The epidemiology of walking for physical activity in the United States.

PURPOSE The purpose of this paper was to describe the epidemiology of walking for physical activity among respondents to the U.S. Physical Activity Study. Correlates of walking among people who never walk for physical activity, those who walk regularly, and people who walk occasionally were compared. METHODS Data on walking, personal and environmental correlates, and sociodemographics were collected via telephone using a modified random-digit-dialing technique on a national sample. Three categories were analyzed: Regular walkers were those who met public health recommendations by walking (5x wk-1 and 30 min at a time), occasional walkers were those who walked for physical activity but did not meet this recommendation, and never walkers were those who never walked for physical activity. Multiple logistic regression resulting in odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS Thirty-four percent of this population were regular walkers, 45.6% occasional walkers, and 20.7% never walkers. Walkers reported using neighborhood streets, shopping malls, and parks for walking. Regular walkers had more self-confidence and more social support than occasional or never walkers. Occasional and never walkers reported time as a barrier more than regular walkers (OR 1.91 and 2.36). Never walkers were more likely (OR 3.25) to report feeling unhealthy and more likely (OR 4.43) to report lacking energy to exercise. CONCLUSION Our results identify important information that can be used to help guide future interventions that promote walking as a form of physical activity. An ecological approach that combines individual (e.g., self-confidence), interpersonal (e.g., social support), and community aspects (e.g., improve streets for walking) may be the most beneficial.

[1]  S. Homan,et al.  Reliability of information on physical activity and other chronic disease risk factors among US women aged 40 years or older. , 1999, American journal of epidemiology.

[2]  G W Heath,et al.  The epidemiology of walking for exercise: implications for promoting activity among sedentary groups. , 1995, American journal of public health.

[3]  G A Colditz,et al.  A prospective study of walking as compared with vigorous exercise in the prevention of coronary heart disease in women. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  A. King,et al.  Lifestyle Activity , 1996, Sports medicine.

[5]  K. Kukkonen-Harjula,et al.  Effects of walking training on weight maintenance after a very-low-energy diet in premenopausal obese women: a randomized controlled trial. , 2000, Archives of internal medicine.

[6]  R S Paffenbarger,et al.  Associations of light, moderate, and vigorous intensity physical activity with longevity. The Harvard Alumni Health Study. , 2000, American journal of epidemiology.

[7]  B H Marcus,et al.  Determinants of physical activity and interventions in adults. , 1992, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[8]  K. Patrick,et al.  Physical Activity and Public Health: A Recommendation From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine , 1995 .

[9]  P L Remington,et al.  Design, characteristics, and usefulness of state-based behavioral risk factor surveillance: 1981-87. , 1988, Public health reports.

[10]  R. E. Keesey,et al.  A meta-analysis of the factors affecting exercise-induced changes in body mass, fat mass and fat-free mass in males and females. , 1991, International journal of obesity.

[11]  J. Kampert,et al.  Comparison of lifestyle and structured interventions to increase physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness: a randomized trial. , 1999, JAMA.

[12]  R. Brownson,et al.  Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the United States. , 2001, American journal of public health.

[13]  M. Pratt,et al.  Public health surveillance of physical activity. , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[14]  J F Sallis,et al.  Physical activity social support and middle- and older-aged minority women: results from a US survey. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[15]  J. Manson,et al.  Primary prevention of coronary heart disease in women through diet and lifestyle. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  G C Hogelin,et al.  The behavioral risk factor surveys: II. Design, methods, and estimates from combined state data. , 1985, American journal of preventive medicine.

[17]  M Hillsdon,et al.  Randomised controlled trials of physical activity promotion in free living populations: a review. , 1995, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[18]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  Association among physical activity level, cardiorespiratory fitness, and risk of musculoskeletal injury. , 2001, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  James F. Sallis,et al.  Determinants and interventions for physical activity and exercise. , 1994 .

[20]  James F. Sallis,et al.  Physical activity & behavioral medicine , 1999 .

[21]  Usdhhs Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General , 1996 .

[22]  J F Sallis,et al.  Identifying correlates of walking for exercise: an epidemiologic prerequisite for physical activity promotion. , 1989, Preventive medicine.

[23]  K. Yano,et al.  Effects of walking on mortality among nonsmoking retired men. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  R. Goodman,et al.  Developing and Evaluating a Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Project. , 1997 .

[25]  B E Ainsworth,et al.  Comparison of three methods for measuring the time spent in physical activity. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[26]  J. Sallis,et al.  Physical Activity and Behavioral Medicine , 1998 .