Detection of deception based on fMRI activation patterns underlying the production of a deceptive response and receiving feedback about the success of the deception after a mock murder crime.

The ability of a deceiver to track a victim's ongoing judgments about the truthfulness of the deceit can be critical for successful deception. However, no study has yet investigated the neural circuits underlying receiving a judgment about one's lie. To explore this issue, we used a modified Guilty Knowledge Test in a mock murder situation to simultaneously record the neural responses involved in producing deception and later when judgments of that deception were made. Producing deception recruited the bilateral inferior parietal lobules (IPLs), right ventral lateral prefrontal (VLPF) areas and right striatum, among which the activation of the right VLPF contributed mostly to diagnosing the identities of the participants, correctly diagnosing 81.25% of 'murderers' and 81.25% of 'innocents'. Moreover, the participant's response when their deception was successful uniquely recruited the right middle frontal gyrus, bilateral IPLs, bilateral orbitofrontal cortices, bilateral middle temporal gyrus and left cerebellum, among which the right IPL contributed mostly to diagnosing participants' identities, correctly diagnosing 93.75% of murderers and 87.5% of innocents. This study shows that neural activity associated with being a successful liar (or not) is a feasible indicator for detecting lies and may be more valid than neural activity associated with producing deception.

[1]  I. Wilkinson,et al.  The functional anatomical distinction between truth telling and deception is preserved among people with schizophrenia. , 2011, Criminal behaviour and mental health : CBMH.

[2]  M. George,et al.  A replication study of the neural correlates of deception. , 2004, Behavioral neuroscience.

[3]  J. Downar,et al.  The Effect of Task Relevance on the Cortical Response to Changes in Visual and Auditory Stimuli: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2001, NeuroImage.

[4]  William B. McGregor,et al.  What if I Get Busted? Deception, Choice, and Decision-Making in Social Interaction , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[5]  M. Seghier The Angular Gyrus , 2013, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[6]  HighWire Press Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London , 1781, The London Medical Journal.

[7]  R. Goebel,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of target detection: an fMRI study of visual and auditory oddball tasks. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  Sean A. Spence,et al.  Playing Devil's advocate†: The case against fMRI lie detection , 2008 .

[9]  Giorgio Ganis,et al.  Lying in the scanner: Covert countermeasures disrupt deception detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2011, NeuroImage.

[10]  Kimberly S. Mapes,et al.  Replication of Functional MRI Detection of Deception. , 2009, The open forensic science journal.

[11]  P. Stoeter,et al.  Covariations among fMRI, skin conductance, and behavioral data during processing of concealed information , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[12]  M. Dolan,et al.  Psychopathic traits and deception: functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 2009, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[13]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. , 2012, Annual review of neuroscience.

[14]  B. Ardekani,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of brain activity in the visual oddball task. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[15]  N. Lynöe,et al.  Informed consent: study of quality of information given to participants in a clinical trial. , 1991, BMJ.

[16]  R. C. Gur,et al.  Brain Activity during Simulated Deception: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[17]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Infrequent events transiently activate human prefrontal and parietal cortex as measured by functional MRI. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Chetwyn C. H. Chan,et al.  Lie detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[19]  Tobias Egner,et al.  Intentional false responding shares neural substrates with response conflict and cognitive control , 2005, NeuroImage.

[20]  J. Downar,et al.  A cortical network sensitive to stimulus salience in a neutral behavioral context across multiple sensory modalities. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  T. Yoshiura,et al.  Functional MRI study of auditory and visual oddball tasks. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[22]  Xinghua Lu,et al.  Functional MRI Detection of Deception After Committing a Mock Sabotage Crime * , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[23]  J. Lorberbaum,et al.  A pilot study of functional magnetic resonance imaging brain correlates of deception in healthy young men. , 2004, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[24]  J. Downar,et al.  A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  Timothy J Ziemlewicz,et al.  Neural correlates of telling lies: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study at 4 Tesla. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[26]  T. Goldberg,et al.  Brain regions underlying response inhibition and interference monitoring and suppression , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  野瀬 出 Disclosing concealed information on the basis of cortical activations , 2009 .

[28]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  The parietal cortex and episodic memory: an attentional account , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  Daniel D. Langleben,et al.  Detection of deception with fMRI: Are we there yet? , 2008 .

[30]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Using fMRI to decompose the neural processes underlying the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test , 2006, NeuroImage.

[31]  T. Farrow,et al.  A cognitive neurobiological account of deception: evidence from functional neuroimaging. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[32]  Tom Manly,et al.  The engagement of mid‐ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and posterior brain regions in intentional cognitive activity , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[33]  R. Gur,et al.  Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event‐related fMRI , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[34]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control: The role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward-based learning , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[35]  S. Spence,et al.  Looking for truth and finding lies: The prospects for a nascent neuroimaging of deception , 2008, Neurocase.

[36]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Event-related fMRI of auditory and visual oddball tasks. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[37]  C. Frith,et al.  Detecting deception: the scope and limits , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  Kevin A. Johnson,et al.  Detecting Deception Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2005, Biological Psychiatry.

[39]  R. Poldrack Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Classifying spatial patterns of brain activity with machine learning methods: Application to lie detection , 2005, NeuroImage.

[41]  K. Kiehl,et al.  Neural sources involved in auditory target detection and novelty processing: an event-related fMRI study. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[42]  I. Wilkinson,et al.  Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans , 2001, Neuroreport.

[43]  Nobuhito Abe,et al.  How the Brain Shapes Deception , 2011, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[44]  J. Ford,et al.  Combined event‐related fMRI and EEG evidence for temporal—parietal cortex activation during target detection , 1997, Neuroreport.