid technique which combines the conformal MLC trajectories of dynamic conformal arcs with the MLC modulation and versatility of inverse optimization. CAVMAT has 3 main steps. First, targets are assigned to subgroups to maximize MLC blocking between targets. Second, arc weights are optimized to achieve the desired target dose, while minimizing MU variation between arcs. Third, the optimized conformal arc plan serves as the starting point for limited inverse optimization to improve dose conformity to each target. Twenty multifocal VMAT cases were replanned with CAVMAT with 20Gy applied to each target. The total volume receiving 2.5Gy[cm3], 6Gy[cm3], 12Gy[cm3], and 16Gy[cm3], conformity index, treatment delivery time, and the total MU were used to compare the VMAT and CAVMAT plans. In addition, CAVMAT was compared to a broad range of planning strategies from various institutions (108 linear accelerator based plans, 14 plans using other modalities) for a 5-target case utilized in a recent plan challenge. For the linear accelerator-based plans, a plan complexity metric based on aperture opening area and perimeter, total monitor units (MU), and MU for a given aperture opening was utilized in the plan challenge scoring algorithm to compare the submitted plans to CAVMAT. After re-planning the 20 VMAT cases, CAVMAT reduced the average V2.5Gy[cm3] by 25.25 ± 19.23%, V6Gy[cm3] by 13.68 ± 18.97%, V12Gy[cm3] by 11.40 ± 19.44%, and V16Gy[cm3] by 6.38 ± 19.11%. CAVMAT improved conformity by 3.81 ± 7.57%, while maintaining comparable target dose. MU for the CAVMAT plans increased by 24.35 ± 24.66%, leading to an increased treatment time of 2 minutes. For the plan challenge case, CAVMAT was 1 of 12 linac based plans that met all plan challenge scoring criteria. Compared to the average submitted VMAT plan, CAVMAT increased the V10%Gy[%] of healthy tissue (Brain-PTV) by roughly 3.42%, but in doing so was able to reduce the V25%Gy[%] by roughly 3.73%, while also reducing V50%Gy[%], V75%Gy[%], and V100%Gy[%]. The CAVMAT technique successfully eliminated insufficient MLC blocking between targets prior to the inverse optimization, leading to less complex treatment plans and improved tissue sparing. Tissue sparing, improved conformity, and decreased plan complexity at the cost of slight increase in treatment delivery time indicates CAVMAT to be a promising method to treat brain metastases.

[1]  S. Ohira,et al.  HyperArc VMAT planning for single and multiple brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery: a new treatment planning approach , 2018, Radiation Oncology.

[2]  A. Beltramello,et al.  First experience and clinical results using a new non-coplanar mono-isocenter technique (HyperArc™) for Linac-based VMAT radiosurgery in brain metastases , 2018, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Physics considerations for single-isocenter, volumetric modulated arc radiosurgery for treatment of multiple intracranial targets. , 2016, Practical radiation oncology.

[4]  F. Yin,et al.  Single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases , 2017, Advances in radiation oncology.

[5]  F. Alongi,et al.  Linac-based radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with flattening filter-free volumetric modulated arc therapy in elderly patients , 2018, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[6]  F. Yin,et al.  Is a single isocenter sufficient for volumetric modulated arc therapy radiosurgery when multiple itracranial metastases are spatially dispersed? , 2016, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[7]  Anees Dhabaan,et al.  Single-Isocenter Multiple-Target Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Risk of Compromised Coverage. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  A comprehensive investigation of the accuracy and reproducibility of a multitarget single isocenter VMAT radiosurgery technique. , 2013, Medical physics.

[9]  R. Popple,et al.  Feasibility of single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc radiosurgery for treatment of multiple brain metastases. , 2010, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.

[10]  J. Wong,et al.  A method for optimizing LINAC treatment geometry for volumetric modulated arc therapy of multiple brain metastases. , 2010, Medical physics.

[11]  Jun Tan,et al.  Knowledge-based prediction of plan quality metrics in intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery. , 2015, Medical physics.

[12]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Optimization of Treatment Geometry to Reduce Normal Brain Dose in Radiosurgery of Multiple Brain Metastases with Single–Isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[13]  Lorenzo Livi,et al.  Impact of plan parameters on the dosimetric accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy. , 2013, Medical physics.

[14]  D. Verellen,et al.  Evaluation of a dedicated brain metastases treatment planning optimization for radiosurgery: a new treatment paradigm? , 2016, Radiation oncology.

[15]  Han Liu,et al.  Comparison of the progressive resolution optimizer and photon optimizer in VMAT optimization for stereotactic treatments , 2018, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[16]  S. Ryu,et al.  Evaluation of volumetric modulated arc therapy for cranial radiosurgery using multiple noncoplanar arcs. , 2011, Medical physics.

[17]  L. Gaspar,et al.  Comparative dosimetric study of three-dimensional conformal, dynamic conformal arc, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for brain tumor treatment using Novalis system , 2006 .

[18]  A. Bozzao,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: analysis of outcome and risk of brain radionecrosis , 2011, Radiation oncology.

[19]  Mark Oldham,et al.  Delivered Dose Distribution Visualized Directly With Onboard kV-CBCT: Proof of Principle. , 2019, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  Richard A Popple,et al.  Evaluation of multiple factors affecting normal brain dose in single-isocenter multiple target radiosurgery. , 2018, Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT.

[21]  J. H. Kim,et al.  The effect of MLC speed and acceleration on the plan delivery accuracy of VMAT. , 2015, The British journal of radiology.

[22]  Marta Paiusco,et al.  Efficiently train and validate a RapidPlan model through APQM scoring , 2018, Medical physics.

[23]  Gwe‐Ya Kim,et al.  Single-Isocenter Frameless Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiosurgery for Multiple Intracranial Metastases. , 2015, Neurosurgery.

[24]  R. L. Macdonald,et al.  Dynamic collimator trajectory algorithm for multiple metastases dynamic conformal arc treatment planning , 2018, Medical physics.

[25]  P. Shah,et al.  Vaccine against arteriosclerosis: an update , 2017, Therapeutic advances in vaccines.

[26]  B. Guthrie,et al.  Plan quality and treatment planning technique for single isocenter cranial radiosurgery with volumetric modulated arc therapy. , 2012, Practical radiation oncology.

[27]  P. Wen,et al.  Epidemiology of Brain Metastases , 2012, Current Oncology Reports.

[28]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  Re-examining TG-142 recommendations in light of modern techniques for linear accelerator based radiosurgery. , 2016, Medical physics.

[29]  R Lee MacDonald,et al.  Intra‐arc binary collimation algorithm for the optimization of stereotactic radiotherapy treatment of multiple metastases with multiple prescriptions , 2018, Medical physics.

[30]  Jinkoo Kim,et al.  Radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases with single-isocenter dynamic conformal arcs (SIDCA). , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[31]  L. Trodella,et al.  Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with brain metastases , 2014, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[32]  Mark Oldham,et al.  Comprehensive Radiation and Imaging Isocenter Verification Using NIPAM kV-CBCT Dosimetry. , 2020, Medical physics.

[33]  Volker W Stieber,et al.  Effect of Radiosurgery Alone vs Radiosurgery With Whole Brain Radiation Therapy on Cognitive Function in Patients With 1 to 3 Brain Metastases: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2016, JAMA.