MR-guided breast radiotherapy: feasibility and magnetic-field impact on skin dose

The UMC Utrecht MRI/linac (MRL) design provides image guidance with high soft-tissue contrast, directly during radiotherapy (RT). Breast cancer patients are a potential group to benefit from better guidance in the MRL. However, due to the electron return effect, the skin dose can be increased in presence of a magnetic field. Since large skin areas are generally involved in breast RT, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effects on the skin dose, for whole-breast irradiation (WBI) and accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI). In ten patients with early-stage breast cancer, targets and organs at risk (OARs) were delineated on postoperative CT scans co-registered with MRI. The OARs included the skin, comprising the first 5 mm of ipsilateral-breast tissue, plus extensions. Three intensity-modulated RT techniques were considered (2× WBI, 1× APBI). Individual beam geometries were used for all patients. Specially developed MRL treatment-planning software was used. Acceptable plans were generated for 0 T, 0.35 T and 1.5 T, using a class solution. The skin dose was augmented in WBI in the presence of a magnetic field, which is a potential drawback, whereas in APBI the induced effects were negligible. This opens possibilities for developing MR-guided partial-breast treatments in the MRL.

[1]  B. Fallone,et al.  First MR images obtained during megavoltage photon irradiation from a prototype integrated linac-MR system. , 2009, Medical physics.

[2]  G J Kutcher,et al.  Intensity-modulated tangential beam irradiation of the intact breast. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Intra- and interfractional reproducibility of tangential breast fields: a prospective on-line portal imaging study. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  H. Putter,et al.  Long-term cosmetic changes after breast-conserving treatment of patients with stage I-II breast cancer and included in the EORTC 'boost versus no boost' trial. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[5]  H. Bartelink,et al.  Pre-treatment imaging and pathology characteristics of invasive breast cancers of limited extent: potential relevance for MRI-guided localized therapy. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[6]  P E Metcalfe,et al.  Monte Carlo characterization of skin doses in 6 MV transverse field MRI-linac systems: effect of field size, surface orientation, magnetic field strength, and exit bolus. , 2010, Medical physics.

[7]  P. Evans,et al.  Relationship between irradiated breast volume and late normal tissue complications: a systematic review. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  W. Bloomer,et al.  Accelerated partial breast irradiation using once-daily fractionation: analysis of 312 cases with four years median follow-up , 2012, Radiation oncology.

[9]  J G M Kok,et al.  Integrating a 1.5 T MRI scanner with a 6 MV accelerator: proof of concept , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Benoît Ozell,et al.  GPUMCD: A new GPU-oriented Monte Carlo dose calculation platform. , 2011, Medical physics.

[11]  K. Griffith,et al.  Accelerated partial breast irradiation: what is dosimetric effect of advanced technology approaches? , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  M. Halliwell,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging appearances in the postoperative breast: the clinical target volume-tumor and its relationship to the chest wall. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  J E Mortimer,et al.  Factors influencing cosmetic results after conservation therapy for breast cancer. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Tae Hyun Kim,et al.  Dosimetric comparison of four different external beam partial breast irradiation techniques: three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, helical tomotherapy, and proton beam therapy. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[15]  W. Beckham,et al.  Inverse-planned, dynamic, multi-beam, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT): a promising technique when target volume is the left breast and internal mammary lymph nodes. , 2006, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[16]  Eugene Wong,et al.  A treatment planning study comparing whole breast radiation therapy against conformal, IMRT and tomotherapy for accelerated partial breast irradiation. , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  Michael B Sharpe,et al.  Impact of breathing motion on whole breast radiotherapy: a dosimetric analysis using active breathing control. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  E. Kouwenhoven,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging- versus computed tomography-based target volume delineation of the glandular breast tissue (clinical target volume breast) in breast-conserving therapy: an exploratory study. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  J O Archambeau,et al.  Pathophysiology of irradiated skin and breast. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  R. Mohan,et al.  Quantifying the effect of intrafraction motion during breast IMRT planning and dose delivery. , 2003, Medical physics.

[21]  C. Takita,et al.  Accelerated partial breast irradiation is safe and effective using intensity-modulated radiation therapy in selected early-stage breast cancer. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  Jan J W Lagendijk,et al.  MRI/linac integration. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  B W Raaymakers,et al.  Integrating a MRI scanner with a 6 MV radiotherapy accelerator: impact of the surface orientation on the entrance and exit dose due to the transverse magnetic field , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Real-time fast inverse dose optimization for image guided adaptive radiation therapy–Enhancements to fast inverse dose optimization (FIDO) , 2009 .

[25]  L. Livi,et al.  Accelerated partial breast irradiation with IMRT: new technical approach and interim analysis of acute toxicity in a phase III randomized clinical trial. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  B W Raaymakers,et al.  Fast online Monte Carlo-based IMRT planning for the MRI linear accelerator , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  P. Evans,et al.  Tumor bed delineation for partial breast and breast boost radiotherapy planned in the prone position: what does MRI add to X-ray CT localization of titanium clips placed in the excision cavity wall? , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  P. Peter,et al.  Open Low-Field Magnetic Resonance (MR) Versus CT Scanner (CT) Imaging in Breast Radiotherapy Treatment Planning , 2005 .

[29]  T. Lindmo,et al.  Superficial doses in breast cancer radiotherapy using conventional and IMRT techniques: a film-based phantom study. , 2011, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[30]  L Collette,et al.  The influence of patient, tumor and treatment factors on the cosmetic results after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC 'boost vs. no boost' trial. EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[31]  Christian M Langton,et al.  Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI): A review of available techniques , 2010, Radiation oncology.

[32]  P E Metcalfe,et al.  High resolution entry and exit Monte Carlo dose calculations from a linear accelerator 6 MV beam under the influence of transverse magnetic fields. , 2009, Medical physics.

[33]  J. R. Palta,et al.  WE-E-ValA-06: A Real-Time MRI Guided External Beam Radiotherapy Delivery System , 2006 .

[34]  A. Munshi,et al.  Factors influencing cosmetic outcome in breast conservation. , 2009, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[35]  B W Raaymakers,et al.  Integrating a MRI scanner with a 6 MV radiotherapy accelerator: dose increase at tissue–air interfaces in a lateral magnetic field due to returning electrons , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[36]  J. Hopewell,et al.  The skin: its structure and response to ionizing radiation. , 1990, International journal of radiation biology.

[37]  R. Buxton.  The physics of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) , 2013, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[38]  J. Wong,et al.  Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[39]  J. Kurtz.  Impact of radiotherapy on breast cosmesis , 1995 .

[40]  L. Cozzi,et al.  A planning comparison of dose patterns in organs at risk and predicted risk for radiation induced malignancy in the contralateral breast following radiation therapy of primary breast using conventional, IMRT and Volumetric modulated arc treatment techniques , 2009, Acta oncologica.