From ‘Quality-of-Service’ and ‘Quality-of-Design’ to ‘Quality-of-Experience’: A holistic view on future interactive telecommunication services

Telecommunications research can no longer be considered to be pure communications engineering. The convergence of fixed-line and mobile telephony with the Internet together with the rise of novel technologies for rapid service creation has made economic efficiency and user acceptance/usability to crucial factors for the success of the telecommunication business as such. In the emerging new paradigm, a holistic view onto the entire value chain from basic architectural concepts over the efficient design and implementation of new services and applications up to the end customer is becoming indispensable. Within this broad interdisciplinary field, the present paper focuses on the evolution of corresponding concepts for service quality. Whereas the traditional notion of 'QoS' (Quality-of-Service) is already well-established and has led to a plethora of research work mainly in the area of network architectures and protocols, the quality of service design ('QoD') has by far not received comparable attention in the research community. Nevertheless, we argue that both concepts are equally important for achieving a sufficient quality of user experience ('QoE') which eventually leads to both economic viability and user satisfaction. To illustrate our claim, we discuss recent developments in the area of QoS-enabled next generation network architectures as well as novel user-centric service design paradigms, examples for the resulting QoE evaluations and a novel HCI lab approach which allows flexible user tests of mobile applications "in the wild".

[1]  Peter Fröhlich,et al.  Beyond Location Based - The Spatially Aware Mobile Phone , 2006, W2GIS.

[2]  P. Reichl Charging for Quality-of-Experience : A New Paradigm for Pricing IP-based Service , 2006 .

[3]  Rainer Schmidt Adequateness - a Holistic Inquiry into Business Process Design , 2007 .

[4]  Joachim Fabini,et al.  Practical Experiences with an IMS-aware Location Service Enabler on Top of an Experimental Open Source IMS Core Implementation , 2006, J. Mobile Multimedia.

[5]  Chase Cotton,et al.  Packet-level traffic measurements from the Sprint IP backbone , 2003, IEEE Netw..

[6]  Peter Fröhlich,et al.  The HTI lab @ ftw: user research for telecom systems , 2006, CHI EA '06.

[7]  Peter Reichl From Charging for QoS to Charging for QoE: Internet Economics in the Era of Next Generation Multimedia Networks , 2007, AIMS.

[8]  Gerardo Rubino,et al.  Quantifying the Quality of Audio and Video Transmissions over the Internet: The PSQA Approach , 2006 .

[9]  David Hausheer,et al.  The Cumulus Pricing model as an adaptive framework for feasible, efficient, and user-friendly tariffing of Internet services , 2003, Comput. Networks.

[10]  Chen-Nee Chuah,et al.  Service availability: a new approach to characterize IP backbone topologies , 2004, Twelfth IEEE International Workshop on Quality of Service, 2004. IWQOS 2004..

[11]  Thomas Magedanz,et al.  Development of an Open Source IMS Core for Emerging IMS Testbeds, the Academia and Beyond , 2007, J. Mobile Multimedia.

[12]  Lynne Baillie,et al.  Exploring multimodality in the laboratory and the field , 2005, ICMI '05.

[13]  Alexander Raake,et al.  The well-tempered conversation: interactivity, delay and perceptual VoIP quality , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2005. ICC 2005. 2005.

[14]  Peter Fröhlich,et al.  The LiLiPUT prototype: a wearable lab environment for user tests of mobile telecommunication applications , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[15]  Jeffrey K. MacKie-Mason,et al.  Pricing the Internet , 1995 .

[16]  Peter Reichl,et al.  Second-Chance Auctions for Multimedia Session Pricing , 2003, MIPS.