The lexical access of multiple words during a single fixation: overlapping access processes?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Elizabeth R Schotter,et al. Eye Movements and Comprehension Are Important to Reading , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[2] Wayne S. Murray,et al. Early, Mandatory, Pragmatic Processing , 1998 .
[3] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. Semantic preview benefit in eye movements during reading: A parafoveal fast-priming study. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[4] K I Forster,et al. Evidence for lexical access in a simultaneous matching task , 1975, Memory & cognition.
[5] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[6] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Parallel semantic processing in reading revisited: effects of translation equivalents in bilingual readers , 2018 .
[7] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Readers Are Parallel Processors , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[8] G. V. Simpson,et al. Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.
[9] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. , 2005, Psychological review.
[10] G. McConkie,et al. Asymmetry of the perceptual span in reading , 1976 .
[11] K. Holmqvist,et al. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: Evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials , 2009, Brain and Language.
[12] Jukka Hyönä,et al. Do frequency characteristics of nonfixated words influence the processing of fixated words during reading? , 2004 .
[13] Denis Drieghe,et al. Using E-Z Reader to examine the consequences of fixation-location measurement error. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[14] Martin H Fischer,et al. Serial and parallel processes in eye movement control: Current controversies and future directions , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[15] S. Andrews,et al. Semantic preview benefit in English: Individual differences in the extraction and use of parafoveal semantic information. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[16] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Evidence for simultaneous syntactic processing of multiple words during reading , 2017, PloS one.
[17] Leslie Henderson,et al. A Word Superiority Effect without Orthographic Assistance , 1974 .
[18] Keith Rayner,et al. Parafoveal processing of word n + 2 during reading: do the preceding words matter? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[19] Gary E. Raney,et al. Eye movement control in reading and visual search: Effects of word frequency , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[20] Alexander Pollatsek,et al. Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[21] John Palmer,et al. Parallel spatial channels converge at a bottleneck in anterior word-selective cortex , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[22] J. O'Regan,et al. Fixation location effects on fixation durations during reading: an inverted optimal viewing position effect , 2001, Vision Research.
[23] A W Inhoff,et al. Is the processing of words during eye fixations in reading strictly serial? , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.
[24] H. Clahsen,et al. Grammatical constraints in syntactic processing: Sentence-matching experiments on German , 1995 .
[25] Jonathan Grainger,et al. Consciousness Is Not Key in the Serial-versus-Parallel Debate , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[26] Kenneth I Forster,et al. DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[27] Erik D. Reichle,et al. The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[28] K. Rayner. The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[29] Erik D. Reichle,et al. Rethinking parafoveal processing in reading: Serial-attention models can explain semantic preview benefit and N+2 preview effects , 2014 .
[30] Elizabeth R Schotter,et al. Synonyms Provide Semantic Preview Benefit in English. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.
[31] Alan Garnham,et al. Psycholinguistics: Central Topics , 1985 .
[32] Keith Rayner,et al. On the Processing of Meaning from Parafoveal Vision During Eye Fixations in Reading , 2003 .
[33] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. Parallel graded attention models of reading , 2011 .