Lightweight GPS-Tags, One Giant Leap for Wildlife Tracking? An Assessment Approach

Recent technological improvements have made possible the development of lightweight GPS-tagging devices suitable to track medium-to-small sized animals. However, current inferences concerning GPS performance are based on heavier designs, suitable only for large mammals. Lightweight GPS-units are deployed close to the ground, on species selecting micro-topographical features and with different behavioural patterns in comparison to larger mammal species. We assessed the effects of vegetation, topography, motion, and behaviour on the fix success rate for lightweight GPS-collar across a range of natural environments, and at the scale of perception of feral cats (Felis catus). Units deployed at 20 cm above the ground in sites of varied vegetation and topography showed that trees (native forest) and shrub cover had the largest influence on fix success rate (89% on average); whereas tree cover, sky availability, number of satellites and horizontal dilution of position (HDOP) were the main variables affecting location error (±39.5 m and ±27.6 m before and after filtering outlier fixes). Tests on HDOP or number of satellites-based screening methods to remove inaccurate locations achieved only a small reduction of error and discarded many accurate locations. Mobility tests were used to simulate cats' motion, revealing a slightly lower performance as compared to the fixed sites. GPS-collars deployed on 43 cats showed no difference in fix success rate by sex or season. Overall, fix success rate and location error values were within the range of previous tests carried out with collars designed for larger species. Lightweight GPS-tags are a suitable method to track medium to small size species, hence increasing the range of opportunities for spatial ecology research. However, the effects of vegetation, topography and behaviour on location error and fix success rate need to be evaluated prior to deployment, for the particular study species and their habitats.

[1]  D. Seip,et al.  Grizzly Bear Behavior and Global Positioning System Collar Fix Rates , 2008 .

[2]  Eon,et al.  Effects of a stationary GPS fix-rate BIAS on habitat-selection analyses , 2003 .

[3]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Evaluating Global Positioning System Telemetry Techniques for Estimating Cougar Predation Parameters , 2009 .

[4]  Joseph Tucker Springer,et al.  Some sources of bias and sampling error in radio triangulation , 1979 .

[5]  Donna Delparte,et al.  Effects of radio‐collar position and orientation on GPS radio‐collar performance, and the implications of PDOP in data screening , 2005 .

[6]  P. Forer,et al.  Performance Characteristics of Small Global-Positioning-System Tracking Collars , 2010 .

[7]  Arthur R. Rodgers,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF A GPS ANIMAL LOCATION SYSTEM UNDER BOREAL FOREST CANOPY , 1995 .

[8]  Joseph Hilbe,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2009 .

[9]  Stanley M Tomkiewicz,et al.  Global positioning system and associated technologies in animal behaviour and ecological research , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Yosef Cohen,et al.  Effects of moose movement and habitat use on GPS collar performance , 1996 .

[11]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[12]  A. El-Rabbany.  Introduction to GPS: The Global Positioning System , 2002 .

[13]  Y. Arnaud,et al.  Subpixel monitoring of the seasonal snow cover with MODIS at 250 m spatial resolution in the Southern Alps of New Zealand: Methodology and accuracy assessment , 2009 .

[14]  Gordon B. Stenhouse,et al.  Removing GPS collar bias in habitat selection studies , 2004 .

[15]  Helen M. Blackie.  Comparative Performance of Three Brands of Lightweight Global Positioning System Collars , 2010 .

[16]  Mikio Sugita,et al.  Effects of habitat feature, antenna position, movement, and fix interval on GPS radio collar performance in Mount Fuji, central Japan , 2007, Ecological Research.

[17]  M. Hebblewhite,et al.  Are All Global Positioning System Collars Created Equal? Correcting Habitat-Induced Bias Using Three Brands in the Central Canadian Rockies , 2007 .

[18]  J. Mcneff.  The global positioning system , 2002 .

[19]  P. Krausman,et al.  Influence of topography and GPS fix interval on GPS collar performance , 2005 .

