Analyzing the Practice of Life Cycle Assessment

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a quantitative tool used to evaluate the environmental impacts of products or processes. With respect to buildings, LCA can be used to evaluate the environmental impacts of an entire building's life cycle. Currently LCA in the building area is used in a limited capacity, primarily to select building products. In order to determine the causality for the lack of whole‐building LCAs, focus groups with members of the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) communities were held. This article investigates the current level of knowledge of LCA in the AEC community and then discusses the benefits and barriers to the practice of LCA. In summary, the goal of the research was to identify why LCA is not used to its fullest potential in a whole‐building LCA. In an open forum and moderated setting, focus group participants were asked individually to self‐identify their experience with LCA, a brief education session on LCA was held, and then benefits and barriers to LCA were discussed. The focus group sessions were transcribed and systematically coded by social researchers in order to analyze the results. Hybrid flow and radar charts were developed. From the focus group results, the most important benefit to LCA was “provides information about environmental impacts.” The results did not identify a prominent barrier; however, building‐related metrics were ascertained to be one of the more crucial barriers. The benefits and barriers classified by this analysis will be utilized to develop a subsequent online survey to further understand the LCA and AEC community.

[1]  Amy E. Landis,et al.  Developing a Focus for Green Building Occupant Training Materials , 2009 .

[2]  A. Horvath,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment of Office Buildings in Europe and the United States , 2006 .

[3]  M. Narayan,et al.  Environmental assessment. , 1997, Home healthcare nurse.

[4]  J. Bertrand,et al.  Techniques for Analyzing Focus Group Data , 1992 .

[5]  J. Fava,et al.  Life‐Cycle Assessment Practitioner Survey: Summary of Results , 2006 .

[6]  Robert Ries,et al.  Example of a Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment of Construction Processes , 2006 .

[7]  Amy E. Landis,et al.  Determining Adequate Information for Green Building Occupant Training Materials , 2009 .

[8]  Carlos Machado,et al.  Developing an e-readiness model for higher education institutions: results of a focus group study , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[9]  David Evans,et al.  How LCA studies deal with uncertainty , 2002 .

[10]  Barbara C. Lippiatt,et al.  Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability (BEES): Software for Selecting Cost-Effective Green Building Products | NIST , 2001 .

[11]  J. Kitzinger,et al.  Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups , 1995 .

[12]  Henrikke Baumann,et al.  The hitch hiker's guide to LCA : an orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and application , 2004 .

[13]  Ansie Harding,et al.  Using radar charts with qualitative evaluation , 2008 .

[14]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Environmental assessment of products , 1997 .

[15]  Laura M. Naismith,et al.  Active Learning in Higher Education , 2007 .

[16]  Wesley W. Ingwersen,et al.  Can we compare the environmental performance of this product to that one? An update on the development of product category rules and future challenges toward alignment , 2012 .

[17]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Environmental assessment of products , 1999 .

[18]  P. Kidd,et al.  Getting the Focus and the Group: Enhancing Analytical Rigor in Focus Group Research , 2000, Qualitative health research.

[19]  J. Ivey.  Focus groups. , 2011, Pediatric nursing.

[20]  P Wargocki,et al.  Perceived air quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms and productivity in an office with two different pollution loads. , 1999, Indoor air.

[21]  Robert Ries,et al.  Estimating Construction Project Environmental Effects Using an Input-Output-Based Hybrid Life-Cycle Assessment Model , 2008 .

[22]  Melissa M. Bilec,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment Modeling of Construction Processes for Buildings , 2010 .

[23]  Michelle A. Saint-Germain,et al.  Surveys and Focus Groups in Health Research with Older Hispanic Women , 1993 .

[24]  J. L. Calderón,et al.  Focus groups: a qualitative method complementing quantitative research for studying culturally diverse groups. , 2000, Education for health.

[25]  J. Bertrand,et al.  The Comparability of Focus Group and Survey Results , 1991 .

[26]  P. Liamputtong.  Focus Group Methodology: Principles and Practice , 2011 .

[27]  John J. Reap,et al.  A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[28]  Scott Duncan,et al.  A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment , 2008 .

[29]  Patrick Hofstetter,et al.  What Users Want and May Need , 2003 .

[30]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications , 2003 .

[31]  Melissa M. Bilec,et al.  Residential Life Cycle Assessment Modeling: Comparative Case Study of Insulating Concrete Forms and Traditional Building Materials , 2010 .

[32]  Barbara C. Lippiatt,et al.  BEES 4.0: Building for Environmental and Economic Sustainability. Technical Manual and User Guide , 1998 .

[33]  Lorie A. Wagner.  Materials in the economy--material flows, scarcity, and the environment , 2002 .

[34]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Comparison of Environmental Effects of Steel- and Concrete-Framed Buildings , 2005 .