Emerging Technologies for HIV Prevention for MSM: What We have Learned, and Ways Forward

Abstract:Technology-enabled HIV research and prevention has emerged in the past 10 years as an exciting dynamic field that offers great potential to help bring HIV prevention efforts to scale in key risk communities. Evolutions in technologies and in HIV epidemics suggest mutual opportunities to reach most at risk populations in novel ways. New technologies cannot completely replace interventions and services currently delivered by the people. However, we suggest that emerging technologies hold promise to bring services to scale and produce efficiencies in reaching rural populations of men who have sex with men (MSM), connecting with populations who are not reached in current urban outreach efforts, and providing services or research surveys that can be described algorithmically. Furthermore, the types of technologies (eg, internet-based, smartphone-based, text messaging) should be matched with both the content to be delivered and the technology usage patterns of target populations. We suggest several key principles and lessons learned that comprise a framework in which to consider the opportunities of technologies and HIV prevention and research. Future directions include improvement of data quality in online surveying, better characterization of biases, developing improved sampling approaches, working with funders to ensure compatibility of funding mechanisms and online research proposals, and promoting consensus approaches to the duplication and presentation of research and program evaluation results from online research. Given the current calls for comprehensive packages of prevention services for MSM, effective prevention might require an intentional combination of technology-enabled prevention services to achieve scale and strategic use of personally delivered package components in cases where non-algorithmic services, such as individualized counseling, are needed.

[1]  Gunther Eysenbach,et al.  Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) , 2004, Journal of medical Internet research.

[2]  Kathryn Zickuhr,et al.  65% of Online Adults Use Social Networking Sites , 2011 .

[3]  J. Wyatt,et al.  Using the Internet for Surveys and Health Research , 2002, Journal of medical Internet research.

[4]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Portraits of American Internet UseFindings from the Pew Internet and American Life Project , 2006 .

[5]  C. Ciesielski.  Sexually transmitted diseases in men who have sex with men: An epidemiologic review , 2003, Current infectious disease reports.

[6]  K. Horvath,et al.  A randomized control trial of Internet-delivered HIV prevention targeting rural MSM. , 2006, Health education research.

[7]  J. Stoker,et al.  The Department of Health and Human Services. , 1999, Home healthcare nurse.

[8]  Atlanta,et al.  Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. , 2006, MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports.

[9]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  E. Weiderpass,et al.  Feasibility of Using Web-based Questionnaires in Large Population-based Epidemiological Studies , 2005, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[11]  M. McFarlane,et al.  Web 2.0 and beyond: risks for sexually transmitted infections and opportunities for prevention , 2009, Current opinion in infectious diseases.

[12]  D. Fleming,et al.  Trends in HIV/AIDS diagnoses among men who have sex with men--33 states, 2001-2006. , 2008, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[13]  David Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  Brian Mustanski,et al.  Getting wired: Exploiting the internet for the collection of valid sexuality data , 2001 .

[15]  Jan-Eric Litton,et al.  New times, new needs; e-epidemiology , 2007, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[16]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[17]  Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus,et al.  Innovation in sexually transmitted disease and HIV prevention: internet and mobile phone delivery vehicles for global diffusion. , 2010, Current opinion in psychiatry.

[18]  Jeremy C. Wyatt,et al.  When to Use Web-based Surveys , 2000, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[19]  Candice M. Daniel,et al.  Identifying Multiple Submissions in Internet Research: Preserving Data Integrity , 2008, AIDS and Behavior.

[20]  Manuel Blum,et al.  reCAPTCHA: Human-Based Character Recognition via Web Security Measures , 2008, Science.

[21]  Laura J Gurak,et al.  A Concise Guide to Technical Communication , 2000 .

[22]  C. Kent,et al.  Risk Factors for Early Syphilis Among Gay and Bisexual Men Seen in an STD Clinic: San Francisco, 2002–2003 , 2005, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[23]  N. Cox,et al.  Prevention and Control of Influenza: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). , 2006, MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports.

[24]  Ben S Cooper,et al.  The ORION statement: guidelines for transparent reporting of outbreak reports and intervention studies of nosocomial infection. , 2007, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[25]  Gary Marks,et al.  Meta-analytic Examination of Online Sex-Seeking and Sexual Risk Behavior Among Men Who Have Sex With Men , 2006, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[26]  Ruiguang Song,et al.  Estimated HIV Incidence in the United States, 2006–2009 , 2011, PloS one.

[27]  P. Sullivan,et al.  Bias in Online Recruitment and Retention of Racial and Ethnic Minority Men Who Have Sex With Men , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[28]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Social Implications of the Internet , 2001 .

[29]  B. Branson,et al.  Vital signs: HIV testing and diagnosis among adults--United States, 2001-2009. , 2010, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[30]  Y. Laouris,et al.  Disclosure of personal and contact information by young people in social networking sites: An analysis using Facebook ™ profiles as an example , 2010 .

[31]  D. Preston,et al.  The influence of stigma on the sexual risk behavior of rural men who have sex with men. , 2004, AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education.

[32]  K. Jones,et al.  Epidemiologic data on young men of color who have sex with men. , 2011, AIDS patient care and STDs.

[33]  S. Pocock,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2007, Preventive medicine.

[34]  D. Moher,et al.  CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[35]  Danoush Hosseinzadeh,et al.  Gaussian Mixture Modeling of Keystroke Patterns for Biometric Applications , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[36]  Joseph A. Konstan,et al.  The Story of Subject Naught: A Cautionary but Optimistic Tale of Internet Survey Research , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[37]  Douglas D. Heckathorn,et al.  Respondent-driven sampling : A new approach to the study of hidden populations , 1997 .

[38]  Joseph A. Konstan,et al.  The Challenges of Ensuring Participant Consent in Internet-based Sex Studies: A Case Study of the Men's INTernet Sex (MINTS-I and II) Studies , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[39]  M. Gottlieb,et al.  Pneumocystis pneumonia--Los Angeles. , 2006, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.