[20]  Miina Rautiainen,et al.  Local Models for Forest Canopy Cover with Beta Regression , 2007 .

[21]  I. Hulbert,et al.  The accuracy of GPS for wildlife telemetry and habitat mapping , 2001 .

[22]  Francesca Cagnacci,et al.  Resolving issues of imprecise and habitat-biased locations in ecological analyses using GPS telemetry data , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Jerrold L. Belant,et al.  Effects of Antenna Orientation and Vegetation on Global Positioning System Telemetry Collar Performance , 2009 .

[24]  F. Cagnacci,et al.  Animal ecology meets GPS-based radiotelemetry: a perfect storm of opportunities and challenges , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  Ivar Herfindal,et al.  Screening Global Positioning System Location Data for Errors Using Animal Movement Characteristics , 2010 .

[26]  Steve Cherry,et al.  Performance of Spread Spectrum Global Positioning System Collars on Grizzly and Black Bears , 2009 .

[27]  M. Rautiainen,et al.  Estimation of forest canopy cover: A comparison of field measurement techniques , 2006 .

[28]  K. Moseby,et al.  Movement patterns of feral predators in an arid environment – implications for control through poison baiting , 2009 .

[29]  P. Nagel,et al.  Suitability of using the global positioning system (GPS) for studying Feral Pigeons Columba livia in the urban habitat , 2005 .

[30]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2006 .

[31]  R. Mathieu,et al.  Design of a GPS backpack to track European hedgehogs Erinaceus europaeus , 2011, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[32]  J. Dozier,et al.  A faster solution to the horizon problem , 1981 .

[33]  Tabitha A. Graves,et al.  Understanding the Causes of Missed Global Positioning System Telemetry Fixes , 2006 .

[34]  Jason B. Hardin,et al.  Evaluation of a Global Positioning System Backpack Transmitter for Wild Turkey Research , 2011 .

[35]  O. Ovaskainen,et al.  State-space models of individual animal movement. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[36]  P. Fresquez,et al.  Relationship between home range characteristics and the probability of obtaining successful global positioning system (GPS) collar positions for elk in New Mexico , 2001 .

[37]  P. Wegge,et al.  Gps Satellite Telemetry Provides New Insight into Capercaillie Tetrao urogallus Brood Movements , 2007 .

[38]  Lee A. Vierling,et al.  Effects of habitat on GPS collar performance: using data screening to reduce location error , 2007 .

[39]  A. Paletto,et al.  Forest canopy cover and canopy closure: comparison of assessment techniques , 2009, European Journal of Forest Research.

[40]  R. Mathieu,et al.  First results of feral cats (Felis catus) monitored with GPS collars in New Zealand , 2010 .

[41]  D. Sprague,et al.  Field testing a global positioning system (GPS) collar on a Japanese monkey: reliability of automatic GPS positioning in a Japanese forest , 2004, Primates.

[42]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model Selection and Multimodel Inference , 2003 .

[43]  J. Janecka,et al.  First ocelot (Leopardus pardalis) monitored with GPS telemetry , 2006, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[44]  Christopher O. Kochanny,et al.  GPS radiotelemetry error and bias in mountainous terrain , 2002 .

[45]  Stan Lipovetsky,et al.  Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel,Longitudinal, and Structural Equation Models , 2005, Technometrics.

[46]  Sophia Rabe-Hesketh,et al.  Generalized latent variable models: multilevel, longitudinal, and structural equation models , 2004 .

[47]  Y. Heezik,et al.  Do domestic cats impose an unsustainable harvest on urban bird populations , 2010 .

[48]  BRUNO CARGNELUTTI,et al.  Testing Global Positioning System Performance for Wildlife Monitoring Using Mobile Collars and Known Reference Points , 2007 .

[49]  Lars Edenius,et al.  Field test of a GPS location system for moose Alces alces under Scandinavian boreal conditions , 1997, Wildlife Biology.