A mechanical explanation of RNA pseudoknot function in programmed ribosomal frameshifting

The triplet-based genetic code requires that translating ribosomes maintain the reading frame of a messenger RNA faithfully to ensure correct protein synthesis. However, in programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting, a specific subversion of frame maintenance takes place, wherein the ribosome is forced to shift one nucleotide backwards into an overlapping reading frame and to translate an entirely new sequence of amino acids. This process is indispensable in the replication of numerous viral pathogens, including HIV and the coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome, and is also exploited in the expression of several cellular genes. Frameshifting is promoted by an mRNA signal composed of two essential elements: a heptanucleotide ‘slippery’ sequence and an adjacent mRNA secondary structure, most often an mRNA pseudoknot. How these components operate together to manipulate the ribosome is unknown. Here we describe the observation of a ribosome–mRNA pseudoknot complex that is stalled in the process of -1 frameshifting. Cryoelectron microscopic imaging of purified mammalian 80S ribosomes from rabbit reticulocytes paused at a coronavirus pseudoknot reveals an intermediate of the frameshifting process. From this it can be seen how the pseudoknot interacts with the ribosome to block the mRNA entrance channel, compromising the translocation process and leading to a spring-like deformation of the P-site transfer RNA. In addition, we identify movements of the likely eukaryotic ribosomal helicase and confirm a direct interaction between the translocase eEF2 and the P-site tRNA. Together, the structural changes provide a mechanical explanation of how the pseudoknot manipulates the ribosome into a different reading frame.

[1]  Terri Goss Kinzy,et al.  Two crystal structures demonstrate large conformational changes in the eukaryotic ribosomal translocase , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[2]  J. Gallant,et al.  The function of a ribosomal frameshifting signal from human immunodeficiency virus‐1 in Escherichia coli , 1994, Molecular microbiology.

[3]  O. Namy,et al.  Reprogrammed genetic decoding in cellular gene expression. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[4]  J. F. Atkins,et al.  Overriding standard decoding: implications of recoding for ribosome function and enrichment of gene expression. , 2001, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[5]  R. Weiss,et al.  E. coli ribosomes re-phase on retroviral frameshift signals at rates ranging from 2 to 50 percent. , 1989, The New biologist.

[6]  Jonathan D. Dinman,et al.  Kinetics of Ribosomal Pausing during Programmed −1 Translational Frameshifting , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[7]  J. Zou,et al.  Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. , 1991, Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography.

[8]  Scott M Stagg,et al.  Incorporation of aminoacyl-tRNA into the ribosome as seen by cryo-electron microscopy , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[9]  P. Farabaugh.  Programmed translational frameshifting. , 1996, Annual review of genetics.

[10]  J. Lepault,et al.  Electronic Reprint Biological Crystallography on the Fitting of Model Electron Densities into Em Reconstructions: a Reciprocal-space Formulation , 2022 .

[11]  J. Dinman,et al.  The 9-A solution: how mRNA pseudoknots promote efficient programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting. , 2003, RNA.

[12]  Harry F. Noller,et al.  The Path of Messenger RNA through the Ribosome , 2001, Cell.

[13]  I. Brierley,et al.  Mutational analysis of the “slippery-sequence” component of a coronavirus ribosomal frameshifting signal , 1992, Journal of Molecular Biology.

[14]  S. Napthine,et al.  Ribosomal Pausing at a Frameshifter RNA Pseudoknot Is Sensitive to Reading Phase but Shows Little Correlation with Frameshift Efficiency , 2001, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[15]  I. Brierley,et al.  Characterization of an efficient coronavirus ribosomal frameshifting signal: Requirement for an RNA pseudoknot , 1989, Cell.

[16]  R M Esnouf,et al.  Further additions to MolScript version 1.4, including reading and contouring of electron-density maps. , 1999, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[17]  V. Ramakrishnan,et al.  First published online as a Review in Advance on February 25, 2005 STRUCTURAL INSIGHTS INTO TRANSLATIONAL , 2022 .

[18]  H. Varmus,et al.  Expression of the Rous sarcoma virus pol gene by ribosomal frameshifting. , 1985, Science.

[19]  J A Bruenn,et al.  Ribosomal movement impeded at a pseudoknot required for frameshifting. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  I. Brierley,et al.  Programmed ribosomal frameshifting in HIV-1 and the SARS–CoV , 2005, Virus Research.

[21]  Narayanan Eswar,et al.  Structure of the 80S Ribosome from Saccharomyces cerevisiae—tRNA-Ribosome and Subunit-Subunit Interactions , 2001, Cell.

[22]  Joachim Frank,et al.  A ratchet-like inter-subunit reorganization of the ribosome during translocation , 2000, Nature.

[23]  I. Brierley,et al.  Ribosomal pausing during translation of an RNA pseudoknot , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[24]  E A Merritt,et al.  Raster3D Version 2.0. A program for photorealistic molecular graphics. , 1994, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[25]  H. Noller,et al.  mRNA Helicase Activity of the Ribosome , 2005, Cell.

[26]  A Leith,et al.  SPIDER and WEB: processing and visualization of images in 3D electron microscopy and related fields. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[27]  M van Heel,et al.  A new generation of the IMAGIC image processing system. , 1996, Journal of structural biology.

[28]  J. Ballesta,et al.  Domain movements of elongation factor eEF2 and the eukaryotic 80S ribosome facilitate tRNA translocation , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[29]  H. Varmus,et al.  Signals for ribosomal frameshifting in the rous sarcoma virus gag-pol region , 1988, Cell.