Multiproject baselines for evaluation of electric power projects

Calculating greenhouse gas emissions reductions from climate change mitigation projects requires construction of a baseline that sets emissions levels that would have occurred without the project. This paper describes a standardized multiproject methodology for setting baselines, represented by the emissions rate (kg C/kWh), for electric power projects. A standardized methodology would reduce the transaction costs of projects. The most challenging aspect of setting multiproject emissions rates is determining the vintage and types of plants to include in the baseline and the stringency of the emissions rates to be considered, in order to balance the desire to encourage no- or low-carbon projects while maintaining environmental integrity. The criteria for selecting power plants to include in the baseline depend on characteristics of both the project and the electricity grid it serves. Two case studies illustrate the application of these concepts to the electric power grids in eastern India and South Africa. We use hypothetical, but realistic, climate change projects in each country to illustrate the use of the multiproject methodology, and note the further research required to fully understand the implications of the various choices in constructing and using these baselines.

[1]  Sivan Kartha,et al.  Baseline recommendations for greenhouse gas mitigation projects in the electric power sector , 2004 .

[2]  Axel Michaelowa,et al.  Defining Investment Additionality for CDM projects—practical approaches , 2003 .

[3]  Alix Clark,et al.  The economics of energy efficiency for the poor—a South African case study , 2002 .

[4]  C. Marnay,et al.  Estimating carbon dioxide emission factors for the California electric power sector , 2002 .

[5]  Michael Milligan,et al.  Wind Energy and Power System Operations: A Survey of Current Research and Regulatory Actions , 2002 .

[6]  K. Chomitz Baseline, leakage and measurement issues: how do forestry and energy projects compare? , 2002 .

[7]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Multi-Project Baselines for Evaluation of Industrial Energy-Efficiency and Electric Power Projects , 2001 .

[8]  S. Parkinson,et al.  Accounting for flexibility against uncertain baselines: lessons from case studies in the eastern European energy sector , 2001 .

[9]  Tim Jackson,et al.  Welcome to Climate Policy , 2001 .

[10]  D H MacQueen,et al.  Environmental Report 1999 , 2000 .

[11]  K. Schumacher,et al.  Estimating carbon emissions avoided by electricity generation and efficiency projects: A standardized method (MAGPWR) , 2000 .

[12]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Sector trends and driving forces of global energy use and greenhouse gas emissions: focus in industry and buildings , 1999 .

[13]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Sectoral Trends and Driving Forces of Global Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 1998 .

[14]  S. Kartha,et al.  Practical Baseline Recommendations for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Projects in the Electric Power Sector OECD and IEA Information Paper , 2003 .

[15]  Tom Kerr,et al.  Average Displaced Emissions Rate (ADER): Approach and Methodology , 2002 .

[16]  Govinda R. Timilsina,et al.  The additionality criterion for identifying clean development mechanism projects under the Kyoto Protocol , 2002 .

[17]  Rune Dahlqvist,et al.  Annual Report 2000 , 2001, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[18]  Stephen Bernow,et al.  Key Issues in Benchmark Baselines for the CDM: Aggregation, Stringency, Cohorts, and Updating , 2000 .

[19]  P. Rogers,et al.  Baseline determination for greenhouse gas abatement by the Clean Development Mechanism and Joint Implementation under the Kyoto Protocol , 2022 .