The Concept of Anger: Universal or Culture Specific?

I will suggest that the English word ‘anger’ and its counterparts in diverse languages of the world are based on concepts of anger that have a great deal of complexity. This conceptual complexity derives from several sources: (1) the metaphors and metonymies that apply to the concepts in various languages; (2) the prototypes of anger that people share in these cultures, and (3) the many different senses that the word anger and its counterparts have in different languages. We can ask: Are there any universal aspects of the concept(s) of anger? On the basis of linguistic evidence from English, Chinese, Japanese, Hungarian, Zulu and Wolof, I will suggest that there are, but I will also claim that some of the aspects are culture specific. This raises the further important question of why there is both universality and culture specificity in the conceptualization of this emotion. At stake is the issue of which of the following two contradictory claims is valid: (1) that anger is conceptualized in the same way universally, or (2) that anger is a social construction and thus varies considerably from culture to culture. I will propose a compromise view, which can be called ‘body-based social constructionism’, that enables us to see anger and its counterparts as both universal and culture specific.

[1]  J. Averill.  Anger and Aggression: An Essay on Emotion , 1982 .

[2]  P. Ekman,et al.  Voluntary facial action generates emotion-specific autonomic nervous system activity. , 1990, Psychophysiology.

[3]  Language of love , 1982, Nature.

[4]  Ning Yu,et al.  Metaphorical Expressions of Anger and Happiness in English and Chinese , 1995 .

[5]  Z. Kövecses,et al.  Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling , 2000 .

[6]  B. Blount.  Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World. , 1996 .

[7]  G. Lakoff.  Women, fire, and dangerous things : what categories reveal about the mind , 1989 .

[8]  N. Presmeg.  The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason , 1992 .

[9]  G. Lakoff,et al.  The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English , 1983 .

[10]  Zoltán Kövecses,et al.  Metaphors of Anger, Pride and Love: A lexical approach to the structure of concepts , 1986 .

[11]  V. Sadock.  American Cool: Constructing a Twentieth-Century Emotional Style , 1995 .

[12]  Catherine Lutz,et al.  Cultural models in language and thought: Goals, events, and understanding in Ifaluk emotion theory , 1987 .

[13]  J. Taylor,et al.  Red dogs and rotten mealies: How Zulus talk about anger , 1998 .

[14]  P. Ekman,et al.  Emotion, physiology, and expression in old age. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[15]  Keiko Matsuki,et al.  Metaphors of anger in Japanese , 1995 .

[16]  D. Geeraerts,et al.  Looking back at anger: Cultural traditions and metaphorical patterns , 1995 .

[17]  Catherine A. Lutz.  Unnatural Emotions: Everyday Sentiments on a Micronesian Atoll and Their Challenge to Western Theory , 1988 .

[18]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Psycholinguistic studies on the conceptual basis of idiomaticity , 1990 .

[19]  Mark Rowlands,et al.  The body in mind , 1999 .

[20]  P. Ekman,et al.  Emotion and autonomic nervous system activity in the Minangkabau of west Sumatra. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  P. Ekman,et al.  Autonomic nervous system activity distinguishes among emotions. , 1983, Science.