Motion through syntactic frames

The introduction of Talmy's (1985, 2000) typology sparked significant interest in linguistic relativity in the arena of motion language. Through careful analysis of the conflation patterns evident in the language of motion events, Talmy noted that one class of languages, V-languages, tends to encode path along with the fact of motion in motion verbs, while a second class, S-languages, tends to encode manner. In the experimental literature, it was reasoned that speakers may be expected to extend novel verbs in accordance with the lexicalization patterns of their native languages. However, the results regarding this prediction are mixed. In this paper, I examine the interplay between the meaning encoded in the motion verb itself and the meaning encoded in the motion description construction, offering a Gricean explanation for co-occurrence patterns and, by extension, for the mixed results. I then explore the implications of this argument for research on possible language effects on thought in this domain.

[1]  L. Naigles,et al.  Weaving a lexicon , 2004 .

[2]  A. Goldberg.  The nature of generalization in language , 2009 .

[3]  Dan I. Slobin,et al.  Relating Narrative Events in Translation , 2005 .

[4]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  (1) Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms; and , 1987 .

[5]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Speaking of Motion: Verb Use in English and Spanish , 1998 .

[6]  S. Engel.  Thought and Language , 1964 .

[7]  L. Talmy.  Toward a Cognitive Semantics , 2003 .

[8]  Anna Papafragou,et al.  Does language guide event perception? Evidence from eye movements , 2008, Cognition.

[9]  Siobhan Chapman.  Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[10]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Naming motion events in Spanish and English , 2006 .

[11]  D. Slobin.  From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking” , 1996 .

[12]  Jill Hohenstein,et al.  Keeping verb acquisition in motion: A comparison of English and Spanish , 2004 .

[13]  Anna Papafragou,et al.  Shake, rattle, ‘n’ roll: the representation of motion in language and cognition , 2002, Cognition.

[14]  Chris Sinha,et al.  Distributed Spatial Semantics , 1995, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.

[15]  Paula Cifuentes Férez,et al.  SALIENCE AND ACCEPTABILITY IN SPANISH MANNER VERBS: A PRELIMINARY VIEW , 2007 .

[16]  L. Gleitman,et al.  When English proposes what Greek presupposes: The cross-linguistic encoding of motion events , 2006, Cognition.

[17]  D. Ravid,et al.  Perspectives on language and language development : essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman , 2010 .

[18]  T. Shopen,et al.  Language typology and syntactic description , 2013 .

[19]  Sven Strömqvist,et al.  Relating events in narrative : typological and contextual perspectives , 2004 .

[20]  S. Levinson,et al.  Rethinking Linguistic Relativity , 1991, Current Anthropology.

[21]  W. Bechtel,et al.  A companion to cognitive science , 1999 .

[22]  Dan I. Slobin,et al.  The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events , 2004 .

[23]  D. Slobin.  Thinking for Speaking , 1987 .

[24]  Silvia P. Gennari,et al.  Motion events in language and cognition , 2002, Cognition.

[25]  A. Goldberg.  The inherent semantics of argument structure: The case of the English ditransitive construction , 1992 .

[26]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Innateness and Emergentism , 2008 .

[27]  J. Hohenstein.  Language-Related Motion Event Similarities in English- and Spanish-Speaking Children , 2005 .

[28]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Motion-Verb Generalizations in English and Spanish: Influences of Language and Syntax , 1998 .