A new 360° rotating type stimuli for improved SSVEP based brain computer interface

Abstract The authors investigated for first time clockwise and counter clockwise 360° rotating stimuli at two different speeds of rotation/phase for brain computer interface (BCI). The 360° rotating stimuli of frequencies 3 Hz, 7.5 Hz and 10 Hz are considered and compared to the performance with non-rotating flickering stimuli using signal-to-noise ratio at four channels Oz, Pz, O1 and O2. In addition, the authors have also attempted to study the effect of stimuli in varying combinations of four channels in discriminating stimuli frequencies. This paper investigated the discrimination of stimuli frequencies using power spectral density analysis (PSDA) and canonical correlation analysis (CCA) with information transfer rate (ITR). The results revealed the maximum average classification accuracy of 87.6 % is achieved from the single channel Oz, for clockwise rotating slow (CS) stimuli using CCA. The maximum average accuracy of 90.6 % is achieved from the channel combinations Oz, Pz, and O1 for CS rotating stimulus from CCA. It is noticed that, counter clockwise fast rotating stimulus is poor performing in single channel performance analysis. However, counter clockwise fast rotating stimulus has shown maximum average accuracy of 90 % considering all four channels with CCA. The maximum average ITR of 58.5 bit/min is achieved using signals of CS stimuli from the Oz channel and 65.1 bit/min is achieved with multichannel combination of Oz, Pz, O1 for clockwise slow rotating stimuli. The results indicate an enhancement in performance of SSVEP based BCI with clockwise rotating stimuli and may be considered for communication and or control applications.

[1]  Effect of stimulation shapes on the Steady-State Visual-Evoked response , 2015, 2015 41st Annual Northeast Biomedical Engineering Conference (NEBEC).

[2]  Shangkai Gao,et al.  A practical VEP-based brain-computer interface. , 2006, IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  A. Kohn Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Justin M. Ales,et al.  Assessing direction-specific adaptation using the steady-state visual evoked potential: results from EEG source imaging. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[5]  Yan Wang,et al.  Visual stimulus design for high-rate SSVEP BCI , 2010 .

[6]  Yijun Wang,et al.  Lead selection for SSVEP-based brain-computer interface , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Assessing the quality of steady-state visual-evoked potentials for moving humans using a mobile electroencephalogram headset , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[8]  C. Herrmann Human EEG responses to 1–100 Hz flicker: resonance phenomena in visual cortex and their potential correlation to cognitive phenomena , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Yu-Te Wang,et al.  A Comparison Study of Canonical Correlation Analysis Based Methods for Detecting Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials , 2015, PloS one.

[10]  Boualem Boashash,et al.  Surrogate data test for nonlinearity of EEG signals: A newborn EEG burst suppression case study , 2017, Digit. Signal Process..

[11]  Xingyu Wang,et al.  Frequency Recognition in SSVEP-Based BCI using Multiset Canonical Correlation Analysis , 2013, Int. J. Neural Syst..

[12]  Benjamin Wittevrongel,et al.  Frequency- and Phase Encoded SSVEP Using Spatiotemporal Beamforming , 2016, PloS one.

[13]  Yang Liu,et al.  Comparison of stimulus types in visual P300 speller of brain-computer interfaces , 2010, 9th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Informatics (ICCI'10).

[14]  Jarosław Żygierewicz,et al.  High Frequency SSVEP-BCI With Hardware Stimuli Control and Phase-Synchronized Comb Filter , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[15]  Dimitris Kugiumtzis,et al.  Measures of Analysis of Time Series (MATS): A MATLAB Toolkit for Computation of Multiple Measures on Time Series Data Bases , 2010, 1002.1940.

[16]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  L1-Regularized Multiway Canonical Correlation Analysis for SSVEP-Based BCI , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  Geethanjali Purushothaman,et al.  Investigation of multiple frequency recognition from single-channel steady-state visual evoked potential for efficient brain-computer interfaces application , 2018, IET Signal Process..

[18]  Sven P. Heinrich,et al.  Adaptation dynamics in pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials , 2001, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[19]  Guanghua Xu,et al.  Four Novel Motion Paradigms Based on Steady-State Motion Visual Evoked Potential , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Chang-Fa Yang,et al.  Miniature multiband monopole antenna for WWAN operation in laptop computer , 2010 .

[21]  Lora T. Likova,et al.  Anticlockwise or clockwise? A dynamic Perception-Action-Laterality model for directionality bias in visuospatial functioning , 2016, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[22]  Gao Xiaorong,et al.  Brain-computer interface based on the high-frequency steady-state visual evoked potential , 2005, Proceedings. 2005 First International Conference on Neural Interface and Control, 2005..

[23]  M. Alexander,et al.  Principles of Neural Science , 1981 .

[24]  Kenneth P. Camilleri,et al.  Phase-based SSVEPs for real-time control of a motorised bed , 2017, 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[25]  Jing Wang,et al.  Steady-State Motion Visual Evoked Potentials Produced by Oscillating Newton's Rings: Implications for Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2012, PloS one.

[26]  Annabelle Blangero,et al.  Exploiting individual primary visual cortex geometry to boost steady state visual evoked potentials , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[27]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  An online multi-channel SSVEP-based brain–computer interface using a canonical correlation analysis method , 2009, Journal of neural engineering.

[28]  Ivan Volosyak,et al.  Multiple Channel Detection of Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials for Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  Ronald M. Aarts,et al.  A Survey of Stimulation Methods Used in SSVEP-Based BCIs , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[30]  Yijun Wang,et al.  Time-frequency joint coding method for boosting information transfer rate in an SSVEP based BCI system , 2016, 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[31]  Piotr Milanowski,et al.  Towards an Optimization of Stimulus Parameters for Brain-Computer Interfaces Based on Steady State Visual Evoked Potentials , 2014, PloS one.

[32]  D. Spinelli,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of the cortical sources of the steady‐state visual evoked potential , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[33]  Toshihisa Tanaka,et al.  Phase detection of multi-channel SSVEPs via complex sparse spatial weighting , 2014, Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA), 2014 Asia-Pacific.

[34]  Qingguo Wei,et al.  A Comparative Study of Canonical Correlation Analysis and Power Spectral Density Analysis for SSVEP Detection , 2011, 2011 Third International Conference on Intelligent Human-Machine Systems and Cybernetics.

[35]  Wei Wu,et al.  Frequency Recognition Based on Canonical Correlation Analysis for SSVEP-Based BCIs , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  M. Carandini,et al.  Visual cortex: Fatigue and adaptation , 2000, Current Biology.

[37]  Dewen Hu,et al.  Retinotopic and topographic analyses with gaze restriction for steady-state visual evoked potentials , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[38]  Alexander Maye,et al.  Utilizing Retinotopic Mapping for a Multi-Target SSVEP BCI With a Single Flicker Frequency , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[39]  E. Lalor,et al.  A comparison of covert and overt attention as a control option in a steady-state visual evoked potential-based brain computer interface , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.